Lessons for local oversight of AI in medicine from the regulation of clinical laboratory testing

IF 12.4 1区医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

NPJ Digital Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1038/s41746-024-01369-1

Daniel S. Herman, Jenna T. Reece, Gary E. Weissman

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current regulatory frameworks for artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support (AICDS) are insufficient to ensure safety, effectiveness, and equity at the bedside. The oversight of clinical laboratory testing, which requires federal- and hospital-level involvement, offers many instructive lessons for how to balance safety and innovation and warnings regarding the fragility of this balance. We propose an AICDS oversight framework, modeled after clinical laboratory regulation, that is deliberative, inclusive, and collaborative.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

NPJ Digital Medicine Multiple-

CiteScore

25.10

自引率

3.30%

发文量

170

审稿时长

15 weeks

期刊介绍： npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.