Richa Ghosh, Geoffrey M. Hopping, Jordan W. Lu, Drew W. Hollyfield, David W. Flaherty
{"title":"Alkene Epoxidation and Oxygen Evolution Reactions Compete for Reactive Surface Oxygen Atoms on Gold Anodes","authors":"Richa Ghosh, Geoffrey M. Hopping, Jordan W. Lu, Drew W. Hollyfield, David W. Flaherty","doi":"10.1021/jacs.4c08948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rates and selectivities for the partial oxidation of organic molecules on reactive electrodes depend on the identity and prevalence of reactive and spectator species. Here, we investigate the mechanism for the epoxidation of 1-hexene (C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>12</sub>) with reactive oxygen species formed by electrochemical oxidation of water (H<sub>2</sub>O) on gold (Au) in an aqueous acetonitrile (CH<sub>3</sub>CN) electrolyte. Cyclic voltammetry measurements demonstrate that oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) evolution competes with C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>12</sub> epoxidation, and the Au surface must oxidize before either reaction occurs. <i>In situ</i> Raman spectroscopy reveals reactive oxygen species and spectators (CH<sub>3</sub>CN) on the active anode as well as species within the electrochemical double layer. The Faradaic efficiencies toward epoxidation and the ratios of epoxide formation to O<sub>2</sub> evolution rates increase linearly with the concentration of C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>12</sub> and depend inversely on the concentration of H<sub>2</sub>O, which agree with analytical expressions that describe rates for reaction between C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>12</sub> and chemisorbed oxygen atoms (O*) and exclude proposals for other forms of reactive oxygen (e.g., O<sub>2</sub>*, OOH*, OH*). These findings show that the epoxidation and O<sub>2</sub> evolution reactions share a set of common steps that form O* through electrochemical H<sub>2</sub>O activation but then diverge. Subsequently, epoxides form when O* reacts with C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>12</sub> through a non-Faradaic process, whereas O<sub>2</sub> evolves when O* reacts with H<sub>2</sub>O through a Faradaic process to form OOH*, which then deprotonates. These differences lead to distinct changes in rates in response to electrode potential, and hence, disparate Tafel slopes. Collectively, these results provide a self-consistent mechanism for C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>12</sub> epoxidation that involves reactive O*.","PeriodicalId":49,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Chemical Society","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Chemical Society","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c08948","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rates and selectivities for the partial oxidation of organic molecules on reactive electrodes depend on the identity and prevalence of reactive and spectator species. Here, we investigate the mechanism for the epoxidation of 1-hexene (C6H12) with reactive oxygen species formed by electrochemical oxidation of water (H2O) on gold (Au) in an aqueous acetonitrile (CH3CN) electrolyte. Cyclic voltammetry measurements demonstrate that oxygen (O2) evolution competes with C6H12 epoxidation, and the Au surface must oxidize before either reaction occurs. In situ Raman spectroscopy reveals reactive oxygen species and spectators (CH3CN) on the active anode as well as species within the electrochemical double layer. The Faradaic efficiencies toward epoxidation and the ratios of epoxide formation to O2 evolution rates increase linearly with the concentration of C6H12 and depend inversely on the concentration of H2O, which agree with analytical expressions that describe rates for reaction between C6H12 and chemisorbed oxygen atoms (O*) and exclude proposals for other forms of reactive oxygen (e.g., O2*, OOH*, OH*). These findings show that the epoxidation and O2 evolution reactions share a set of common steps that form O* through electrochemical H2O activation but then diverge. Subsequently, epoxides form when O* reacts with C6H12 through a non-Faradaic process, whereas O2 evolves when O* reacts with H2O through a Faradaic process to form OOH*, which then deprotonates. These differences lead to distinct changes in rates in response to electrode potential, and hence, disparate Tafel slopes. Collectively, these results provide a self-consistent mechanism for C6H12 epoxidation that involves reactive O*.
期刊介绍:
The flagship journal of the American Chemical Society, known as the Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS), has been a prestigious publication since its establishment in 1879. It holds a preeminent position in the field of chemistry and related interdisciplinary sciences. JACS is committed to disseminating cutting-edge research papers, covering a wide range of topics, and encompasses approximately 19,000 pages of Articles, Communications, and Perspectives annually. With a weekly publication frequency, JACS plays a vital role in advancing the field of chemistry by providing essential research.