Pharmacoeconomic impact of critically ill surgical patients.

J F Dasta, D K Armstrong
{"title":"Pharmacoeconomic impact of critically ill surgical patients.","authors":"J F Dasta,&nbsp;D K Armstrong","doi":"10.1177/106002808802201214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Financial information on 131 patients and drug-related information on 176 patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) were prospectively collected. The average stay was nearly five days and patients received 8.6 drugs per day for a total average exposure of 12.2 different drugs. Antibiotics and analgesics were used in over 90 percent of patients. The patients' diagnoses fit into 53 different diagnosis-related groups (DRG). Hospital costs were significantly greater than DRG payment for an average revenue loss of $17,803 per patient. Patients with a primary diagnosis of sepsis had the largest revenue loss, averaging $54,738. One hundred patients were revenue losers. Total hospital stay was statistically longer than DRG-projected length of stay. Pharmacy charges averaged 13.6 percent of total hospital charges. Patients receiving systemic antifungals, triple antibiotics, catecholamines, and total parenteral nutrition had high hospital and pharmacy costs. This study suggests that ICU patients are costly to hospitals and that drug use is expensive. We suggest that increased pharmacy involvement in the care of ICU patients may help curtail escalating drug costs in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":77709,"journal":{"name":"Drug intelligence & clinical pharmacy","volume":"22 12","pages":"994-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/106002808802201214","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug intelligence & clinical pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/106002808802201214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Financial information on 131 patients and drug-related information on 176 patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) were prospectively collected. The average stay was nearly five days and patients received 8.6 drugs per day for a total average exposure of 12.2 different drugs. Antibiotics and analgesics were used in over 90 percent of patients. The patients' diagnoses fit into 53 different diagnosis-related groups (DRG). Hospital costs were significantly greater than DRG payment for an average revenue loss of $17,803 per patient. Patients with a primary diagnosis of sepsis had the largest revenue loss, averaging $54,738. One hundred patients were revenue losers. Total hospital stay was statistically longer than DRG-projected length of stay. Pharmacy charges averaged 13.6 percent of total hospital charges. Patients receiving systemic antifungals, triple antibiotics, catecholamines, and total parenteral nutrition had high hospital and pharmacy costs. This study suggests that ICU patients are costly to hospitals and that drug use is expensive. We suggest that increased pharmacy involvement in the care of ICU patients may help curtail escalating drug costs in these patients.

外科危重病人的药物经济学影响。
前瞻性地收集了131名患者的财务信息和176名入住外科重症监护病房(ICU)患者的药物相关信息。平均住院时间接近5天,患者每天接受8.6种药物,平均暴露于12.2种不同的药物。超过90%的患者使用了抗生素和止痛药。患者的诊断符合53个不同的诊断相关组(DRG)。每名患者平均收入损失17,803美元,医院费用大大高于DRG支付。初步诊断为败血症的患者收入损失最大,平均为54,738美元。有100名患者收入下降。总住院时间统计上长于drg预测的住院时间。药房费用平均占医院总费用的13.6%。接受全身抗真菌药物、三联抗生素、儿茶酚胺和全肠外营养治疗的患者住院和药房费用较高。本研究表明,ICU患者对医院来说是昂贵的,药物使用也是昂贵的。我们建议增加药房参与ICU患者的护理可能有助于减少这些患者不断上升的药物成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信