Investigating LETd optimization strategies in carbon ion radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: a dosimetric study using an anthropomorphic phantom

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1002/mp.17569
Filipa Baltazar, Friderike K. Longarino, Christina Stengl, Jakob Liermann, Stewart Mein, Jürgen Debus, Thomas Tessonnier, Andrea Mairani
{"title":"Investigating LETd optimization strategies in carbon ion radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: a dosimetric study using an anthropomorphic phantom","authors":"Filipa Baltazar,&nbsp;Friderike K. Longarino,&nbsp;Christina Stengl,&nbsp;Jakob Liermann,&nbsp;Stewart Mein,&nbsp;Jürgen Debus,&nbsp;Thomas Tessonnier,&nbsp;Andrea Mairani","doi":"10.1002/mp.17569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical carbon ion beams offer the potential to overcome hypoxia-induced radioresistance in pancreatic tumors, due to their high dose-averaged Linear Energy Transfer (LETd), as previous studies have linked a minimum LETd within the tumor to improved local control. Current clinical practices at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), which use two posterior beams, do not fully exploit the LETd advantage of carbon ions, as the high LETd is primarily focused on the beams’ distal edges. Different LETd-boosting strategies, such as Spot-scanning Hadron Arc (SHArc), could enhance LETd distribution by concentrating high-LETd values in potential hypoxic tumor cores while sparing organs at risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to investigate and verify different LETd-boosting strategies using an anthropomorphic pancreas phantom.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Various LETd-boosting strategies were investigated for a cylindrical and a pancreas-shaped target in an anthropomorphic pancreas phantom. Treatment plans were optimized using single field optimization (SFO) or multi field optimization (MFO), with objective functions based on either physical dose (Phys), relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose, or a combination of RBE and LETd-based objectives (LETopt). The LETd-boosting planning strategies were optimized with the goal of increasing the minimum LETd in the tumor without compromising its homogeneous dose coverage. Beam configurations investigated included the two-beam in-house clinical standard (2-SFO<sub>Phys</sub>, 2-SFO<sub>RBE</sub> and 2-MFO<sub>RBE-LETopt</sub>), a three-beam configuration (3-MFO<sub>RBE</sub> and 3-MFO<sub>RBE-LETopt</sub>) and SHArc (SHArc<sub>Phys</sub>, SHArc<sub>RBE</sub> and SHArc<sub>RBE-LETopt</sub>) using step-and-shoot delivery. The different plans were verified using an anthropomorphic pancreas phantom at HIT and compared to treatment planning system (TPS) predictions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All investigated LETd-boosting strategies altered the LETd distribution while meeting optimization goals and constraints, resulting in varying degrees of LETd enhancement. For the cylindrical volume, the SHArc plan resulted in the highest LETd concentration in the tumor core, with the minimum LETd in the GTV scaling up to 91 keV/µm. For the pancreas-shaped volume, however, the 3-MFO<sub>RBE-LETopt</sub> achieved a higher minimum LETd in the GTV than SHArc<sub>RBE</sub> (75.6 and 62.3 keV/µm, respectively). When combining SHArc with LETd optimization, a minimum LETd of 76.3 keV/µm was achieved, suggesting a potential benefit from this combined approach. Most dosimetric verifications showed dose deviations to the TPS within a 5% range, for both beam-per-beam and total dose. LETd-optimized and SHArc plans exhibited slightly higher mean dose deviations (2.0%—4.6%) compared to the standard RBE-based plans (&lt;1.5%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrated the feasibility of enhancing LETd in pancreatic tumors using carbon ion arc delivery coupled with LETd optimization. The possibility of delivering these plans was verified through irradiation of an anthropomorphic pancreas phantom, which showed agreement between dose measurements and predictions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 3","pages":"1746-1757"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.17569","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17569","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Clinical carbon ion beams offer the potential to overcome hypoxia-induced radioresistance in pancreatic tumors, due to their high dose-averaged Linear Energy Transfer (LETd), as previous studies have linked a minimum LETd within the tumor to improved local control. Current clinical practices at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), which use two posterior beams, do not fully exploit the LETd advantage of carbon ions, as the high LETd is primarily focused on the beams’ distal edges. Different LETd-boosting strategies, such as Spot-scanning Hadron Arc (SHArc), could enhance LETd distribution by concentrating high-LETd values in potential hypoxic tumor cores while sparing organs at risk.

Purpose

This study aims to investigate and verify different LETd-boosting strategies using an anthropomorphic pancreas phantom.

