Speech and language therapist-led clinics for low-risk suspected head and neck cancer referrals: A qualitative study of ear, nose and throat surgeons’ views

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Louise C. Occomore-Kent, John C. Hardman, Justin W. G. Roe, Paula Bradley, Paul N. Carding, Joanne M. Patterson
{"title":"Speech and language therapist-led clinics for low-risk suspected head and neck cancer referrals: A qualitative study of ear, nose and throat surgeons’ views","authors":"Louise C. Occomore-Kent,&nbsp;John C. Hardman,&nbsp;Justin W. G. Roe,&nbsp;Paula Bradley,&nbsp;Paul N. Carding,&nbsp;Joanne M. Patterson","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.13137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Over 200,000 patients are referred onto the suspected head and neck cancer (HNC) pathway annually in the UK, with around 3% receiving a cancer diagnosis. With new HNC advancements in identifying patients at low risk of a cancer diagnosis, one proposal is a speech and language therapy (SLT)-led first point of contact clinic for low-risk patients presenting with voice or swallowing symptoms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To explore ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgeons’ views regarding this model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials &amp; Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study used a qualitative study design using semi-structured interviews. Transcribed responses were analysed using thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Outcomes &amp; Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 11 UK ENT surgeons participated. Themes included the positives and challenges of the proposed model; existing facilitators that increase the likelihood of success; and the requirements for successful implementation. Service variation impacted level of interest. Waiting times were problematic at some sites more than others; SLT workforce issues were of differing prevalence; SLT competence and interest differed; and support from organizational leaders varied. Participants’ personal views also varied, for example, acceptability of the model to patients, or what governance structure is required. There was no single SLT-led clinic model suitable for all centres; however, some general principles were identified to inform further evaluation and implementation of this model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions &amp; Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Principles included the deployment of SLTs experienced in laryngeal examination and flexible nasendoscopy; dedicated job plans and workforce; professional and regulatory body recognition and support; and clear training, supervision structure and job description for the role. Service outcomes, training protocol and competencies require robust evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What is already known on this subject</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, a risk calculator tool was developed to identify patients at highest risk of cancer who were referred to the 2-week-wait (2ww) ENT pathway. These patients require urgent face to face ENT assessment. Lower risk patients with voice and swallowing difficulties still require management of their symptoms and an SLT-led clinic model is one potential solution for this population. While SLTs’ views of this model have been explored with a UK-wide survey and focus groups, ENT surgeons’ perspectives are yet to be investigated.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What this study adds to the existing knowledge</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>This study explores ENT surgeons’ views regarding SLT-led clinics for patients who are referred through the 2ww ENT pathway, stratified as being at low risk of cancer, and with voice and/or swallowing symptoms of likely benign aetiology. Participants shared many positive perceptions of the clinic along with factors that they felt would enhance its success (facilitators). Key requirements for the success of this clinic model were also highlighted, along with challenges that need to be addressed.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What are the practical and clinical implications of this work?</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The need for this clinic model varied by centre. However, general principles included the importance of a dedicated workforce with pre-existing relevant expertise; and a clear role profile, training process and competencies framework. Professional, statutory and regulatory bodies’ recognition of the role is required, and robust evaluation of the model is necessary.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.13137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Over 200,000 patients are referred onto the suspected head and neck cancer (HNC) pathway annually in the UK, with around 3% receiving a cancer diagnosis. With new HNC advancements in identifying patients at low risk of a cancer diagnosis, one proposal is a speech and language therapy (SLT)-led first point of contact clinic for low-risk patients presenting with voice or swallowing symptoms.

Aims

To explore ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgeons’ views regarding this model.

Materials & Methods

The study used a qualitative study design using semi-structured interviews. Transcribed responses were analysed using thematic analysis.

Outcomes & Results

A total of 11 UK ENT surgeons participated. Themes included the positives and challenges of the proposed model; existing facilitators that increase the likelihood of success; and the requirements for successful implementation. Service variation impacted level of interest. Waiting times were problematic at some sites more than others; SLT workforce issues were of differing prevalence; SLT competence and interest differed; and support from organizational leaders varied. Participants’ personal views also varied, for example, acceptability of the model to patients, or what governance structure is required. There was no single SLT-led clinic model suitable for all centres; however, some general principles were identified to inform further evaluation and implementation of this model.

