Crocus sativus (saffron) adjunct to risperidone for negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Siamand Mazhar, Ahmad Shamabadi, Kimia Kazemzadeh, Mohammad Aidin Farahvash, Atiye Heidari Dalfard, Bita Fallahpour, Mohammad-Reza Khodaei Ardakani, Shahin Akhondzadeh
{"title":"Crocus sativus (saffron) adjunct to risperidone for negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Siamand Mazhar, Ahmad Shamabadi, Kimia Kazemzadeh, Mohammad Aidin Farahvash, Atiye Heidari Dalfard, Bita Fallahpour, Mohammad-Reza Khodaei Ardakani, Shahin Akhondzadeh","doi":"10.1097/YIC.0000000000000575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current treatments for schizophrenia encounter resistance, limited efficacy, and limiting complications, necessitating novel approaches. The effects of saffron on negative symptoms were investigated as it has shown neuroprotective and antipsychotic properties. Fifty-six clinically stable chronic schizophrenic outpatients were equally assigned to saffron 15 mg q12hr or placebo groups while continuing risperidone. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was used to assess schizophrenia-related symptoms in weeks 4 and 8. Also, the patients were assessed for the Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS) and adverse effects. The baseline characteristics of the groups were comparable (Ps > 0.05). There were significant time-treatment interaction effects on negative ( = 0.137), general psychopathology ( = 0.193), and total ( = 0.113) PANSS scores. Affirmatively, their reductions were significantly greater in the saffron group until weeks 4 (Cohen's ds = 0.922, 0.898, and 0.759, respectively) and 8 (Cohen's ds = 0.850, 1.047, and 0.705, respectively). Regarding the negative symptoms, a better 25% response rate was obtained in the saffron group until the endpoint (P = 0.003). The HDRS scores, extrapyramidal symptom rating scale scores, and side effect frequencies were comparable between the groups (Ps > 0.05). Saffron was beneficial for primary negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia in a safe and tolerable manner. It also outperformed placebo in improving general psychopathology and total symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":13698,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YIC.0000000000000575","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current treatments for schizophrenia encounter resistance, limited efficacy, and limiting complications, necessitating novel approaches. The effects of saffron on negative symptoms were investigated as it has shown neuroprotective and antipsychotic properties. Fifty-six clinically stable chronic schizophrenic outpatients were equally assigned to saffron 15 mg q12hr or placebo groups while continuing risperidone. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was used to assess schizophrenia-related symptoms in weeks 4 and 8. Also, the patients were assessed for the Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS) and adverse effects. The baseline characteristics of the groups were comparable (Ps > 0.05). There were significant time-treatment interaction effects on negative ( = 0.137), general psychopathology ( = 0.193), and total ( = 0.113) PANSS scores. Affirmatively, their reductions were significantly greater in the saffron group until weeks 4 (Cohen's ds = 0.922, 0.898, and 0.759, respectively) and 8 (Cohen's ds = 0.850, 1.047, and 0.705, respectively). Regarding the negative symptoms, a better 25% response rate was obtained in the saffron group until the endpoint (P = 0.003). The HDRS scores, extrapyramidal symptom rating scale scores, and side effect frequencies were comparable between the groups (Ps > 0.05). Saffron was beneficial for primary negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia in a safe and tolerable manner. It also outperformed placebo in improving general psychopathology and total symptoms.

番红花辅助利培酮治疗精神分裂症阴性症状:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
目前的精神分裂症治疗遇到了阻力、有限的疗效和有限的并发症,需要新的方法。藏红花对阴性症状的影响被调查,因为它已经显示出神经保护和抗精神病的特性。56名临床稳定的慢性精神分裂症门诊患者被平均分配到藏红花15mg q12hr组或安慰剂组,同时继续使用利培酮。采用阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)评估第4周和第8周的精神分裂症相关症状。同时,对患者进行汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS)和不良反应评估。两组的基线特征具有可比性(p < 0.05)。在PANSS阴性评分(= 0.137)、一般精神病理评分(= 0.193)和总评分(= 0.113)上存在显著的时间-治疗交互作用。可以肯定的是,直到第4周(Cohen’s ds分别= 0.922,0.898和0.759)和第8周(Cohen’s ds分别= 0.850,1.047和0.705),藏红花组的减少都显著更大。对于阴性症状,直到终点,藏红花组获得更好的25%的缓解率(P = 0.003)。两组间HDRS评分、锥体外系症状评定量表评分和不良反应发生频率具有可比性(p < 0.05)。藏红花以安全和可耐受的方式对慢性精神分裂症的原发性阴性症状有益。它在改善一般精神病理和总症状方面也优于安慰剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
23.10%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Clinical Psychopharmacology provides an essential link between research and clinical practice throughout psychopharmacology. It reports on studies in human subjects, both healthy volunteers and patients, which relate the effects of drugs on psychological processes. A major objective of the journal is to publish fully refereed papers which throw light on the ways in which the study of psychotropic drugs can increase our understanding of psychopharmacology. To this end the journal publishes results of early Phase I and II studies, as well as those of controlled clinical trials of psychotropic drugs in Phase II and IV. Other topics covered include the epidemiology of psychotropic drug prescribing and drug taking, the sociology of psychotropic drugs including compliance, and research into the safety and adverse effects of these compounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信