Breakthrough cancer pain management: mixed-methods study of health care professionals.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Gregory Brian Crawford, Ali Lakhani, L Palmer, Menka Sebalj, P Rolan
{"title":"Breakthrough cancer pain management: mixed-methods study of health care professionals.","authors":"Gregory Brian Crawford, Ali Lakhani, L Palmer, Menka Sebalj, P Rolan","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-004951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Knowledge gaps in defining, diagnosing, educating health practitioners and treatment options hinder breakthrough cancer pain (BtCP) management. A systematic review revealed a lack of clarity on health professional derived definitions, management strategies and professional development for BtCP. The current study aimed to explore the perspectives of multidisciplinary health professionals by seeking to understand how they define, identify, treat and manage BtCP, barriers to management and professional development requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods approach involving a two-phase data collection process was employed. Health professionals initially completed an online survey capturing perspectives on BtCP, management strategies, barriers and education/professional development requirements. Survey participants expressing interest were then invited to complete a semistructured interview for an in-depth exploration of their perspectives. Descriptive statistics and frequencies summarised online survey data. Open-ended responses were themed, and categories created. Semistructured interview transcripts were inductively analysed for recurring or divergent themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four participants completed the online survey and 11 of them participated in an interview. Findings confirmed the importance of patient communication and education in managing BtCP, emphasising the need for adequate resources and training. Interdisciplinary relationships were highlighted as important and contributing to effective BtCP management, supporting professional growth and confidence in prescribing pain management medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study filled research gaps by involving diverse health professionals to explore BtCP identification, treatment, barriers and professional development need. Future research should emphasise interdisciplinary collaboration, invest in targeted resources, training and culturally appropriate communication to address barriers in patient interaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"349-358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-004951","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Knowledge gaps in defining, diagnosing, educating health practitioners and treatment options hinder breakthrough cancer pain (BtCP) management. A systematic review revealed a lack of clarity on health professional derived definitions, management strategies and professional development for BtCP. The current study aimed to explore the perspectives of multidisciplinary health professionals by seeking to understand how they define, identify, treat and manage BtCP, barriers to management and professional development requirements.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach involving a two-phase data collection process was employed. Health professionals initially completed an online survey capturing perspectives on BtCP, management strategies, barriers and education/professional development requirements. Survey participants expressing interest were then invited to complete a semistructured interview for an in-depth exploration of their perspectives. Descriptive statistics and frequencies summarised online survey data. Open-ended responses were themed, and categories created. Semistructured interview transcripts were inductively analysed for recurring or divergent themes.

Results: Fifty-four participants completed the online survey and 11 of them participated in an interview. Findings confirmed the importance of patient communication and education in managing BtCP, emphasising the need for adequate resources and training. Interdisciplinary relationships were highlighted as important and contributing to effective BtCP management, supporting professional growth and confidence in prescribing pain management medication.

Conclusions: The study filled research gaps by involving diverse health professionals to explore BtCP identification, treatment, barriers and professional development need. Future research should emphasise interdisciplinary collaboration, invest in targeted resources, training and culturally appropriate communication to address barriers in patient interaction.

突破性癌症疼痛管理:卫生保健专业人员的混合方法研究。
目的:在定义、诊断、教育卫生从业人员和治疗方案方面的知识差距阻碍了突破性癌症疼痛(BtCP)管理。一项系统综述显示,BtCP在卫生专业衍生定义、管理策略和专业发展方面缺乏清晰度。本研究旨在探讨多学科卫生专业人员的观点,试图了解他们如何定义、识别、治疗和管理BtCP、管理障碍和专业发展要求。方法:采用混合方法,包括两阶段的数据收集过程。卫生专业人员最初完成了一项在线调查,收集了对BtCP、管理战略、障碍和教育/专业发展要求的看法。表示感兴趣的调查参与者随后被邀请完成半结构化访谈,以深入探讨他们的观点。描述性统计和频率汇总在线调查数据。开放式的回答是主题的,并创建了类别。对半结构化访谈记录进行了归纳分析,以确定重复或不同的主题。结果:54位参与者完成了在线调查,11位参与者参加了访谈。研究结果证实了患者沟通和教育在管理BtCP中的重要性,强调需要足够的资源和培训。跨学科关系被强调为重要的,有助于有效的BtCP管理,支持专业成长和处方疼痛管理药物的信心。结论:本研究涉及不同的卫生专业人员,探讨BtCP的识别、治疗、障碍和专业发展需求,填补了研究空白。未来的研究应强调跨学科合作,投资于有针对性的资源,培训和文化上适当的沟通,以解决患者互动中的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信