Effect of Voiding Policy on Post Anesthesia Care Unit Length of Stay for Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Akash Shah, Andrea Molina, Camille Moeckel, Molly Stegman, Kristin Riley, Arpit Dave, Christina Stetter, Allen Kunselman, Linda Li
{"title":"Effect of Voiding Policy on Post Anesthesia Care Unit Length of Stay for Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.","authors":"Akash Shah, Andrea Molina, Camille Moeckel, Molly Stegman, Kristin Riley, Arpit Dave, Christina Stetter, Allen Kunselman, Linda Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate a liberal postoperative voiding policy after minimally invasive hysterectomies to assess the impact of length of stay in the postoperative care unit (PACU).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a retrospective interrupted time series study. Patients were identified from three months before and after the policy change, and a chart review was conducted of medical records. The study was powered to detect a difference of 60 minutes between the pre- and post-policy groups. Secondary outcomes included post operative urinary retention (POUR), postoperative readmission and urinary tract infections (UTI). Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Fisher's exact tests were utilized to compare outcomes between the pre- and post-policy groups.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All surgeries were completed within the division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery at a single academic institution.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Female patients aged 18 and older were included if they had undergone a minimally-invasive hysterectomy for benign indications between August 17, 2022 and February 17, 2023. Exclusion criteria included surgery for gynecologic cancer, concurrent incontinence or pelvic floor surgeries, or if patients had a history of urinary retention or bladder surgery.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A new liberal voiding protocol that did not require patients to void prior to discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>65 patients were identified for the pre-policy group, and 54 in the post-policy group. There was insufficient evidence to detect a difference in PACU length of stay (median 302 minutes pre vs. 250 minutes post) or incidence of POUR or UTIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concluded that a liberal voiding protocol is a feasible policy change. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the PACU length of stay, there was a trend towards decreased length of stay as the median was lower for this group. The results point towards a liberal voiding policy being safe, without changes seen in rates of POUR or UTIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.12.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate a liberal postoperative voiding policy after minimally invasive hysterectomies to assess the impact of length of stay in the postoperative care unit (PACU).

Design: This is a retrospective interrupted time series study. Patients were identified from three months before and after the policy change, and a chart review was conducted of medical records. The study was powered to detect a difference of 60 minutes between the pre- and post-policy groups. Secondary outcomes included post operative urinary retention (POUR), postoperative readmission and urinary tract infections (UTI). Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Fisher's exact tests were utilized to compare outcomes between the pre- and post-policy groups.

Setting: All surgeries were completed within the division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery at a single academic institution.

Participants: Female patients aged 18 and older were included if they had undergone a minimally-invasive hysterectomy for benign indications between August 17, 2022 and February 17, 2023. Exclusion criteria included surgery for gynecologic cancer, concurrent incontinence or pelvic floor surgeries, or if patients had a history of urinary retention or bladder surgery.

Intervention: A new liberal voiding protocol that did not require patients to void prior to discharge.

Results: 65 patients were identified for the pre-policy group, and 54 in the post-policy group. There was insufficient evidence to detect a difference in PACU length of stay (median 302 minutes pre vs. 250 minutes post) or incidence of POUR or UTIs.

Conclusion: The study concluded that a liberal voiding protocol is a feasible policy change. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the PACU length of stay, there was a trend towards decreased length of stay as the median was lower for this group. The results point towards a liberal voiding policy being safe, without changes seen in rates of POUR or UTIs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信