Development of a model predicting falls in older emergency department patients using smartphone-based mobility measures.

Brian Suffoletto, David Kim, Caitlin Toth, Waverly Mayer, Nick Ashenburg, Michelle Lin, Michael Losak
{"title":"Development of a model predicting falls in older emergency department patients using smartphone-based mobility measures.","authors":"Brian Suffoletto, David Kim, Caitlin Toth, Waverly Mayer, Nick Ashenburg, Michelle Lin, Michael Losak","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While emergency departments (EDs) are crucial for identifying patients at risk for falls, existing fall risk measures are often inaccurate. This study aimed to assess whether iPhone sensor-based mobility measures collected after ED discharge can improve fall prediction compared with traditional ED-based screening measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, observational cohort study recruited ED patients aged 60 or older who owned an iPhone. Participants completed baseline assessments, downloaded a custom app to track mobility measures from the iPhone, and were followed for 90 days post-discharge. Fall outcomes were self-reported via the app or follow-up phone calls. Logistic regression and the LASSO technique were employed to identify significant predictors. The discriminative ability of the models was assessed by comparing the C-statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 149 participants enrolled, 76.5% (N = 114) provided at least 7 days of post-discharge iPhone sensor-based mobility data. The cohort had a mean age of 73 years, with 16.7% (N = 19) experiencing a fall. Participants who fell showed a significantly greater increase in daily steps over time compared with those who did not (p = 0.002). The extended logistic regression model, by incorporating mean gait asymmetry and change in step count, demonstrated a higher but nonsignificant improvement in discriminative ability (C-statistic = 0.84) compared with the base model (C-statistic = 0.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that iPhone mobility measures collected after ED discharge can enhance fall prediction relative to self-reported fall risk screening questions in older adults. The strongest mobility predictors were gait asymmetry and changes in step count. While the findings suggest that post-discharge mobility monitoring could improve fall prevention strategies, further validation in diverse populations is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: While emergency departments (EDs) are crucial for identifying patients at risk for falls, existing fall risk measures are often inaccurate. This study aimed to assess whether iPhone sensor-based mobility measures collected after ED discharge can improve fall prediction compared with traditional ED-based screening measures.

Methods: This single-center, observational cohort study recruited ED patients aged 60 or older who owned an iPhone. Participants completed baseline assessments, downloaded a custom app to track mobility measures from the iPhone, and were followed for 90 days post-discharge. Fall outcomes were self-reported via the app or follow-up phone calls. Logistic regression and the LASSO technique were employed to identify significant predictors. The discriminative ability of the models was assessed by comparing the C-statistics.

Results: Of the 149 participants enrolled, 76.5% (N = 114) provided at least 7 days of post-discharge iPhone sensor-based mobility data. The cohort had a mean age of 73 years, with 16.7% (N = 19) experiencing a fall. Participants who fell showed a significantly greater increase in daily steps over time compared with those who did not (p = 0.002). The extended logistic regression model, by incorporating mean gait asymmetry and change in step count, demonstrated a higher but nonsignificant improvement in discriminative ability (C-statistic = 0.84) compared with the base model (C-statistic = 0.79).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that iPhone mobility measures collected after ED discharge can enhance fall prediction relative to self-reported fall risk screening questions in older adults. The strongest mobility predictors were gait asymmetry and changes in step count. While the findings suggest that post-discharge mobility monitoring could improve fall prevention strategies, further validation in diverse populations is necessary.

开发一种模型,使用基于智能手机的移动测量来预测急诊科老年患者的跌倒。
目的:虽然急诊科(EDs)对识别有跌倒风险的患者至关重要,但现有的跌倒风险措施往往不准确。本研究旨在评估与传统ED筛查措施相比,ED放电后基于iPhone传感器的移动能力测量是否能改善跌倒预测。方法:这项单中心、观察性队列研究招募了年龄在60岁或以上、拥有iPhone的ED患者。参与者完成了基线评估,下载了一款自定义应用程序,从iPhone上跟踪活动指标,并在出院后接受了90天的随访。跌倒结果是通过应用程序或后续电话自我报告的。采用逻辑回归和LASSO技术来确定显著的预测因子。通过比较c统计量来评估模型的判别能力。结果:在纳入的149名参与者中,76.5% (N = 114)提供了出院后至少7天的基于iPhone传感器的活动数据。该队列的平均年龄为73岁,其中16.7% (N = 19)经历过跌倒。随着时间的推移,跌倒的参与者与没有跌倒的参与者相比,每天的步数明显增加(p = 0.002)。与基本模型(C-statistic = 0.79)相比,纳入平均步态不对称和步数变化的扩展逻辑回归模型(C-statistic = 0.84)显示出更高但不显著的判别能力改善(C-statistic = 0.84)。结论:本研究表明,相对于老年人自我报告的跌倒风险筛查问题,在急诊科出院后收集的iPhone移动能力测量可以增强跌倒预测。最强的活动预测因子是步态不对称和步数变化。虽然研究结果表明,出院后活动监测可以改善预防跌倒的策略,但需要在不同人群中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信