MRgRT real-time target localization using foundation models for contour point tracking and promptable mask refinement.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Tom Julius Blöcker, Elia Lombardo, Sebastian Marschner, Claus Belka, Stefanie Corradini, Miguel A Palacios, Marco Riboldi, Christopher Kurz, Guillaume Landry
{"title":"MRgRT real-time target localization using foundation models for contour point tracking and promptable mask refinement.","authors":"Tom Julius Blöcker, Elia Lombardo, Sebastian Marschner, Claus Belka, Stefanie Corradini, Miguel A Palacios, Marco Riboldi, Christopher Kurz, Guillaume Landry","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad9dad","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate two real-time target tracking approaches for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) based on foundation artificial intelligence (AI) models.&#xD;&#xD;Approach: The first approach used a point-tracking model that propagates points from a reference contour. The second approach used a video-object-segmentation model, based on Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2). Both approaches were evaluated and compared against each other, inter-observer variability, and a transformer-based image registration model, TransMorph, with and without patient-specific (PS) fine-tuning. The evaluation was carried out on 2D cine MRI datasets from two institutions, containing scans from 33 patients with 8060 labeled frames, with annotations from 2 to 5 observers per frame, totaling 29179 ground truth segmentations. The segmentations produced were assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 50% and 95% Hausdorff distances (HD50 / HD95), and the Euclidean center distance (ECD).&#xD;&#xD;Main results: The results showed that the contour tracking (median DSC 0.92 ± 0.04 and ECD 1.9 ± 1.0 mm) and SAM2-based (median DSC 0.93 ± 0.03 and ECD 1.6 ± 1.1 mm) approaches produced target segmentations comparable or superior to TransMorph without PS fine-tuning (median DSC 0.91 ± 0.07 and ECD 2.6 ± 1.4 mm) and slightly inferior to TransMorph with PS fine-tuning (median DSC 0.94 ± 0.03 and ECD 1.4 ± 0.8 mm). Between the two novel approaches, the one based on SAM2 performed marginally better at a higher computational cost (inference times 92 ms for contour tracking and 109 ms for SAM2). Both approaches and TransMorph with PS fine-tuning exceeded inter-observer variability (median DSC 0.90 ± 0.06 and ECD 1.7 ± 0.7 mm).&#xD;&#xD;Significance: This study demonstrates the potential of foundation models to achieve high-quality real-time target tracking in MRgRT, offering performance that matches state-of-the-art methods without requiring PS fine-tuning.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad9dad","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate two real-time target tracking approaches for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) based on foundation artificial intelligence (AI) models. Approach: The first approach used a point-tracking model that propagates points from a reference contour. The second approach used a video-object-segmentation model, based on Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2). Both approaches were evaluated and compared against each other, inter-observer variability, and a transformer-based image registration model, TransMorph, with and without patient-specific (PS) fine-tuning. The evaluation was carried out on 2D cine MRI datasets from two institutions, containing scans from 33 patients with 8060 labeled frames, with annotations from 2 to 5 observers per frame, totaling 29179 ground truth segmentations. The segmentations produced were assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 50% and 95% Hausdorff distances (HD50 / HD95), and the Euclidean center distance (ECD). Main results: The results showed that the contour tracking (median DSC 0.92 ± 0.04 and ECD 1.9 ± 1.0 mm) and SAM2-based (median DSC 0.93 ± 0.03 and ECD 1.6 ± 1.1 mm) approaches produced target segmentations comparable or superior to TransMorph without PS fine-tuning (median DSC 0.91 ± 0.07 and ECD 2.6 ± 1.4 mm) and slightly inferior to TransMorph with PS fine-tuning (median DSC 0.94 ± 0.03 and ECD 1.4 ± 0.8 mm). Between the two novel approaches, the one based on SAM2 performed marginally better at a higher computational cost (inference times 92 ms for contour tracking and 109 ms for SAM2). Both approaches and TransMorph with PS fine-tuning exceeded inter-observer variability (median DSC 0.90 ± 0.06 and ECD 1.7 ± 0.7 mm). Significance: This study demonstrates the potential of foundation models to achieve high-quality real-time target tracking in MRgRT, offering performance that matches state-of-the-art methods without requiring PS fine-tuning.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信