Dual Activation-Induced Marker Combinations Efficiently Identify and Discern Antigen-Specific and Bystander-Activated Human CD4+ T Cells.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Maria Grazia Ceraolo, Maristella Leccese, Antonino Cassotta, Sara Triolo, Mauro Bombaci, Elena Coluccio, Daniele Prati, Riccardo Ungaro, Sergio Abrignani, Alessandra Bandera, Federica Sallusto, Antonio Lanzavecchia, Samuele Notarbartolo
{"title":"Dual Activation-Induced Marker Combinations Efficiently Identify and Discern Antigen-Specific and Bystander-Activated Human CD4<sup>+</sup> T Cells.","authors":"Maria Grazia Ceraolo, Maristella Leccese, Antonino Cassotta, Sara Triolo, Mauro Bombaci, Elena Coluccio, Daniele Prati, Riccardo Ungaro, Sergio Abrignani, Alessandra Bandera, Federica Sallusto, Antonio Lanzavecchia, Samuele Notarbartolo","doi":"10.1002/eji.202451404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying activated T lymphocytes and differentiating antigen-specific from bystander T cells is crucial for understanding adaptive immune responses. This study investigates the efficacy of activation-induced markers (AIMs) in distinguishing these cell populations. We measured the expression of commonly used AIMs (CD25, CD38, CD40L, CD69, CD137, HLA-DR, ICOS, and OX40) in an in vitro T-cell activation system and evaluated their sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. We demonstrated that individual AIMs, while specific in detecting activated CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells, poorly discriminate between antigen-specific and bystander activation, as assessed by a discriminative capacity (DC) score we developed. Our analysis revealed that dual AIM combinations significantly enhanced the ability to distinguish antigen-specific from bystander-activated T cells, achieving DC scores above 90%. These combinations also improved positive predictive value and specificity with a modest reduction in sensitivity. The CD25<sup>hi</sup>/ICOS<sup>hi</sup> combination emerged as the most efficient, with an average sensitivity of 84.35%, specificity of 99.7%, and DC score of 90.12%. Validation through T-cell cloning and antigen re-stimulation confirmed the robustness of our predictions. This study provides a practical framework for researchers to optimize strategies for identifying and isolating antigen-specific human CD4<sup>+</sup> T lymphocytes and studying their phenotype, function, and T-cell receptor repertoire.</p>","PeriodicalId":165,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"e202451404"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.202451404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying activated T lymphocytes and differentiating antigen-specific from bystander T cells is crucial for understanding adaptive immune responses. This study investigates the efficacy of activation-induced markers (AIMs) in distinguishing these cell populations. We measured the expression of commonly used AIMs (CD25, CD38, CD40L, CD69, CD137, HLA-DR, ICOS, and OX40) in an in vitro T-cell activation system and evaluated their sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. We demonstrated that individual AIMs, while specific in detecting activated CD4+ T cells, poorly discriminate between antigen-specific and bystander activation, as assessed by a discriminative capacity (DC) score we developed. Our analysis revealed that dual AIM combinations significantly enhanced the ability to distinguish antigen-specific from bystander-activated T cells, achieving DC scores above 90%. These combinations also improved positive predictive value and specificity with a modest reduction in sensitivity. The CD25hi/ICOShi combination emerged as the most efficient, with an average sensitivity of 84.35%, specificity of 99.7%, and DC score of 90.12%. Validation through T-cell cloning and antigen re-stimulation confirmed the robustness of our predictions. This study provides a practical framework for researchers to optimize strategies for identifying and isolating antigen-specific human CD4+ T lymphocytes and studying their phenotype, function, and T-cell receptor repertoire.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
224
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Immunology (EJI) is an official journal of EFIS. Established in 1971, EJI continues to serve the needs of the global immunology community covering basic, translational and clinical research, ranging from adaptive and innate immunity through to vaccines and immunotherapy, cancer, autoimmunity, allergy and more. Mechanistic insights and thought-provoking immunological findings are of interest, as are studies using the latest omics technologies. We offer fast track review for competitive situations, including recently scooped papers, format free submission, transparent and fair peer review and more as detailed in our policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信