Unbound Ceftriaxone Concentrations in Plasma Measured Using Ultrafiltration Versus Equilibrium Dialysis: A Short Communication.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Matthias Gijsen, Dorian Vanneste, Pieter Annaert, Yves Debaveye, Joost Wauters, Isabel Spriet
{"title":"Unbound Ceftriaxone Concentrations in Plasma Measured Using Ultrafiltration Versus Equilibrium Dialysis: A Short Communication.","authors":"Matthias Gijsen, Dorian Vanneste, Pieter Annaert, Yves Debaveye, Joost Wauters, Isabel Spriet","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ceftriaxone is a first-line beta-lactam antibiotic used in diverse clinical settings. Owing to pharmacokinetic alterations, ceftriaxone therapeutic drug monitoring is currently recommended for patients in the intensive care unit. Ultrafiltration is typically used to measure unbound ceftriaxone concentrations, as it is less costly and time-consuming compared with equilibrium dialysis. However, the reference method, equilibrium dialysis, has not been compared with equilibrium dialysis for ceftriaxone to measure the unbound ceftriaxone concentrations. Therefore, unbound ceftriaxone fractions measured by ultrafiltration versus equilibrium dialysis were compared in patients in the intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Total and unbound ceftriaxone plasma fractions were measured by ultrafiltration (9500g at 37°C for 30 minutes) and equilibrium dialysis (12 kDa, 37°C for 4 hours) in 32 plasma samples from 28 patients who were critically ill collected during a previous prospective pharmacokinetic study. Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to evaluate the agreements between both methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median (range) total ceftriaxone plasma concentration was 108.6 (5.2-233) mg/L. The median unbound concentration measured by equilibrium dialysis and ultrafiltration was 14.5 (0.7-52.9) and 23.3 (0.9-79.2) mg/L, respectively, showing a significant difference. Passing-Bablok regression analysis revealed significant proportional and systematic bias. This result was confirmed by Bland-Altman analysis, with a mean relative bias of 43.3% and wide agreement limits (-21% to 108%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrafiltration substantially overestimates the unbound ceftriaxone fraction compared with equilibrium dialysis at 37°C. It is important to report methodological details and consider this information when interpreting unbound fractions of ceftriaxone and other drugs. These findings may impact the therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftriaxone.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ceftriaxone is a first-line beta-lactam antibiotic used in diverse clinical settings. Owing to pharmacokinetic alterations, ceftriaxone therapeutic drug monitoring is currently recommended for patients in the intensive care unit. Ultrafiltration is typically used to measure unbound ceftriaxone concentrations, as it is less costly and time-consuming compared with equilibrium dialysis. However, the reference method, equilibrium dialysis, has not been compared with equilibrium dialysis for ceftriaxone to measure the unbound ceftriaxone concentrations. Therefore, unbound ceftriaxone fractions measured by ultrafiltration versus equilibrium dialysis were compared in patients in the intensive care unit.

Methods: Total and unbound ceftriaxone plasma fractions were measured by ultrafiltration (9500g at 37°C for 30 minutes) and equilibrium dialysis (12 kDa, 37°C for 4 hours) in 32 plasma samples from 28 patients who were critically ill collected during a previous prospective pharmacokinetic study. Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to evaluate the agreements between both methods.

Results: The median (range) total ceftriaxone plasma concentration was 108.6 (5.2-233) mg/L. The median unbound concentration measured by equilibrium dialysis and ultrafiltration was 14.5 (0.7-52.9) and 23.3 (0.9-79.2) mg/L, respectively, showing a significant difference. Passing-Bablok regression analysis revealed significant proportional and systematic bias. This result was confirmed by Bland-Altman analysis, with a mean relative bias of 43.3% and wide agreement limits (-21% to 108%).

Conclusions: Ultrafiltration substantially overestimates the unbound ceftriaxone fraction compared with equilibrium dialysis at 37°C. It is important to report methodological details and consider this information when interpreting unbound fractions of ceftriaxone and other drugs. These findings may impact the therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftriaxone.

使用超滤与平衡透析测量血浆中非结合头孢曲松浓度:短通信。
背景:头孢曲松是一线β -内酰胺类抗生素,用于多种临床环境。由于药代动力学的改变,头孢曲松治疗药物监测目前被推荐用于重症监护病房的患者。超滤通常用于测量非结合头孢曲松浓度,因为与平衡透析相比,它成本更低,耗时更短。然而,尚未将参考方法平衡透析与头孢曲松平衡透析进行比较,以测量头孢曲松未结合浓度。因此,在重症监护病房的患者中,超滤和平衡透析测量的非结合头孢曲松馏分进行了比较。方法:采用超滤法(9500g, 37°C, 30分钟)和平衡透析法(12 kDa, 37°C, 4小时)对28例危重患者的32份血浆样本进行头孢曲松总血浆和非结合血浆组分的测定。采用passingbablok回归和Bland-Altman分析来评价两种方法之间的一致性。结果:头孢曲松总血药浓度中位(范围)为108.6 (5.2 ~ 233)mg/L。平衡透析和超滤测得的中位非结合浓度分别为14.5(0.7-52.9)和23.3 (0.9-79.2)mg/L,差异有统计学意义。Passing-Bablok回归分析显示显著的比例偏差和系统偏差。Bland-Altman分析证实了这一结果,平均相对偏差为43.3%,一致性范围很广(-21%至108%)。结论:与37°C的平衡透析相比,超滤大大高估了未结合的头孢曲松组分。在解释头孢曲松和其他药物的未结合部分时,报告方法学细节和考虑这些信息是很重要的。这些发现可能会影响头孢曲松的治疗药物监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
213
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of pharmacologists, clinical chemists, laboratorians, pharmacists, drug researchers and toxicologists. It fosters the exchange of knowledge among the various disciplines–clinical pharmacology, pathology, toxicology, analytical chemistry–that share a common interest in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. The journal presents studies detailing the various factors that affect the rate and extent drugs are absorbed, metabolized, and excreted. Regular features include review articles on specific classes of drugs, original articles, case reports, technical notes, and continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信