[Online survey Developments in the field of crown and bridge work: the results].

J Muris
{"title":"[Online survey Developments in the field of crown and bridge work: the results].","authors":"J Muris","doi":"10.5177/ntvt.2024.12.24104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the months prior to this special issue, an online survey was conducted. The focus was on the different views on tooth- and implant-supported fixed appliances. Unfortunately, this survey was only completed by 36 people, two-thirds of whom were men and one-third of whom were women. More than three-quarters of the people have been practicing for over 10 years. Although the number of participants is too low to draw conclusions, the results show that in the case of a solitary diastema, an implant is generally not seen as a last resort and is preferred over tooth-supported constructions. Of course, the clinical circumstances are always decisive in this. Nevertheless, the answers give rise to a more critical approach to this dilemma.</p>","PeriodicalId":74255,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde","volume":"131 12","pages":"521-524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5177/ntvt.2024.12.24104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the months prior to this special issue, an online survey was conducted. The focus was on the different views on tooth- and implant-supported fixed appliances. Unfortunately, this survey was only completed by 36 people, two-thirds of whom were men and one-third of whom were women. More than three-quarters of the people have been practicing for over 10 years. Although the number of participants is too low to draw conclusions, the results show that in the case of a solitary diastema, an implant is generally not seen as a last resort and is preferred over tooth-supported constructions. Of course, the clinical circumstances are always decisive in this. Nevertheless, the answers give rise to a more critical approach to this dilemma.

[在线调查在冠桥工作领域的发展:结果]。
在本期特刊之前的几个月里,进行了一项在线调查。重点是对牙齿和种植体支持的固定矫治器的不同看法。不幸的是,只有36人完成了这项调查,其中三分之二是男性,三分之一是女性。超过四分之三的人已经练习了10年以上。虽然参与的人数太少,无法得出结论,但结果表明,在孤立隔膜的情况下,种植体通常不被视为最后的手段,而不是牙齿支撑的结构。当然,临床情况在这方面总是决定性的。然而,这些问题的答案引发了一种更为批判的方法来解决这一困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信