Assessment of factors implicated in bone fusion after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar intervertebral fusion.

Zheng Huang, Xialin Li, Weihong Yi, Junfeng Gong, Yue Zhou, Yu Tang
{"title":"Assessment of factors implicated in bone fusion after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar intervertebral fusion.","authors":"Zheng Huang, Xialin Li, Weihong Yi, Junfeng Gong, Yue Zhou, Yu Tang","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2024.23142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lumbar spinal fusion is a common procedure for treating spinal degenerative diseases. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF) is a minimally invasive technique that has gained popularity. However, the factors influencing fusion success rates after PELIF have not been well-studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 96 patients who underwent single-level PELIF for degenerative pathologies between 2018 and 2020. Fusion was evaluated using thin-slice computed tomography scans at 12 months by 2 independent radiologists and defined as no detectable lucency between bone and graft. Patients were categorized into fusion and non-fusion groups. Data on age, operative time, blood loss, drainage, hospital stay, surgical level, osteoporosis, endplateitis, body mass index, lumbar curvature, and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) use were collected. Univariate tests (chi-square, Student’s t-test, and analysis of variance) were employed to compare factors between groups. Significant factors were included in a multivariate logistic regression model with fusion as the dependent variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall fusion success rate was 85.6% (86 fusion and 10 non-fusion). Univariate analysis revealed significant di!erences in age, osteoporosis, hypertension, diabetes, endplateitis, and BMP use between groups. Multivariate analysis identified osteoporosis (odds ratio (OR)=5.44, 95% CI, P < .05) and end-plate osteochondritis (OR=10.449, 95% CI, P < .05) as independent risk factors for non-fusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of BMP and endplateitis are significant factors that a!ect bone fusion outcomes after the PELIF procedure. These factors should be taken into account in order to improve postoperative bone fusion.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, Therapeutic Study</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":"1 1","pages":"353-357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2024.23142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Lumbar spinal fusion is a common procedure for treating spinal degenerative diseases. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF) is a minimally invasive technique that has gained popularity. However, the factors influencing fusion success rates after PELIF have not been well-studied.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 96 patients who underwent single-level PELIF for degenerative pathologies between 2018 and 2020. Fusion was evaluated using thin-slice computed tomography scans at 12 months by 2 independent radiologists and defined as no detectable lucency between bone and graft. Patients were categorized into fusion and non-fusion groups. Data on age, operative time, blood loss, drainage, hospital stay, surgical level, osteoporosis, endplateitis, body mass index, lumbar curvature, and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) use were collected. Univariate tests (chi-square, Student’s t-test, and analysis of variance) were employed to compare factors between groups. Significant factors were included in a multivariate logistic regression model with fusion as the dependent variable.

Results: The overall fusion success rate was 85.6% (86 fusion and 10 non-fusion). Univariate analysis revealed significant di!erences in age, osteoporosis, hypertension, diabetes, endplateitis, and BMP use between groups. Multivariate analysis identified osteoporosis (odds ratio (OR)=5.44, 95% CI, P < .05) and end-plate osteochondritis (OR=10.449, 95% CI, P < .05) as independent risk factors for non-fusion.

Conclusion: The use of BMP and endplateitis are significant factors that a!ect bone fusion outcomes after the PELIF procedure. These factors should be taken into account in order to improve postoperative bone fusion.

Level of evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study

经皮内窥镜腰椎椎间融合术后影响骨融合的因素评估。
腰椎融合术是治疗脊柱退行性疾病的常用手术。经皮内窥镜腰椎椎体间融合术(PELIF)是一种微创技术,已经得到了广泛的应用。然而,影响PELIF术后融合成功率的因素尚未得到充分研究。这项单中心回顾性研究回顾了2018年至2020年期间96名因退行性病理接受单级别PELIF治疗的患者的医疗记录。2名独立放射科医生在12个月时使用薄层计算机断层扫描评估融合,并将其定义为骨和移植物之间没有可检测到的透光。患者分为融合组和非融合组。收集年龄、手术时间、出血量、引流、住院时间、手术水平、骨质疏松症、血小板终末炎、体重指数、腰椎曲度和骨形态发生蛋白(BMP)使用的数据。采用单因素检验(卡方检验、学生t检验和方差分析)比较组间因素。以融合为因变量的多变量logistic回归模型纳入显著因素。总体融合成功率为85.6%(融合86例,未融合10例)。单因素分析显示,两组之间在年龄、骨质疏松、高血压、糖尿病、血小板终末炎和BMP使用方面存在显著差异。多因素分析发现骨质疏松症(优势比(OR)=5.44, 95% CI, P < 0.05)和终板骨软骨炎(OR=10.449, 95% CI, P < 0.05)是不融合的独立危险因素。使用BMP和终板炎是影响PELIF手术后骨融合结果的重要因素。为了改善术后骨融合,应考虑这些因素。四级,治疗性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信