Chatbots in Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Surgery: How Accurate Are the Responses?

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000002824
Anirejuoritse Bafor, Daryn Strub, Søren Kold, Christopher A Iobst, Kirsten Tulchin-Francis
{"title":"Chatbots in Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Surgery: How Accurate Are the Responses?","authors":"Anirejuoritse Bafor, Daryn Strub, Søren Kold, Christopher A Iobst, Kirsten Tulchin-Francis","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence-based language model chatbots are being increasingly used as a quick reference for healthcare related information. In pediatric orthopaedics, studies have shown that a significant percentage of parents use online search engines to find out more about the health condition of their children. Several studies have investigated the accuracy of the responses generated from these chatbots. The accuracy of responses with these programs in limb lengthening and reconstruction surgery has not previously been determined. Our goal was to assess the response accuracy of 3 different chatbots (ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Copilot) to questions related to limb reconstruction surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of 23 common questions related to limb reconstruction surgery was generated and posed to the 3 chatbots on 3 separate occasions. Responses were randomized and platform-blinded before rating by 3 orthopaedic surgeons. The 4-point rating system reported by Mika et al was used to grade all responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that ChatGPT had the best response accuracy score of all 3 chatbots while Microsoft Copilot had the worst score, and this finding was consistent among all 3 raters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using the Response Accuracy Score, the responses from ChatGPT were determined to be satisfactory, requiring minimal clarification, while responses from Microsoft Copilot required moderate clarification.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV-diagnostic.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":"45 1","pages":"33-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence-based language model chatbots are being increasingly used as a quick reference for healthcare related information. In pediatric orthopaedics, studies have shown that a significant percentage of parents use online search engines to find out more about the health condition of their children. Several studies have investigated the accuracy of the responses generated from these chatbots. The accuracy of responses with these programs in limb lengthening and reconstruction surgery has not previously been determined. Our goal was to assess the response accuracy of 3 different chatbots (ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Copilot) to questions related to limb reconstruction surgery.

Methods: A list of 23 common questions related to limb reconstruction surgery was generated and posed to the 3 chatbots on 3 separate occasions. Responses were randomized and platform-blinded before rating by 3 orthopaedic surgeons. The 4-point rating system reported by Mika et al was used to grade all responses.

Results: We found that ChatGPT had the best response accuracy score of all 3 chatbots while Microsoft Copilot had the worst score, and this finding was consistent among all 3 raters.

Conclusions: Using the Response Accuracy Score, the responses from ChatGPT were determined to be satisfactory, requiring minimal clarification, while responses from Microsoft Copilot required moderate clarification.

Level of evidence: Level IV-diagnostic.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信