Phenotype of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients with positive anticentromere antibodies: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Marco Binda, Augusta Ortolan, Beatrice Moccaldi, Mariangela Salvato, Anna Cuberli, Roberto Padoan, Andrea Doria, Elisabetta Zanatta
{"title":"Phenotype of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients with positive anticentromere antibodies: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Marco Binda, Augusta Ortolan, Beatrice Moccaldi, Mariangela Salvato, Anna Cuberli, Roberto Padoan, Andrea Doria, Elisabetta Zanatta","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Anticentromere antibodies (ACA) are typically found in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc), whereas patients with anti-topoisomerase I antibodies (ATA) usually exhibit diffuse cutaneous involvement (dcSSc). We aimed to investigate the clinical phenotype and outcome of ACA-dcSSc.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted (January 1970 to April 2023) across MEDLINE, Scopus and OVID, to define whether SSc patients (population) within the ACA-dcSSc subset (exposure) had higher/lower risk for major organ involvement (interstitial lung disease-ILD, pulmonary hypertension-PH, primary myocardial involvement-PMI, scleroderma renal crisis-SRC) and mortality (outcomes) compared to ACA-lcSSc and ATA-dcSSc. Inclusion criteria were: 1) adult SSc patients with identifiable demographic and clinical features by subtype; 2) observational studies. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare odds ratios (OR) for major organ involvement, and the 5- and 10-year mortality of ACA-dcSSc with the other subsets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1570 hits, six articles were included, identifying 177 ACA-dcSSc patients. In ACA-dcSSc, ILD was more frequent than in ACA-lcSSc (OR 2.60; 95 %CI 1.39-4.87) but less frequent compared to ATA-dcSSc (OR 0.17; 95 %CI 0.10-0.29). ACA-dcSSc patients had a higher prevalence of PH vs. both conventional subsets; PMI and SRC were more frequent in ACA-dcSSc compared to ACA-lcSSc, and similar to ATA-dcSSc. While 5-year survival rates were comparable among the subsets, ACA-dcSSc patients exhibited a lower 10-year mortality than ATA-dcSSc (OR 0.42; 95 %CI 0.2-0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although uncommon, the ACA-dcSSc subset appears to have a distinct clinical phenotype, with a better prognosis than ATA-dcSSc.</p>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"70 ","pages":"152606"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Anticentromere antibodies (ACA) are typically found in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc), whereas patients with anti-topoisomerase I antibodies (ATA) usually exhibit diffuse cutaneous involvement (dcSSc). We aimed to investigate the clinical phenotype and outcome of ACA-dcSSc.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted (January 1970 to April 2023) across MEDLINE, Scopus and OVID, to define whether SSc patients (population) within the ACA-dcSSc subset (exposure) had higher/lower risk for major organ involvement (interstitial lung disease-ILD, pulmonary hypertension-PH, primary myocardial involvement-PMI, scleroderma renal crisis-SRC) and mortality (outcomes) compared to ACA-lcSSc and ATA-dcSSc. Inclusion criteria were: 1) adult SSc patients with identifiable demographic and clinical features by subtype; 2) observational studies. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare odds ratios (OR) for major organ involvement, and the 5- and 10-year mortality of ACA-dcSSc with the other subsets.

Results: Out of 1570 hits, six articles were included, identifying 177 ACA-dcSSc patients. In ACA-dcSSc, ILD was more frequent than in ACA-lcSSc (OR 2.60; 95 %CI 1.39-4.87) but less frequent compared to ATA-dcSSc (OR 0.17; 95 %CI 0.10-0.29). ACA-dcSSc patients had a higher prevalence of PH vs. both conventional subsets; PMI and SRC were more frequent in ACA-dcSSc compared to ACA-lcSSc, and similar to ATA-dcSSc. While 5-year survival rates were comparable among the subsets, ACA-dcSSc patients exhibited a lower 10-year mortality than ATA-dcSSc (OR 0.42; 95 %CI 0.2-0.85).

Conclusion: Although uncommon, the ACA-dcSSc subset appears to have a distinct clinical phenotype, with a better prognosis than ATA-dcSSc.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信