Development of a new breath collection method for analyzing volatile organic compounds from intubated mouse models.

IF 2.5 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Biology Methods and Protocols Pub Date : 2024-11-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/biomethods/bpae087
Alastair Taylor, Sylvia Blum, Madeleine Ball, Owen Birch, Hsuan Chou, Julia Greenwood, Shane Swann, Lara Pocock, Max Allsworth, Billy Boyle, Kerstin Geillinger-Kaestle
{"title":"Development of a new breath collection method for analyzing volatile organic compounds from intubated mouse models.","authors":"Alastair Taylor, Sylvia Blum, Madeleine Ball, Owen Birch, Hsuan Chou, Julia Greenwood, Shane Swann, Lara Pocock, Max Allsworth, Billy Boyle, Kerstin Geillinger-Kaestle","doi":"10.1093/biomethods/bpae087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A new pre-clinical method for capturing breath samples from intubated mice is presented. This method significantly reduces background levels, allowing more accurate measurements of VOCs originating from the breath (\"on-breath\") as opposed to background contamination. The method was developed by integrating industry-standard volatile-capturing sorbent tubes with respiratory mechanics measurement equipment (flexiVent<sup>®</sup>), resulting in a mouse breath sample that can be transported and analyzed by TD-GC-MS and other central lab technologies. Using the methodology, the discrimination between on-breath VOCs from background compounds provides a cleaner dataset, which can accelerate the validation of VOCs identified from mouse models and their translation to clinical trials. Three metrics were developed to identify on-breath VOCs, with 22 identified using Type 1 (50% of the breath samples exceeding three standard deviations above the mean signal of the system blanks), 34 with Type 2 (<i>P</i>-value ≤ .05 between paired breath and blank samples), and 61 with Type 3 (ROC-AUC value ≥ 0.8 to differentiate between breath and blank samples). The number of compounds seen at elevated levels on mouse breath was quantified and compared to the levels seen on human breath samples to compare methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36528,"journal":{"name":"Biology Methods and Protocols","volume":"9 1","pages":"bpae087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpae087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A new pre-clinical method for capturing breath samples from intubated mice is presented. This method significantly reduces background levels, allowing more accurate measurements of VOCs originating from the breath ("on-breath") as opposed to background contamination. The method was developed by integrating industry-standard volatile-capturing sorbent tubes with respiratory mechanics measurement equipment (flexiVent®), resulting in a mouse breath sample that can be transported and analyzed by TD-GC-MS and other central lab technologies. Using the methodology, the discrimination between on-breath VOCs from background compounds provides a cleaner dataset, which can accelerate the validation of VOCs identified from mouse models and their translation to clinical trials. Three metrics were developed to identify on-breath VOCs, with 22 identified using Type 1 (50% of the breath samples exceeding three standard deviations above the mean signal of the system blanks), 34 with Type 2 (P-value ≤ .05 between paired breath and blank samples), and 61 with Type 3 (ROC-AUC value ≥ 0.8 to differentiate between breath and blank samples). The number of compounds seen at elevated levels on mouse breath was quantified and compared to the levels seen on human breath samples to compare methodologies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology Methods and Protocols
Biology Methods and Protocols Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信