Methods

Various LETd-boosting strategies were investigated for a cylindrical and a pancreas-shaped target in an anthropomorphic pancreas phantom. Treatment plans were optimized using single field optimization (SFO) or multi field optimization (MFO), with objective functions based on either physical dose (Phys), relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose, or a combination of RBE and LETd-based objectives (LETopt). The LETd-boosting planning strategies were optimized with the goal of increasing the minimum LETd in the tumor without compromising its homogeneous dose coverage. Beam configurations investigated included the two-beam in-house clinical standard (2-SFOPhys, 2-SFORBE and 2-MFORBE-LETopt), a three-beam configuration (3-MFORBE and 3-MFORBE-LETopt) and SHArc (SHArcPhys, SHArcRBE and SHArcRBE-LETopt) using step-and-shoot delivery. The different plans were verified using an anthropomorphic pancreas phantom at HIT and compared to treatment planning system (TPS) predictions.

Results

All investigated LETd-boosting strategies altered the LETd distribution while meeting optimization goals and constraints, resulting in varying degrees of LETd enhancement. For the cylindrical volume, the SHArc plan resulted in the highest LETd concentration in the tumor core, with the minimum LETd in the GTV scaling up to 91 keV/µm. For the pancreas-shaped volume, however, the 3-MFORBE-LETopt achieved a higher minimum LETd in the GTV than SHArcRBE (75.6 and 62.3 keV/µm, respectively). When combining SHArc with LETd optimization, a minimum LETd of 76.3 keV/µm was achieved, suggesting a potential benefit from this combined approach. Most dosimetric verifications showed dose deviations to the TPS within a 5% range, for both beam-per-beam and total dose. LETd-optimized and SHArc plans exhibited slightly higher mean dose deviations (2.0%—4.6%) compared to the standard RBE-based plans (<1.5%).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the feasibility of enhancing LETd in pancreatic tumors using carbon ion arc delivery coupled with LETd optimization. The possibility of delivering these plans was verified through irradiation of an anthropomorphic pancreas phantom, which showed agreement between dose measurements and predictions.

Abstract Image

探究胰腺癌碳离子放射治疗中的 LETd 优化策略:使用拟人模型进行剂量测定研究。
背景:临床碳离子束由于其高剂量平均线性能量传递(LETd)而具有克服胰腺肿瘤缺氧引起的放射抵抗的潜力,因为先前的研究已经将肿瘤内最小的LETd与改善局部控制联系起来。目前在海德堡离子束治疗中心(HIT)的临床实践中,使用两个后光束,并没有充分利用碳离子的LETd优势,因为高LETd主要集中在光束的远端边缘。不同的LETd增强策略,如点扫描强子弧(SHArc),可以通过将高LETd值集中在潜在的缺氧肿瘤核心而增强LETd分布,同时保留危险器官。目的:本研究旨在利用拟人化胰腺幻体研究和验证不同的促led策略。方法:对拟人胰腺幻像中圆柱形靶点和胰腺形靶点的不同letd增强策略进行了研究。采用单场优化(SFO)或多场优化(MFO)对治疗方案进行优化,目标函数基于物理剂量(Phys)、相对生物有效性(RBE)加权剂量,或基于RBE和基于let -based目标的组合(LETopt)。优化了LETd增强计划策略,目标是在不影响均匀剂量覆盖的情况下增加肿瘤中的最小LETd。研究的光束配置包括两束内部临床标准(2- sfphys, 2-SFORBE和2-MFORBE-LETopt),三束配置(3-MFORBE和3-MFORBE- letopt)和SHArc (SHArcPhys, SHArcRBE和SHArcRBE- letopt),采用步进射击递送。不同的计划在HIT使用拟人化胰腺幻影进行验证,并与治疗计划系统(TPS)预测进行比较。结果:在满足优化目标和约束条件的情况下,所有优化策略都改变了优化后的优化时间分布,导致不同程度的优化时间增强。对于圆柱形体积,SHArc方案导致肿瘤核心的最高LETd浓度,GTV中的最小LETd可达91 keV/µm。然而,对于胰腺形状的体积,3- mforbes - letopt在GTV中的最小LETd比SHArcRBE更高(分别为75.6和62.3 keV/µm)。当将SHArc与LETd优化相结合时,最小LETd达到76.3 keV/µm,这表明这种组合方法具有潜在的优势。大多数剂量学验证表明,每束剂量和总剂量与TPS的剂量偏差在5%范围内。与基于rbe的标准方案相比,LETd优化方案和SHArc方案的平均剂量偏差略高(2.0%-4.6%)。结论:本研究证明了碳离子弧输送结合LETd优化方案增强胰腺肿瘤LETd的可行性。通过对拟人化胰腺幻影的照射验证了这些计划的可能性,这表明剂量测量和预测之间的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信