Low-risk individuals with primary biliary cholangitis and significant liver stiffness: prognosis and treatment.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Dawei Ding, Yinan Hu, Gui Jia, Boling Wang, Linhua Zheng, Juan Deng, Ruiqing Sun, Xiufang Wang, Guanya Guo, Lina Cui, Yulong Shang, Ying Han
{"title":"Low-risk individuals with primary biliary cholangitis and significant liver stiffness: prognosis and treatment.","authors":"Dawei Ding, Yinan Hu, Gui Jia, Boling Wang, Linhua Zheng, Juan Deng, Ruiqing Sun, Xiufang Wang, Guanya Guo, Lina Cui, Yulong Shang, Ying Han","doi":"10.1007/s12072-024-10743-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) or combined fenofibrate had well-controlled biochemical parameters but high liver stiffness, and the prognosis as well as therapeutic options for these patients may be an area worthy of further exploration.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the prognosis and treatment of patients with low-risk and high liver stiffness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study included 424 cases of UDCA monotherapy and 102 cases of combined fenofibrate treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combination of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and the GLOBE score improved prognostic prediction for patients with UDCA monotherapy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] of 0.868 (0.811-0.925) for the fitted model and 0.834 (0.767-0.900) for the GLOBE score, p = 0.006). Further analyses revealed that LSM had an additive prognostic effect mainly in low-risk patients defined by GLOBE < 0.5 (AUC, 0.777 [0.724-0.825] vs 0.642 [0.583-0.699], p = 0.001). For patients in the low-risk group, the prognosis was worse when LSM > 11 kPa (7/53 [13%] vs 2/227 [1%], p = 0.001). The prognosis was consistent between patients in the \"low-risk and LSM > 11 kPa\" group and the medium-risk group defined by 0.5 < GLOBE < 1.8 (7/53 [13%] vs 22/121 [18%], p = 0.418). In low-risk patients treated with combined fenofibrate therapy, the prognosis was worse when LSM > 11 kPa (3/21 [14%] vs 0/47 [0%], p = 0.022). The prognosis was consistent between patients in the \"low-risk and LSM > 11 kPa\" and the medium-risk groups (3/21 [14%] vs 6/27 [22%], p = 0.353). Antifibrotic drugs failed to reduce the incidence of the primary outcome (5/45 [11%] vs 5/27 [19%], p = 0.598), and delayed the progression of LSM in patients with low-risk and LSM > 11 kPa at 36 months of follow-up (changes in LSM, - 3.31 [- 5.04 to - 1.52] vs - 1.74 [- 2.83 to 1.5], p = 0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with GLOBE-defined low-risk and LSM > 11 kPa had a poor prognosis, and antifibrotic therapy may slow the progression of liver stiffness in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12901,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-024-10743-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Some patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) or combined fenofibrate had well-controlled biochemical parameters but high liver stiffness, and the prognosis as well as therapeutic options for these patients may be an area worthy of further exploration.

Aims: To explore the prognosis and treatment of patients with low-risk and high liver stiffness.

Methods: A retrospective study included 424 cases of UDCA monotherapy and 102 cases of combined fenofibrate treatment.

Results: The combination of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and the GLOBE score improved prognostic prediction for patients with UDCA monotherapy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] of 0.868 (0.811-0.925) for the fitted model and 0.834 (0.767-0.900) for the GLOBE score, p = 0.006). Further analyses revealed that LSM had an additive prognostic effect mainly in low-risk patients defined by GLOBE < 0.5 (AUC, 0.777 [0.724-0.825] vs 0.642 [0.583-0.699], p = 0.001). For patients in the low-risk group, the prognosis was worse when LSM > 11 kPa (7/53 [13%] vs 2/227 [1%], p = 0.001). The prognosis was consistent between patients in the "low-risk and LSM > 11 kPa" group and the medium-risk group defined by 0.5 < GLOBE < 1.8 (7/53 [13%] vs 22/121 [18%], p = 0.418). In low-risk patients treated with combined fenofibrate therapy, the prognosis was worse when LSM > 11 kPa (3/21 [14%] vs 0/47 [0%], p = 0.022). The prognosis was consistent between patients in the "low-risk and LSM > 11 kPa" and the medium-risk groups (3/21 [14%] vs 6/27 [22%], p = 0.353). Antifibrotic drugs failed to reduce the incidence of the primary outcome (5/45 [11%] vs 5/27 [19%], p = 0.598), and delayed the progression of LSM in patients with low-risk and LSM > 11 kPa at 36 months of follow-up (changes in LSM, - 3.31 [- 5.04 to - 1.52] vs - 1.74 [- 2.83 to 1.5], p = 0.046).

Conclusions: Patients with GLOBE-defined low-risk and LSM > 11 kPa had a poor prognosis, and antifibrotic therapy may slow the progression of liver stiffness in these patients.

原发性胆管炎和肝脏僵硬的低危个体:预后和治疗。
背景:部分接受熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)或联合非诺贝特治疗的患者生化参数控制良好,但肝脏硬度较高,这些患者的预后和治疗选择可能是一个值得进一步探索的领域。目的:探讨低危高肝硬化患者的预后及治疗。方法:对424例UDCA单药治疗和102例非诺贝特联合治疗进行回顾性研究。结果:肝硬度测量(LSM)和GLOBE评分联合改善了UDCA单药治疗患者的预后预测(拟合模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积[AUC]为0.868 (0.811-0.925),GLOBE评分为0.834 (0.767-0.900),p = 0.006)。进一步分析显示,LSM主要对GLOBE 11 kPa定义的低风险患者具有累加性预后影响(7/53 [13%]vs 2/227 [1%], p = 0.001)。“低危LSM > 11kpa”组与以0.5 11kpa为标准的中危组预后一致(3/21 [14%]vs 0/47 [0%], p = 0.022)。“低危及LSM > 11kpa”组与中危组患者预后一致(3/21 [14%]vs 6/27 [22%], p = 0.353)。抗纤维化药物未能降低主要结局的发生率(5/45 [11%]vs 5/27 [19%], p = 0.598),并且在随访36个月时,低风险和LSM bbb11 kPa患者LSM的进展延迟(LSM的变化,- 3.31[- 5.04至- 1.52]vs - 1.74[- 2.83至- 1.5],p = 0.046)。结论:globe定义的低危和LSM患者bbb11 kPa预后较差,抗纤维化治疗可能减缓这些患者肝脏僵硬的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepatology International
Hepatology International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology International is the official journal of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). This is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal will focus mainly on new and emerging technologies, cutting-edge science and advances in liver and biliary disorders. Types of articles published: -Original Research Articles related to clinical care and basic research -Review Articles -Consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment -Clinical cases, images -Selected Author Summaries -Video Submissions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信