The Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Arm Function and Activities of Daily Living in Post-stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Brain & NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.12786/bn.2024.17.e19
Hyoseon Choi, Hyun Jung Kim
{"title":"The Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Arm Function and Activities of Daily Living in Post-stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Hyoseon Choi, Hyun Jung Kim","doi":"10.12786/bn.2024.17.e19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) on arm function and daily living compared with conventional rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia. We searched three international electronic databases-MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library-for relevant studies. The risk of bias was evaluated using Cochrane's Risk of Bias version 1.0, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations method. A total of 34 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included herein. Specifically, 21 RCTs regarding arm motor function, 13 on upper limb motor impairment, and 12 on activities of daily living (ADL) performance were analyzed. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that CIMT was significantly more effective than conventional therapy in improving arm motor function, reducing upper limb motor impairment, and enhancing ADL performance. CIMT should be implemented and tailored to the strength of the affected upper limb to improve upper limb function and ADL performance in post-stroke patients with hemiplegia.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"17 3","pages":"e19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2024.17.e19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) on arm function and daily living compared with conventional rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia. We searched three international electronic databases-MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library-for relevant studies. The risk of bias was evaluated using Cochrane's Risk of Bias version 1.0, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations method. A total of 34 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included herein. Specifically, 21 RCTs regarding arm motor function, 13 on upper limb motor impairment, and 12 on activities of daily living (ADL) performance were analyzed. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that CIMT was significantly more effective than conventional therapy in improving arm motor function, reducing upper limb motor impairment, and enhancing ADL performance. CIMT should be implemented and tailored to the strength of the affected upper limb to improve upper limb function and ADL performance in post-stroke patients with hemiplegia.

约束诱导运动治疗对脑卒中后患者手臂功能和日常生活活动的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本荟萃分析旨在评价约束诱导运动疗法(CIMT)对脑卒中偏瘫患者手臂功能和日常生活的影响,并与常规康复进行比较。我们检索了三个国际电子数据库——medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆——以获取相关研究。偏倚风险采用Cochrane's risk of bias version 1.0进行评估,证据的确定性采用分级推荐、评估、发展和评价法进行评估。本研究共纳入34项随机对照试验(RCTs)。具体而言,我们分析了21项关于手臂运动功能的随机对照试验,13项关于上肢运动障碍的随机对照试验,12项关于日常生活活动(ADL)表现的随机对照试验。meta分析结果显示,CIMT在改善手臂运动功能、减少上肢运动损伤和提高ADL表现方面明显比常规治疗更有效。在脑卒中后偏瘫患者中,CIMT应根据患肢的力量实施并量身定制,以改善上肢功能和ADL表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信