Efficacy and safety of a generic remifentanil formulation versus fentanyl and Ultiva during general anaesthesia: A phase III, prospective, multi-centric, observer-blind, randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-26 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_289_24
Indrani Hemantkumar, Ashok Kumar Swain, Manjaree Mishra, Swati Singh, Challakere Lakshminarain Gurudatt, Janampet Bekkam Giridhar
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of a generic remifentanil formulation versus fentanyl and Ultiva during general anaesthesia: A phase III, prospective, multi-centric, observer-blind, randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Indrani Hemantkumar, Ashok Kumar Swain, Manjaree Mishra, Swati Singh, Challakere Lakshminarain Gurudatt, Janampet Bekkam Giridhar","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_289_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Remifentanil and fentanyl are potent opioid analgesics commonly used during surgery due to their distinct pharmacological profiles. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a generic remifentanil (test drug) with fentanyl and Ultiva (innovator formulation) during general anaesthesia in the Indian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase III, multi-centre (n = 13), randomised, three-arm, comparative study was conducted from 24 November 2021 to 31 March 2022. Eligible subjects scheduled for elective therapeutic and diagnostic surgical procedures (n = 314) were randomised into generic remifentanil, Ultiva, and fentanyl groups. An independent anaesthetist blinded to treatment allocation assessed efficacy and safety parameters. The primary efficacy endpoint was haemodynamic response during specific activities (endotracheal intubation, skin incision, skin closure, and extubation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study groups exhibited no significant differences in demographic and baseline characteristics. Heart rate was similar between the remifentanil and Ultiva groups measured during laryngeal intubation, skin incision, skin closure, and extubation (<i>P</i> > 0.05 in all four procedures). Heart rate was significantly higher in the fentanyl group in comparison to the remifentanil group during laryngeal intubation (<i>P</i> = 0.035), skin incision (<i>P</i> = 0.017), skin closure (<i>P</i> = 0.001), and extubation (<i>P</i> = 0.026). The need for vasopressor and anti-cholinergic drugs was similar between groups, and no subject required naloxone administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study's findings demonstrated that generic remifentanil is non-inferior to fentanyl and equivalent to Ultiva for general anaesthesia in Indian patients undergoing various surgical and diagnostic procedures. Remifentanil offers advantages in terms of optimum haemodynamic stability, fast equilibrating analgesia, and rapid emergence from sedation, making it a suitable alternative to fentanyl.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"68 11","pages":"985-995"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_289_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Remifentanil and fentanyl are potent opioid analgesics commonly used during surgery due to their distinct pharmacological profiles. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a generic remifentanil (test drug) with fentanyl and Ultiva (innovator formulation) during general anaesthesia in the Indian population.

Methods: This phase III, multi-centre (n = 13), randomised, three-arm, comparative study was conducted from 24 November 2021 to 31 March 2022. Eligible subjects scheduled for elective therapeutic and diagnostic surgical procedures (n = 314) were randomised into generic remifentanil, Ultiva, and fentanyl groups. An independent anaesthetist blinded to treatment allocation assessed efficacy and safety parameters. The primary efficacy endpoint was haemodynamic response during specific activities (endotracheal intubation, skin incision, skin closure, and extubation).

Results: The study groups exhibited no significant differences in demographic and baseline characteristics. Heart rate was similar between the remifentanil and Ultiva groups measured during laryngeal intubation, skin incision, skin closure, and extubation (P > 0.05 in all four procedures). Heart rate was significantly higher in the fentanyl group in comparison to the remifentanil group during laryngeal intubation (P = 0.035), skin incision (P = 0.017), skin closure (P = 0.001), and extubation (P = 0.026). The need for vasopressor and anti-cholinergic drugs was similar between groups, and no subject required naloxone administration.

Conclusion: Our study's findings demonstrated that generic remifentanil is non-inferior to fentanyl and equivalent to Ultiva for general anaesthesia in Indian patients undergoing various surgical and diagnostic procedures. Remifentanil offers advantages in terms of optimum haemodynamic stability, fast equilibrating analgesia, and rapid emergence from sedation, making it a suitable alternative to fentanyl.

通用瑞芬太尼制剂与芬太尼和Ultiva在全身麻醉期间的疗效和安全性:一项III期、前瞻性、多中心、观察者盲、随机对照试验
背景和目的:瑞芬太尼和芬太尼是有效的阿片类镇痛药,常用于手术中,由于其独特的药理特征。本研究旨在比较非专利瑞芬太尼(试验药物)与芬太尼和Ultiva(创新配方)在印度人群全身麻醉期间的疗效和安全性。方法:该III期多中心(n = 13)、随机、三组比较研究于2021年11月24日至2022年3月31日进行。计划进行选择性治疗性和诊断性外科手术的符合条件的受试者(n = 314)被随机分为非专利瑞芬太尼组、乌蒂瓦组和芬太尼组。一名独立麻醉师对治疗分配不知情,评估了疗效和安全性参数。主要疗效终点是特定活动(气管插管、皮肤切开、皮肤闭合和拔管)期间的血流动力学反应。结果:研究组在人口统计学和基线特征上没有显著差异。瑞芬太尼组和乌蒂瓦组在喉插管、皮肤切开、皮肤闭合和拔管期间的心率相似(所有四种手术的P < 0.05)。芬太尼组在喉插管(P = 0.035)、皮肤切开(P = 0.017)、皮肤闭合(P = 0.001)和拔管(P = 0.026)时心率显著高于瑞芬太尼组。两组间对血管加压药和抗胆碱能药物的需求相似,没有受试者需要纳洛酮。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在接受各种手术和诊断程序的印度患者中,通用瑞芬太尼的全麻效果不逊于芬太尼,相当于乌蒂瓦。瑞芬太尼在最佳血流动力学稳定性、快速平衡镇痛和镇静快速恢复方面具有优势,是芬太尼的合适替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信