The SurVey of barriers for Vaginal access surgerY (SaVVY) Study: The SaVVY Study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gabriela E Halder, Cecile A Ferrando, Rebecca Rogers, Caren Elhenawy, Cara L Grimes, Sunil Balgobin, Rosanne M Kho, Andrew I Sokol
{"title":"The SurVey of barriers for Vaginal access surgerY (SaVVY) Study: The SaVVY Study.","authors":"Gabriela E Halder, Cecile A Ferrando, Rebecca Rogers, Caren Elhenawy, Cara L Grimes, Sunil Balgobin, Rosanne M Kho, Andrew I Sokol","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to describe vaginal hysterectomy practice patterns as well as facilitators and inhibitors to performing vaginal hysterectomy among gynecologic surgeons. Secondary objectives were to describe facilitators and inhibitors to the teaching and training of vaginal hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quantitative analysis of an online survey and qualitative analyses of the one-on-one interviews on gynecologic surgeons was conducted. This study was approved by the IRB.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey and one-on -one virtual interviews.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Members of the AAGL and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 505 gynecologic surgeons completed the survey. Most surgeons were white (66.9%) and had a clinic in North America (67.5%). About 48% of respondents reported \"no barrier\" to performing vaginal hysterectomies including pathology, visualization and exposure, and performance of concomitant procedures. Higher surgical volume was the only factor most commonly rated by surgeons as enabling teaching of vaginal hysterectomy \"quite a bit\" (31.3%). Most surgeons agreed that vaginal hysterectomies are important to women's health (82.8%) and that all gynecologic surgeons should be able to perform vaginal hysterectomies (66.3%). In terms of medical education and training, most surgeons thought that residents should be required to achieve competency for vaginal hysterectomy prior to graduation (71.7%) and disagreed (56.0%) that we should eliminate residency graduation requirements for vaginal hysterectomy numbers. From the one-on-one interviews, major themes identified included: Advocacy, Centralizing Efforts, Compensation and Incentives, Cycle of Low Experience, Decreasing Regional Trends, Lack of Industry Support, Transvaginal versus Laparoscopy Culture, Varied Training Targets and Resources, Innovations in Training, and Self-Motivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaginal hysterectomy remains important to our field. Identified barriers and major themes from this study can direct future efforts to increase its adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.12.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: The primary objective of this study was to describe vaginal hysterectomy practice patterns as well as facilitators and inhibitors to performing vaginal hysterectomy among gynecologic surgeons. Secondary objectives were to describe facilitators and inhibitors to the teaching and training of vaginal hysterectomy.

Design: Quantitative analysis of an online survey and qualitative analyses of the one-on-one interviews on gynecologic surgeons was conducted. This study was approved by the IRB.

Setting: Online survey and one-on -one virtual interviews.

Participants: Members of the AAGL and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 505 gynecologic surgeons completed the survey. Most surgeons were white (66.9%) and had a clinic in North America (67.5%). About 48% of respondents reported "no barrier" to performing vaginal hysterectomies including pathology, visualization and exposure, and performance of concomitant procedures. Higher surgical volume was the only factor most commonly rated by surgeons as enabling teaching of vaginal hysterectomy "quite a bit" (31.3%). Most surgeons agreed that vaginal hysterectomies are important to women's health (82.8%) and that all gynecologic surgeons should be able to perform vaginal hysterectomies (66.3%). In terms of medical education and training, most surgeons thought that residents should be required to achieve competency for vaginal hysterectomy prior to graduation (71.7%) and disagreed (56.0%) that we should eliminate residency graduation requirements for vaginal hysterectomy numbers. From the one-on-one interviews, major themes identified included: Advocacy, Centralizing Efforts, Compensation and Incentives, Cycle of Low Experience, Decreasing Regional Trends, Lack of Industry Support, Transvaginal versus Laparoscopy Culture, Varied Training Targets and Resources, Innovations in Training, and Self-Motivation.

Conclusions: Vaginal hysterectomy remains important to our field. Identified barriers and major themes from this study can direct future efforts to increase its adoption.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信