External validation of the sICOP score for early mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mitsuaki Nishikimi, Kei Hayashida, Takashi Tagami, Shinichiro Ohshimo, Nobuaki Shime, Kazuma Yamakawa
{"title":"External validation of the sICOP score for early mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19","authors":"Mitsuaki Nishikimi,&nbsp;Kei Hayashida,&nbsp;Takashi Tagami,&nbsp;Shinichiro Ohshimo,&nbsp;Nobuaki Shime,&nbsp;Kazuma Yamakawa","doi":"10.1002/ams2.978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to externally validate the prognostic score for mechanically ventilated patients with novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), the simplified intubated COVID-19 predictive (sICOP) score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study conducted using the database registry of patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 at 66 hospitals in Japan. The data of 146 mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients were analyzed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The areas under the curve (AUC) of the sICOP score for predicting the 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were 0.81 (0.73–0.89) and 0.74 (0.65–0.83), respectively. The AUC of the score was statistically significantly higher than that of the SOFA score for 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality (28-day mortality; 0.82 [0.73–0.90] vs. 0.58 [0.46–0.70], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, in-hospital mortality; 0.75 [0.66–0.84] vs 0.55 [0.44–0.66], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We found that the sICOP score was useful for predicting the 28-day mortality with excellent accuracy in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in the era prior to the widespread availability of vaccines and effective antivirals. Validation of the score would be needed by using data from recent waves.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives

The aim of this study was to externally validate the prognostic score for mechanically ventilated patients with novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), the simplified intubated COVID-19 predictive (sICOP) score.

Methods

This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study conducted using the database registry of patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 at 66 hospitals in Japan. The data of 146 mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients were analyzed.

Results

The areas under the curve (AUC) of the sICOP score for predicting the 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were 0.81 (0.73–0.89) and 0.74 (0.65–0.83), respectively. The AUC of the score was statistically significantly higher than that of the SOFA score for 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality (28-day mortality; 0.82 [0.73–0.90] vs. 0.58 [0.46–0.70], p < 0.001, in-hospital mortality; 0.75 [0.66–0.84] vs 0.55 [0.44–0.66], p < 0.001).

Conclusion

We found that the sICOP score was useful for predicting the 28-day mortality with excellent accuracy in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in the era prior to the widespread availability of vaccines and effective antivirals. Validation of the score would be needed by using data from recent waves.

Abstract Image

COVID-19机械通气患者早期死亡率sICOP评分的外部验证
背景与目的:本研究的目的是外部验证机械通气的新型冠状病毒病-2019 (COVID-19)患者预后评分,即简化的插管COVID-19预测(sICOP)评分。方法:这是一项回顾性、多中心、观察性研究,使用日本66家医院的中重度COVID-19患者数据库登记。对146例机械通气COVID-19患者的资料进行分析。结果:sICOP评分预测28天死亡率和住院死亡率的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.81(0.73 ~ 0.89)和0.74(0.65 ~ 0.83)。该评分的AUC在28天死亡率和住院死亡率方面均显著高于SOFA评分(28天死亡率;结论:我们发现在疫苗和有效抗病毒药物广泛使用之前,sICOP评分可用于预测机械通气的COVID-19患者28天死亡率,准确性很高。需要使用最近几波的数据来验证分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Acute Medicine & Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信