Comparison of target concentration of propofol during three phases of live donor liver transplant surgery using a target-controlled infusion of propofol total intravenous anaesthesia - A prospective, observational pilot study.

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-26 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_535_24
Neha Garg, Yatin Kalra, Shivali Panwar, Mahesh K Arora, Udit Dhingra
{"title":"Comparison of target concentration of propofol during three phases of live donor liver transplant surgery using a target-controlled infusion of propofol total intravenous anaesthesia - A prospective, observational pilot study.","authors":"Neha Garg, Yatin Kalra, Shivali Panwar, Mahesh K Arora, Udit Dhingra","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_535_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Three phases (dissection, anhepatic, and neohepatic) exist for propofol pharmacokinetics during liver transplantation (LT), resulting in varying cardiac output, volume of distribution, and drug metabolism. The primary objective was to compare the mean target concentration of propofol required to maintain the bispectral index (BIS) between 40 and 60 during three phases of LT by using a target-controlled infusion of total intravenous anaesthesia (TCI-TIVA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, observational study, 20 adult patients diagnosed with chronic liver disease scheduled for live-donor LT were included. After anaesthesia induction and tracheal intubation, BIS-guided propofol infusion was started using TCI-TIVA with target plasma concentration (TPC) set initially at 2.5 μg/mL in all patients using the Marsh model. The TPC was decreased or increased by 0.2 μg/mL whenever the BIS values were persistently below 40 or above 60 for 15 minutes. Data were analysed using ANOVA and repeated measure ANOVA, followed by a post-hoc test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean TPC was significantly higher during dissection [2.12 (Standard deviation (SD): 0.63 μg/mL)] as compared to anhepatic and neohepatic phases [1.29 (SD: 0.65) μg/mL and 1.35 (SD: 0.54) μg/mL], respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). A significant difference was observed between dissection and anhepatic (mean difference: -0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.98, -0.75) or dissection and neohepatic phase (mean difference: -0.77 (95% CI: -1.02, -0.53). The propofol dose was significantly higher in dissection compared to the anhepatic and neohepatic phases (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The propofol's mean TPC when using TCI-TIVA decreased in the anhepatic and neohepatic phases to 61% and 63.7% of the dissection phase, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"68 11","pages":"971-977"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_535_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Three phases (dissection, anhepatic, and neohepatic) exist for propofol pharmacokinetics during liver transplantation (LT), resulting in varying cardiac output, volume of distribution, and drug metabolism. The primary objective was to compare the mean target concentration of propofol required to maintain the bispectral index (BIS) between 40 and 60 during three phases of LT by using a target-controlled infusion of total intravenous anaesthesia (TCI-TIVA).

Methods: In this prospective, observational study, 20 adult patients diagnosed with chronic liver disease scheduled for live-donor LT were included. After anaesthesia induction and tracheal intubation, BIS-guided propofol infusion was started using TCI-TIVA with target plasma concentration (TPC) set initially at 2.5 μg/mL in all patients using the Marsh model. The TPC was decreased or increased by 0.2 μg/mL whenever the BIS values were persistently below 40 or above 60 for 15 minutes. Data were analysed using ANOVA and repeated measure ANOVA, followed by a post-hoc test.

Results: The mean TPC was significantly higher during dissection [2.12 (Standard deviation (SD): 0.63 μg/mL)] as compared to anhepatic and neohepatic phases [1.29 (SD: 0.65) μg/mL and 1.35 (SD: 0.54) μg/mL], respectively (P < 0.001). A significant difference was observed between dissection and anhepatic (mean difference: -0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.98, -0.75) or dissection and neohepatic phase (mean difference: -0.77 (95% CI: -1.02, -0.53). The propofol dose was significantly higher in dissection compared to the anhepatic and neohepatic phases (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The propofol's mean TPC when using TCI-TIVA decreased in the anhepatic and neohepatic phases to 61% and 63.7% of the dissection phase, respectively.

目标控制输注异丙酚全静脉麻醉的活体肝移植手术中三个阶段异丙酚靶浓度的比较——一项前瞻性、观察性先导研究。
背景和目的:肝移植过程中异丙酚的药代动力学存在三个阶段(剥离、无肝和新肝),导致心输出量、分布量和药物代谢发生变化。主要目的是通过目标控制的全静脉麻醉(TCI-TIVA)输注,比较在LT的三个阶段中,维持双谱指数(BIS)在40至60之间所需的异丙酚平均目标浓度。方法:在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,纳入了20名诊断为慢性肝病的成年患者,计划进行活体肝移植。所有采用Marsh模型的患者在麻醉诱导和气管插管后,采用TCI-TIVA开始在bis引导下输注异丙酚,初始目标血药浓度(TPC)设定为2.5 μg/mL。当BIS值持续低于40或高于60时,TPC降低或升高0.2 μg/mL。数据分析采用方差分析和重复测量方差分析,随后进行事后检验。结果:解剖期TPC均值[2.12(标准差:0.63)μg/mL]明显高于无肝期和新肝期TPC均值[1.29(标准差:0.65)μg/mL和1.35(标准差:0.54)μg/mL] (P < 0.001)。解剖期和无肝期(平均差值:-0.87(95%可信区间(CI): -0.98, -0.75)或解剖期和新肝期(平均差值:-0.77 (95% CI: -1.02, -0.53))有显著差异。解剖期异丙酚剂量明显高于无肝期和新肝期(P < 0.001)。结论:应用TCI-TIVA时,异丙酚在无肝期和新肝期的平均TPC分别下降至解剖期的61%和63.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信