Risk Factors for de Novo Postoperative Urinary Retention in Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1177/21925682241308508
Hideaki Nakajima, Kazuya Honjoh, Shuji Watanabe, Naoto Takeura, Arisa Kubota, Akihiko Matsumine
{"title":"Risk Factors for de Novo Postoperative Urinary Retention in Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery.","authors":"Hideaki Nakajima, Kazuya Honjoh, Shuji Watanabe, Naoto Takeura, Arisa Kubota, Akihiko Matsumine","doi":"10.1177/21925682241308508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveDe novo postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after lumbar posterior decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is a statistically known but uncommon complication for both patients and spine surgeons. The aim of this study is to review clinical data and imaging findings and identify preoperative predictors of de novo POUR.MethodsThe subjects were 738 surgically treated patients with LSCS, without preoperative bladder dysfunction or perioperative complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses using propensity score matching were performed to identify prognostic factors for POUR lasting for at least 1 week after postoperative urinary catheter removal.ResultsPOUR occurred in 23 patients (3.1%). The median recovery time was 41 days and only 12 patients (52.2%) showed improvement within 3 months. Patients with POUR were significantly older, and the lumbar Cobb angle, location of compressed dura mater (ventral or dorsal), and type of cauda equina redundancy (curve-type) were identified as independent prognostic factors. POUR had no association with sex, comorbidities, surgical procedures, number of decompressed segments, or degree of dura mater compression.ConclusionsThis study suggests that older age and curve-type stenosis with ventral or dorsal compression of the dura mater are risk factors for development of de novo POUR. Such preoperative imaging findings may indicate a higher risk of intraoperative thermal and nerve injuries, and possible uneven cauda equina flow improvement after decompression.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2669-2678"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241308508","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveDe novo postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after lumbar posterior decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is a statistically known but uncommon complication for both patients and spine surgeons. The aim of this study is to review clinical data and imaging findings and identify preoperative predictors of de novo POUR.MethodsThe subjects were 738 surgically treated patients with LSCS, without preoperative bladder dysfunction or perioperative complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses using propensity score matching were performed to identify prognostic factors for POUR lasting for at least 1 week after postoperative urinary catheter removal.ResultsPOUR occurred in 23 patients (3.1%). The median recovery time was 41 days and only 12 patients (52.2%) showed improvement within 3 months. Patients with POUR were significantly older, and the lumbar Cobb angle, location of compressed dura mater (ventral or dorsal), and type of cauda equina redundancy (curve-type) were identified as independent prognostic factors. POUR had no association with sex, comorbidities, surgical procedures, number of decompressed segments, or degree of dura mater compression.ConclusionsThis study suggests that older age and curve-type stenosis with ventral or dorsal compression of the dura mater are risk factors for development of de novo POUR. Such preoperative imaging findings may indicate a higher risk of intraoperative thermal and nerve injuries, and possible uneven cauda equina flow improvement after decompression.

后路腰椎术后尿潴留的危险因素。
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:腰椎后路减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄(LSCS)后发生的术后尿潴留(POUR)是一种统计学上已知但对患者和脊柱外科医生来说都不常见的并发症。本研究的目的是回顾临床资料和影像学表现,并确定新发POUR的术前预测因素。方法:选取738例术前无膀胱功能障碍、围手术期无并发症的LSCS患者。采用倾向评分匹配进行单因素和多因素分析,以确定尿潴留术后持续至少1周的预后因素。结果:23例(3.1%)患者发生POUR。中位恢复时间为41天,仅有12例(52.2%)患者在3个月内好转。POUR患者明显年龄较大,腰椎Cobb角、硬脑膜受压位置(腹侧或背侧)和马尾冗余类型(曲线型)被认为是独立的预后因素。POUR与性别、合并症、手术方式、减压节段数量或硬脑膜受压程度无关。结论:本研究提示,年龄较大和曲线型狭窄伴硬脑膜腹侧或背侧压迫是发生新发POUR的危险因素。这样的术前影像学表现可能提示术中热损伤和神经损伤的风险较高,减压后马尾血流改善可能不均匀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信