Nonopioid medications for managing opioid withdrawal in acute care settings: A scoping review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Brian L Erstad, Aurora N Quaye, Megan E Hellwege, David Do, Brian J Kopp
{"title":"Nonopioid medications for managing opioid withdrawal in acute care settings: A scoping review.","authors":"Brian L Erstad, Aurora N Quaye, Megan E Hellwege, David Do, Brian J Kopp","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxae371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There are hospitalized patients with chronic opioid use who will experience signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal who were not on medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) prior to admission, do not want to start or are unable to start medications for OUD during admission, and want to limit or avoid the use of opioids. The purpose of this scoping review was to assess the potential effectiveness and safety of using non-opioid agents for managing acute opioid withdrawal in acute care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed (inception to 2024), Embase (inception to 2024), and Cochrane Library (inception to 2024) were the databases evaluated for the literature search. Bibliographies of full-text articles were reviewed for additional relevant papers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies evaluating nonopioid agents for managing acute opioid withdrawal were identified in the literature search. The agents could be divided into 4 broad mechanistic categories: α-adrenergic receptor agonists, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) modulators, and serotonergic agents. Of these drug classes, the available literature suggests the α-adrenergic receptor agonists clonidine and lofexidine have the best evidence of efficacy as alternative agents for acute opioid withdrawal, although the majority of studies comparing such agents to opioids for opioid withdrawal were conducted well before the rise in synthetic opioid overdose deaths and have other methodologic issues that limit firm conclusions concerning efficacy and, particularly, safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the nonopioid alternative agents that have been studied for acute opioid withdrawal, there is more evidence supporting the efficacy of α-adrenergic receptor agonists as opposed to NMDA antagonists, GABA modulators, or sertonergic agents; however, more research is needed regarding the efficacy and safety of nonopioid alternatives for acute opioid withdrawal in order to better guide clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"898-905"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There are hospitalized patients with chronic opioid use who will experience signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal who were not on medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) prior to admission, do not want to start or are unable to start medications for OUD during admission, and want to limit or avoid the use of opioids. The purpose of this scoping review was to assess the potential effectiveness and safety of using non-opioid agents for managing acute opioid withdrawal in acute care settings.

Methods: PubMed (inception to 2024), Embase (inception to 2024), and Cochrane Library (inception to 2024) were the databases evaluated for the literature search. Bibliographies of full-text articles were reviewed for additional relevant papers.

Results: Twenty-eight studies evaluating nonopioid agents for managing acute opioid withdrawal were identified in the literature search. The agents could be divided into 4 broad mechanistic categories: α-adrenergic receptor agonists, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) modulators, and serotonergic agents. Of these drug classes, the available literature suggests the α-adrenergic receptor agonists clonidine and lofexidine have the best evidence of efficacy as alternative agents for acute opioid withdrawal, although the majority of studies comparing such agents to opioids for opioid withdrawal were conducted well before the rise in synthetic opioid overdose deaths and have other methodologic issues that limit firm conclusions concerning efficacy and, particularly, safety.

Conclusion: For the nonopioid alternative agents that have been studied for acute opioid withdrawal, there is more evidence supporting the efficacy of α-adrenergic receptor agonists as opposed to NMDA antagonists, GABA modulators, or sertonergic agents; however, more research is needed regarding the efficacy and safety of nonopioid alternatives for acute opioid withdrawal in order to better guide clinical decision-making.

非阿片类药物治疗阿片类药物戒断在急性护理设置:范围审查。
目的:有慢性阿片类药物使用的住院患者,入院前未服用阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)药物,不希望开始或无法开始使用OUD药物,并希望限制或避免使用阿片类药物,但会出现阿片类药物戒断体征和症状。本综述的目的是评估在急性护理环境中使用非阿片类药物治疗急性阿片类药物戒断的潜在有效性和安全性。方法:采用PubMed(成立至2024年)、Embase(成立至2024年)和Cochrane Library(成立至2024年)数据库进行文献检索。对全文文章的参考书目进行了审查,以寻找其他相关论文。结果:在文献检索中确定了28项评估非阿片类药物治疗急性阿片类药物戒断的研究。这些药物可分为4大类:α-肾上腺素能受体激动剂、n -甲基-d-天冬氨酸(NMDA)拮抗剂、γ -氨基丁酸(GABA)调节剂和5 -羟色胺能剂。在这些药物类别中,现有文献表明α-肾上腺素受体激动剂可定和洛非昔定作为阿片类药物急性戒断的替代药物具有最佳疗效证据,尽管大多数比较此类药物和阿片类药物用于阿片类药物戒断的研究是在合成阿片类药物过量死亡上升之前进行的,并且存在其他方法学问题,限制了关于有效性,特别是安全性的确切结论。结论:对于急性阿片类戒断的非阿片类替代药物,有更多的证据支持α-肾上腺素能受体激动剂的疗效,而不是NMDA拮抗剂、GABA调节剂或血清素能药物;然而,非阿片类药物替代急性阿片类药物戒断的有效性和安全性需要更多的研究,以便更好地指导临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信