A quantitative PCR to detect non-toxigenic Clostridioides difficile.

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Microbiology spectrum Pub Date : 2025-01-07 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1128/spectrum.01608-24
Khurshida Begum, Hubert C Chua, M Jahangir Alam, Kevin W Garey, Jinhee Jo
{"title":"A quantitative PCR to detect non-toxigenic <i>Clostridioides difficile</i>.","authors":"Khurshida Begum, Hubert C Chua, M Jahangir Alam, Kevin W Garey, Jinhee Jo","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.01608-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Clostridioides difficile</i> species lacking toxin genes (non-toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> or NTCD) may confer protection against CDI. However, current diagnostic tests detect either toxin proteins or toxin genes and cannot detect NTCD. This study developed a molecular testing method that uniquely identified NTCD and assessed its prevalence in a clinical cohort. A quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay was developed and validated using reference strains. Analytic sensitivity was determined using DNA from reference NTCD strains, and qPCR efficiency was assessed using the slope of the standard curves of DNA dilutions. A random selection of 95 clinical stool samples, tested using the GDH enzyme and toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA), was used to evaluate the prevalence of NTCD in hospitalized patients tested for CDI. The KB-1/KB-2 primers and probe designed were specific for NTCD strains and did not amplify with toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> or other related strains. The NTCD qPCR assay analytical sensitivity was linear between 3 × 10<sup>1</sup> and 3 × 10<sup>6</sup> gDNA (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.999; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). No NTCD was found in 25 GDH-EIA -/- samples compared to 5 of 25 (20%) GDH-EIA +/- samples and 2 of 23 (8.7%) GDH-EIA +/+ samples. Of samples detected with NTCD, median NTCD DNA was 33,039 (IQR: 22.449-45.688) in GDH-EIA +/- samples and 370 [IQR: 159-583] in GDH-EIA +/+ samples. The new qPCR NTCD assay identified NTCD colonization in 7% of hospitalized patients tested for CDI. This NTCD assay may have important implications for diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship as colonization with NTCD strains may offer protection against CDI.IMPORTANCECurrent diagnostic strategies do not detect non-toxigenic <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> (NTCD) strains, which may provide protection against <i>C. difficile</i> infection (CDI). Detecting these strains is critical as it underscores the importance of avoiding unnecessary antibiotic treatment in patients colonized with NTCD. To better guide clinical decisions and enhance the understanding of NTCD epidemiology, molecular assays that specifically target non-coding regions unique to NTCD strains are needed. In this study, we developed and validated a qPCR assay capable of uniquely identifying NTCD strains. This innovative assay holds significant potential for applications in public health, infection control, diagnostic, and therapeutic strategies related to CDI.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0160824"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01608-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile species lacking toxin genes (non-toxigenic C. difficile or NTCD) may confer protection against CDI. However, current diagnostic tests detect either toxin proteins or toxin genes and cannot detect NTCD. This study developed a molecular testing method that uniquely identified NTCD and assessed its prevalence in a clinical cohort. A quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay was developed and validated using reference strains. Analytic sensitivity was determined using DNA from reference NTCD strains, and qPCR efficiency was assessed using the slope of the standard curves of DNA dilutions. A random selection of 95 clinical stool samples, tested using the GDH enzyme and toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA), was used to evaluate the prevalence of NTCD in hospitalized patients tested for CDI. The KB-1/KB-2 primers and probe designed were specific for NTCD strains and did not amplify with toxigenic C. difficile or other related strains. The NTCD qPCR assay analytical sensitivity was linear between 3 × 101 and 3 × 106 gDNA (R2 = 0.999; P < 0.0001). No NTCD was found in 25 GDH-EIA -/- samples compared to 5 of 25 (20%) GDH-EIA +/- samples and 2 of 23 (8.7%) GDH-EIA +/+ samples. Of samples detected with NTCD, median NTCD DNA was 33,039 (IQR: 22.449-45.688) in GDH-EIA +/- samples and 370 [IQR: 159-583] in GDH-EIA +/+ samples. The new qPCR NTCD assay identified NTCD colonization in 7% of hospitalized patients tested for CDI. This NTCD assay may have important implications for diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship as colonization with NTCD strains may offer protection against CDI.IMPORTANCECurrent diagnostic strategies do not detect non-toxigenic Clostridioides difficile (NTCD) strains, which may provide protection against C. difficile infection (CDI). Detecting these strains is critical as it underscores the importance of avoiding unnecessary antibiotic treatment in patients colonized with NTCD. To better guide clinical decisions and enhance the understanding of NTCD epidemiology, molecular assays that specifically target non-coding regions unique to NTCD strains are needed. In this study, we developed and validated a qPCR assay capable of uniquely identifying NTCD strains. This innovative assay holds significant potential for applications in public health, infection control, diagnostic, and therapeutic strategies related to CDI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

非产毒艰难梭菌的定量PCR检测。
缺乏毒素基因的艰难梭菌物种(非产毒素艰难梭菌或NTCD)可能具有抗CDI的保护作用。然而,目前的诊断检测只能检测毒素蛋白或毒素基因,而不能检测非传染性疾病。本研究开发了一种分子检测方法,可以独特地识别NTCD并评估其在临床队列中的患病率。建立了一种定量PCR (qPCR)方法,并使用参考菌株进行了验证。采用NTCD参考菌株DNA测定分析灵敏度,采用DNA稀释标准曲线斜率评价qPCR效率。随机选择95份临床粪便样本,使用GDH酶和毒素酶免疫测定法(EIA)进行检测,用于评估住院CDI患者中NTCD的患病率。所设计的KB-1/KB-2引物和探针对NTCD菌株具有特异性,不能与产毒艰难梭菌或其他相关菌株扩增。NTCD qPCR检测的分析灵敏度在3 × 101 ~ 3 × 106 gDNA之间呈线性关系(R2 = 0.999;P < 0.0001)。25份GDH-EIA -/-样本中未发现NTCD,而25份GDH-EIA +/-样本中有5份(20%)未发现NTCD, 23份GDH-EIA +/+样本中有2份(8.7%)未发现NTCD。在检测到NTCD的样本中,GDH-EIA +/-样本的NTCD DNA中位数为33,039 (IQR: 22.449-45.688), GDH-EIA +/+样本的NTCD DNA中位数为370 (IQR: 159-583)。新的qPCR NTCD检测在7%的CDI住院患者中鉴定出NTCD定植。这种NTCD检测可能对诊断和抗菌管理具有重要意义,因为NTCD菌株的定植可能提供对CDI的保护。目前的诊断策略没有检测出非产毒性艰难梭菌(NTCD)菌株,这可能提供对艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的保护。检测这些菌株是至关重要的,因为它强调了避免对非传染性疾病定植的患者进行不必要的抗生素治疗的重要性。为了更好地指导临床决策和加强对非传染性疾病流行病学的了解,需要针对非传染性疾病菌株特有的非编码区进行分子检测。在这项研究中,我们开发并验证了一种能够唯一识别NTCD菌株的qPCR方法。这种创新的检测方法在与CDI相关的公共卫生、感染控制、诊断和治疗策略方面具有重要的应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信