Efficacy of preemptive multimodal analgesia initiated at various time points before total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Qiuru Wang, Xingcheng Li, Jian Hu, Changjun Chen, Jing Yang, Pengde Kang
{"title":"Efficacy of preemptive multimodal analgesia initiated at various time points before total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial","authors":"Qiuru Wang,&nbsp;Xingcheng Li,&nbsp;Jian Hu,&nbsp;Changjun Chen,&nbsp;Jing Yang,&nbsp;Pengde Kang","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05621-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Preemptive multimodal analgesia (PMA) is commonly employed for pain control after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal timing for initiating PMA remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of PMA administered at different time points before TKA.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, 120 patients who underwent TKA were randomized into three groups. PMA (200 mg celecoxib and 150 mg pregabalin administered every 12 h) was initiated 48 h (group A), 24 h (group B), and 1 h (group C) before surgery. The primary outcome was the postoperative administration of morphine hydrochloride as a rescue analgesic. Secondary outcomes included time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative pain assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), functional recovery assessed by knee motion range and ambulation distance, time until hospital discharge, and complication rates.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared with group C, groups A and B exhibited significantly lower morphine consumption within 24 h after surgery, lower total morphine consumption, longer time to first rescue analgesia, and superior range of knee motion on the day of surgery. Groups A and B did not exhibit significant differences in these outcomes. The three groups did not differ significantly in postoperative VAS pain scores, ambulation distance, length of hospital stay, or complication rates.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In comparison with PMA starting at 1 h preoperatively, initiating PMA at 24 and 48 h preoperatively provided better postoperative pain relief. Considering the aim of minimizing the amount of ineffective medication received by patients, initiating PMA at 24 h preoperatively may be a more favorable option for patients undergoing TKA. However, the clinical significance of our results and the optimal starting time for PMA require further investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05621-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Preemptive multimodal analgesia (PMA) is commonly employed for pain control after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal timing for initiating PMA remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of PMA administered at different time points before TKA.

Materials and methods

In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, 120 patients who underwent TKA were randomized into three groups. PMA (200 mg celecoxib and 150 mg pregabalin administered every 12 h) was initiated 48 h (group A), 24 h (group B), and 1 h (group C) before surgery. The primary outcome was the postoperative administration of morphine hydrochloride as a rescue analgesic. Secondary outcomes included time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative pain assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), functional recovery assessed by knee motion range and ambulation distance, time until hospital discharge, and complication rates.

Results

Compared with group C, groups A and B exhibited significantly lower morphine consumption within 24 h after surgery, lower total morphine consumption, longer time to first rescue analgesia, and superior range of knee motion on the day of surgery. Groups A and B did not exhibit significant differences in these outcomes. The three groups did not differ significantly in postoperative VAS pain scores, ambulation distance, length of hospital stay, or complication rates.

Conclusions

In comparison with PMA starting at 1 h preoperatively, initiating PMA at 24 and 48 h preoperatively provided better postoperative pain relief. Considering the aim of minimizing the amount of ineffective medication received by patients, initiating PMA at 24 h preoperatively may be a more favorable option for patients undergoing TKA. However, the clinical significance of our results and the optimal starting time for PMA require further investigation.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信