Effects of Preparation Technique on Periosteal Microcirculation After Autologous Bone Augmentation in an Animal Model.

Vasilios Alevizakos, Aileen Friederichs, Björn Rahlf, Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Philipp Jehn, Marcus Schiller
{"title":"Effects of Preparation Technique on Periosteal Microcirculation After Autologous Bone Augmentation in an Animal Model.","authors":"Vasilios Alevizakos, Aileen Friederichs, Björn Rahlf, Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Philipp Jehn, Marcus Schiller","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This controlled in vivo experimental study examines the impact of 2 periosteum preparation techniques on microcirculation during bone augmentation with isogenic bone grafts in rats. Twenty female Lewis rats were divided into 2 groups (n = 10 each). In one group, the periosteum was prepared with a conventional periosteal elevator; in the other, a piezoelectric device was used. After graft implantation at calvarial sites, intravital microscopy was performed postoperation (day 0) and on days 3, 8, and 28 immediately to assess microvascular parameters: functional capillary density, blood flow velocity, and vessel diameter. Statistical analysis was conducted using analysis of variance on ranks with P < .05. The piezoelectric device group showed higher mean values for functional capillary density, blood flow velocity, and vessel diameter than the conventional instrument group, though differences were not statistically significant. This study suggests that periosteum preparation with a piezoelectric device does not significantly differ from conventional methods regarding microcirculatory outcomes. Either method appears viable for preserving microcirculatory integrity during bone augmentation. Further research in larger models and clinical contexts is recommended to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":519890,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of oral implantology","volume":" ","pages":"14-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of oral implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This controlled in vivo experimental study examines the impact of 2 periosteum preparation techniques on microcirculation during bone augmentation with isogenic bone grafts in rats. Twenty female Lewis rats were divided into 2 groups (n = 10 each). In one group, the periosteum was prepared with a conventional periosteal elevator; in the other, a piezoelectric device was used. After graft implantation at calvarial sites, intravital microscopy was performed postoperation (day 0) and on days 3, 8, and 28 immediately to assess microvascular parameters: functional capillary density, blood flow velocity, and vessel diameter. Statistical analysis was conducted using analysis of variance on ranks with P < .05. The piezoelectric device group showed higher mean values for functional capillary density, blood flow velocity, and vessel diameter than the conventional instrument group, though differences were not statistically significant. This study suggests that periosteum preparation with a piezoelectric device does not significantly differ from conventional methods regarding microcirculatory outcomes. Either method appears viable for preserving microcirculatory integrity during bone augmentation. Further research in larger models and clinical contexts is recommended to confirm these findings.

制备技术对自体骨增强动物模型骨膜微循环的影响。
试验设计:这项体内对照实验研究考察了两种骨膜制备技术对大鼠等基因骨移植物骨增强过程中微循环的影响。方法:雌性Lewis大鼠20只,随机分为两组,每组10只。一组采用常规骨膜提升器制备骨膜;在另一个实验中,使用了压电装置。在颅骨部位植入移植物后,术后(第0天)和第3、8和28天立即进行活体显微镜检查,以评估微血管参数:功能毛细血管密度、血流速度和血管直径。结果:压电装置组在功能毛细血管密度、血流速度、血管直径等指标的平均值均高于常规器械组,但差异无统计学意义。结论:本研究表明,在微循环结果方面,使用压电装置制备骨膜与传统方法没有显著差异。这两种方法似乎都可以在骨增强过程中保持微循环的完整性。建议在更大的模型和临床背景下进一步研究以证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信