Conclusions & Implications

Principles included the deployment of SLTs experienced in laryngeal examination and flexible nasendoscopy; dedicated job plans and workforce; professional and regulatory body recognition and support; and clear training, supervision structure and job description for the role. Service outcomes, training protocol and competencies require robust evaluation.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on this subject

  • During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, a risk calculator tool was developed to identify patients at highest risk of cancer who were referred to the 2-week-wait (2ww) ENT pathway. These patients require urgent face to face ENT assessment. Lower risk patients with voice and swallowing difficulties still require management of their symptoms and an SLT-led clinic model is one potential solution for this population. While SLTs’ views of this model have been explored with a UK-wide survey and focus groups, ENT surgeons’ perspectives are yet to be investigated.

What this study adds to the existing knowledge

  • This study explores ENT surgeons’ views regarding SLT-led clinics for patients who are referred through the 2ww ENT pathway, stratified as being at low risk of cancer, and with voice and/or swallowing symptoms of likely benign aetiology. Participants shared many positive perceptions of the clinic along with factors that they felt would enhance its success (facilitators). Key requirements for the success of this clinic model were also highlighted, along with challenges that need to be addressed.

What are the practical and clinical implications of this work?

  • The need for this clinic model varied by centre. However, general principles included the importance of a dedicated workforce with pre-existing relevant expertise; and a clear role profile, training process and competencies framework. Professional, statutory and regulatory bodies’ recognition of the role is required, and robust evaluation of the model is necessary.
语音和语言治疗师领导的低风险疑似头颈癌转诊诊所:耳鼻喉外科医生观点的定性研究。
背景:在英国,每年有超过20万患者被转介到疑似头颈癌(HNC)途径,其中约3%的患者接受了癌症诊断。随着HNC在识别低风险癌症诊断患者方面的新进展,一项建议是为出现声音或吞咽症状的低风险患者提供言语和语言治疗(SLT)主导的第一接触点诊所。目的:探讨耳鼻喉外科医生对该模型的看法。材料与方法:本研究采用半结构化访谈的定性研究设计。使用专题分析对记录的回答进行分析。结果和结果:共有11名英国耳鼻喉外科医生参与。主题包括拟议模式的优点和挑战;增加成功可能性的现有促进因素;以及成功实施的要求。服务变化影响兴趣水平。一些站点的等待时间问题更严重;SLT劳动力问题的普遍程度不同;外语学习能力和兴趣存在差异;组织领导人的支持也各不相同。参与者的个人观点也各不相同,例如,患者对模型的接受程度,或者需要什么样的治理结构。没有适合所有中心的单一slt主导的临床模型;但是,确定了一些一般原则,以便为该模型的进一步评估和实现提供信息。结论和意义:原则包括在喉检查和柔性鼻内窥镜检查中经验丰富的slt的部署;专门的工作计划和员工队伍;专业和监管机构的认可和支持;并明确培训、监督结构和职位描述。服务成果、培训方案和能力需要强有力的评估。本文补充的内容:在SARS-CoV-2大流行期间,开发了一种风险计算器工具,用于识别被转至2周等待(2ww)耳鼻喉科途径的癌症风险最高的患者。这些患者需要紧急面对面的耳鼻喉科评估。有声音和吞咽困难的低风险患者仍然需要控制他们的症状,slt主导的临床模式是这一人群的一个潜在解决方案。虽然slt对这种模式的看法已经通过英国范围的调查和焦点小组进行了探讨,但耳鼻喉外科医生的观点尚未得到调查。本研究探讨了耳鼻喉外科医生对通过2ww耳鼻喉科途径转诊的患者的slt主导诊所的看法,这些患者被划分为低癌症风险,并且有可能是良性病因的声音和/或吞咽症状。参与者分享了许多对诊所的积极看法,以及他们认为会提高诊所成功的因素(促进因素)。还强调了这种诊所模式取得成功的关键要求,以及需要解决的挑战。这项工作的实际和临床意义是什么?对这种临床模型的需求因中心而异。但是,一般原则包括必须有一支具有预先存在的相关专门知识的专门工作队伍;以及清晰的角色描述、培训流程和能力框架。专业、法定和监管机构必须承认这一角色,对该模式进行强有力的评估也是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信