The Safety and Efficacy of Balance Training on Stroke Patients With Reduced Balance Ability: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Brain & NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-22 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.12786/bn.2024.17.e15
Yong Wook Kim, Seo Yeon Yoon
{"title":"The Safety and Efficacy of Balance Training on Stroke Patients With Reduced Balance Ability: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Yong Wook Kim, Seo Yeon Yoon","doi":"10.12786/bn.2024.17.e15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the safety and efficacy of balance training for stroke patients with reduced balance ability by performing a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched up to February 2022. Quality assessment was performed using the using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Studies were included if: 1) patient allocation was randomized; 2) the participant was composed of stroke patients with reduced balance ability (Berg Balance Scale [BBS] ≤ 40, Timed-Up and Go ≥ 14 seconds, or Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test ≤ 17.5); and 3) intervention was additional balance training for the experimental group. Six studies including 466 patients were included in the final analysis. The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in the BBS (mean difference [MD], 8.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.65, 11.64) and Trunk Impairment Scale (MD, 4.71; 95% CI, 3.45, 5.96) after balance training relative to the comparison group. Ambulation function was significantly improved (standardized MD, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.46, 1.49) after balance training. There was one report of a femur fracture among 230 participants in the balance training group. Balance training in addition to conventional rehabilitation program in stroke patients with reduced balance ability appears to be effective and safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"17 3","pages":"e15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2024.17.e15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the safety and efficacy of balance training for stroke patients with reduced balance ability by performing a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched up to February 2022. Quality assessment was performed using the using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Studies were included if: 1) patient allocation was randomized; 2) the participant was composed of stroke patients with reduced balance ability (Berg Balance Scale [BBS] ≤ 40, Timed-Up and Go ≥ 14 seconds, or Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test ≤ 17.5); and 3) intervention was additional balance training for the experimental group. Six studies including 466 patients were included in the final analysis. The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in the BBS (mean difference [MD], 8.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.65, 11.64) and Trunk Impairment Scale (MD, 4.71; 95% CI, 3.45, 5.96) after balance training relative to the comparison group. Ambulation function was significantly improved (standardized MD, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.46, 1.49) after balance training. There was one report of a femur fracture among 230 participants in the balance training group. Balance training in addition to conventional rehabilitation program in stroke patients with reduced balance ability appears to be effective and safe.

平衡训练对平衡能力下降的中风患者的安全性和有效性:随机对照试验的元分析。
通过一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析,探讨平衡训练对平衡能力下降的脑卒中患者的安全性和有效性。检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials数据库至2022年2月。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行质量评估。纳入的研究符合以下条件:1)患者随机分配;2)参与者由平衡能力下降的脑卒中患者组成(Berg balance Scale [BBS]≤40,Timed-Up and Go≥14秒,或Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test≤17.5);3)干预措施为实验组额外的平衡训练。最终分析纳入6项研究,共466例患者。荟萃分析显示,BBS有显著改善(平均差异[MD], 8.14;95%置信区间[CI], 4.65, 11.64)和躯干损伤量表(MD, 4.71;95% CI, 3.45, 5.96)。行走功能显著改善(标准化MD, 0.98;95% CI, 0.46, 1.49)。在平衡训练组的230名参与者中,有一例股骨骨折的报告。对于平衡能力下降的中风患者,在常规康复方案的基础上进行平衡训练是有效和安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信