Capnodynamic determination of end-expiratory lung volume in a porcine model of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Aron Törnwall, Mats Wallin, Magnus Hallbäck, Per-Arne Lönnqvist, Jacob Karlsson
{"title":"Capnodynamic determination of end-expiratory lung volume in a porcine model of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction.","authors":"Aron Törnwall, Mats Wallin, Magnus Hallbäck, Per-Arne Lönnqvist, Jacob Karlsson","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01251-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The capnodynamic method, End Expiratory Lung Volume CO<sub>2</sub> (EELV-CO<sub>2</sub>), utilizes exhaled carbon dioxide analysis to estimate End-Expiratory Lung Volume (EELV) and has been validated in both normal lungs and lung injury models. Its performance under systemic hypoxia and variations in CO<sub>2</sub> elimination is not examined. This study aims to validate EELV-CO<sub>2</sub> against inert gas wash in/wash out (EELV- SF6, sulfur hexafluoride) in a porcine model of stable hemodynamic conditions followed by hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and inhaled nitric oxide (iNO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten mechanically ventilated piglets were exposed to a hypoxic gas mixture and selective pulmonary vasoconstriction. Inhalation of nitric oxide was used to reverse the pulmonary vasoconstriction. Paired recordings of EELV-CO<sub>2</sub> and EELV-SF6, were conducted to assess their agreement of absolute values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EELV-CO<sub>2</sub> showed a bias of + 5 ml kg<sup>- 1</sup> compared to EELV-SF6, upper limit of agreement of 11 ml kg<sup>- 1</sup> (95%CI: 9-13 ml kg<sup>- 1</sup>), lower limit of agreement - 1 ml kg<sup>- 1</sup> (95%CI: -3- 0 ml kg<sup>- 1</sup>), mean percentage error 34%. Agreement between EELV-CO<sub>2</sub> and EELV-SF6 was largely constant but was affected by progressing hypoxia and reached maximum limit of agreement after iNO exposure. Re-introduction of normoxemia then stabilized bias and limits of agreement to baseline levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EELV-CO<sub>2</sub> generates absolute values in parallel with EELV -SF6. Stressing EELV-CO<sub>2</sub> with hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and iNO, transiently impairs the agreement which stabilizes once normoxemia is reestablished.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01251-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The capnodynamic method, End Expiratory Lung Volume CO2 (EELV-CO2), utilizes exhaled carbon dioxide analysis to estimate End-Expiratory Lung Volume (EELV) and has been validated in both normal lungs and lung injury models. Its performance under systemic hypoxia and variations in CO2 elimination is not examined. This study aims to validate EELV-CO2 against inert gas wash in/wash out (EELV- SF6, sulfur hexafluoride) in a porcine model of stable hemodynamic conditions followed by hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and inhaled nitric oxide (iNO).

Methods: Ten mechanically ventilated piglets were exposed to a hypoxic gas mixture and selective pulmonary vasoconstriction. Inhalation of nitric oxide was used to reverse the pulmonary vasoconstriction. Paired recordings of EELV-CO2 and EELV-SF6, were conducted to assess their agreement of absolute values.

Results: EELV-CO2 showed a bias of + 5 ml kg- 1 compared to EELV-SF6, upper limit of agreement of 11 ml kg- 1 (95%CI: 9-13 ml kg- 1), lower limit of agreement - 1 ml kg- 1 (95%CI: -3- 0 ml kg- 1), mean percentage error 34%. Agreement between EELV-CO2 and EELV-SF6 was largely constant but was affected by progressing hypoxia and reached maximum limit of agreement after iNO exposure. Re-introduction of normoxemia then stabilized bias and limits of agreement to baseline levels.

Conclusion: EELV-CO2 generates absolute values in parallel with EELV -SF6. Stressing EELV-CO2 with hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and iNO, transiently impairs the agreement which stabilizes once normoxemia is reestablished.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信