The predictive power of the Roussouly classification on mechanical complications after surgery for adult spinal deformity: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08596-w
Marven Aoun, Mohammad Daher, Alan H Daniels, Gaby Kreichati, Khalil Kharrat, Amer Sebaaly
{"title":"The predictive power of the Roussouly classification on mechanical complications after surgery for adult spinal deformity: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Marven Aoun, Mohammad Daher, Alan H Daniels, Gaby Kreichati, Khalil Kharrat, Amer Sebaaly","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08596-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increasing prevalence of adult spinal deformity (ASD) in the aging population, the need for corrective surgery has surged, highlighting the importance of preventing mechanical complications (MC) such as junctional kyphosis/failure and rod breakage. The Roussouly classification, which categorizes natural variations in spinal posture, may hold predictive value in assessing the risk of these complications, as it guides the restoration of sagittal alignment based on a patient's preoperative spinal shape.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched through August 2024 to find articles comparing the incidence of mechanical complications between patients who were matched and mismatched to their ideal Roussouly shape after surgery for ASD. Extracted data consisted of the risk of mechanical complications, and the risk of reoperations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>10 retrospective studies were included in this meta-analysis, with 1454 patients divided into 2 groups, the first group matching Roussouly classification (716 patients, 49%) and the second unmatched (738 patients, 51%). A 5-times lower rate of mechanical complication (Odds-Ratio = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.12-0.41, p < 0.001) was found in the matched group at an average follow-up of 3.6 years. Furthermore, when examining specific mechanical complications, there were higher rates of both PJK (Odds-Ratio = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.07-2.38, p = 0.02) and rod breakages (Odds-Ratio = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.15-2.66, p = 0.01) in the unmatched group. However, no difference in the rate of reoperations was observed between the two groups (Odds-Ratio = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.18-1.28, p = 0.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Matching patients to their ideal Roussouly type in adult spinal deformity surgery significantly reduces mechanical complications making it a secure and efficient method. Future studies should compare the Roussouly classification to other alignment models to determine optimal alignment for ASD correction surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"741-747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08596-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the increasing prevalence of adult spinal deformity (ASD) in the aging population, the need for corrective surgery has surged, highlighting the importance of preventing mechanical complications (MC) such as junctional kyphosis/failure and rod breakage. The Roussouly classification, which categorizes natural variations in spinal posture, may hold predictive value in assessing the risk of these complications, as it guides the restoration of sagittal alignment based on a patient's preoperative spinal shape.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched through August 2024 to find articles comparing the incidence of mechanical complications between patients who were matched and mismatched to their ideal Roussouly shape after surgery for ASD. Extracted data consisted of the risk of mechanical complications, and the risk of reoperations.

Results: 10 retrospective studies were included in this meta-analysis, with 1454 patients divided into 2 groups, the first group matching Roussouly classification (716 patients, 49%) and the second unmatched (738 patients, 51%). A 5-times lower rate of mechanical complication (Odds-Ratio = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.12-0.41, p < 0.001) was found in the matched group at an average follow-up of 3.6 years. Furthermore, when examining specific mechanical complications, there were higher rates of both PJK (Odds-Ratio = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.07-2.38, p = 0.02) and rod breakages (Odds-Ratio = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.15-2.66, p = 0.01) in the unmatched group. However, no difference in the rate of reoperations was observed between the two groups (Odds-Ratio = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.18-1.28, p = 0.14).

Conclusion: Matching patients to their ideal Roussouly type in adult spinal deformity surgery significantly reduces mechanical complications making it a secure and efficient method. Future studies should compare the Roussouly classification to other alignment models to determine optimal alignment for ASD correction surgery.

Level of evidence: III.

Roussouly分类对成人脊柱畸形术后机械并发症的预测能力:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:随着成人脊柱畸形(ASD)在老龄化人群中的患病率增加,对矫正手术的需求激增,这突出了预防机械并发症(MC)的重要性,如关节后凸/失败和棒断裂。Roussouly分类,对脊柱姿势的自然变化进行分类,可能在评估这些并发症的风险方面具有预测价值,因为它指导了基于患者术前脊柱形状的矢状位对齐恢复。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane和谷歌Scholar(第1-20页),检索到2024年8月,比较与理想Roussouly形状匹配和不匹配的ASD术后患者机械并发症发生率的文章。提取的数据包括机械并发症的风险和再手术的风险。结果:本荟萃分析纳入10项回顾性研究,1454例患者分为2组,第一组符合Roussouly分类(716例,49%),第二组不匹配(738例,51%)。机械并发症发生率降低5倍(优势比= 0.22;结论:在成人脊柱畸形手术中,将患者与理想Roussouly型匹配可显著减少机械并发症,是一种安全有效的方法。未来的研究应将Roussouly分类与其他对齐模型进行比较,以确定ASD矫正手术的最佳对齐方式。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信