A Literature Review on Optimal Stimulation Parameters of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Motor Recovery After Stroke.

Brain & NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-28 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.12786/bn.2024.17.e24
Soo Ho Lee, Yeun Jie Yoo
{"title":"A Literature Review on Optimal Stimulation Parameters of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Motor Recovery After Stroke.","authors":"Soo Ho Lee, Yeun Jie Yoo","doi":"10.12786/bn.2024.17.e24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory technique with potential in stroke rehabilitation by modulating cortical excitability. However, the optimal parameters, including electrode placement, current intensity, stimulation duration, and electrode size, remain poorly understood, and the interactions among these factors contribute to mixed results in motor recovery post-stroke. This review explores the various stimulation parameters and their impact on enhancing corticospinal excitability (CSE) and motor function recovery. Different electrode placement (montages), such as anodal, cathodal, and bi-hemispheric stimulation, have demonstrated varying effectiveness in restoring motor function. Bihemispheric stimulation demonstrated a larger effect size compared to other unihemispheric (anodal or cathodal) stimulation; however, its relative superiority remains inconclusive. Inter-individual anatomical variations, such as skull thickness, lesion location, and cortical atrophy, can affect tDCS outcomes, highlighting the need for personalized electrode placement guided by computational modeling based on brain imaging. Furthermore, stimulation intensity, typically 1-2 mA, exhibited nonlinear effects on CSE, contrasting with the dose-response relationships observed in earlier studies. Stimulation duration is also critical, with evidence suggesting that prolonged stimulation may reverse excitability-enhancing effects beyond a certain threshold. While smaller electrodes enhance focality, an appropriately sized electrode is necessary to effectively modulate electrical activity in the target region, with evidence suggesting a dose-response relationship between electrode size and motor recovery. Overall, the interplay among these parameters underscores the need for personalized and optimized tDCS protocols to achieve consistent motor recovery in stroke patients. Future research should focus on refining these parameters to maximize the therapeutic benefits of tDCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"17 3","pages":"e24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2024.17.e24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory technique with potential in stroke rehabilitation by modulating cortical excitability. However, the optimal parameters, including electrode placement, current intensity, stimulation duration, and electrode size, remain poorly understood, and the interactions among these factors contribute to mixed results in motor recovery post-stroke. This review explores the various stimulation parameters and their impact on enhancing corticospinal excitability (CSE) and motor function recovery. Different electrode placement (montages), such as anodal, cathodal, and bi-hemispheric stimulation, have demonstrated varying effectiveness in restoring motor function. Bihemispheric stimulation demonstrated a larger effect size compared to other unihemispheric (anodal or cathodal) stimulation; however, its relative superiority remains inconclusive. Inter-individual anatomical variations, such as skull thickness, lesion location, and cortical atrophy, can affect tDCS outcomes, highlighting the need for personalized electrode placement guided by computational modeling based on brain imaging. Furthermore, stimulation intensity, typically 1-2 mA, exhibited nonlinear effects on CSE, contrasting with the dose-response relationships observed in earlier studies. Stimulation duration is also critical, with evidence suggesting that prolonged stimulation may reverse excitability-enhancing effects beyond a certain threshold. While smaller electrodes enhance focality, an appropriately sized electrode is necessary to effectively modulate electrical activity in the target region, with evidence suggesting a dose-response relationship between electrode size and motor recovery. Overall, the interplay among these parameters underscores the need for personalized and optimized tDCS protocols to achieve consistent motor recovery in stroke patients. Future research should focus on refining these parameters to maximize the therapeutic benefits of tDCS.

经颅直流电刺激用于脑卒中后运动恢复的最佳刺激参数文献综述
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种非侵入性的神经调节技术,通过调节大脑皮层兴奋性在脑卒中康复中具有潜在的应用价值。然而,最佳参数,包括电极放置、电流强度、刺激持续时间和电极大小,仍然知之甚少,这些因素之间的相互作用导致中风后运动恢复的结果不一。本文综述了各种刺激参数及其对增强皮质脊髓兴奋性(CSE)和运动功能恢复的影响。不同的电极放置(蒙太奇),如阳极、阴极和双半球刺激,在恢复运动功能方面表现出不同的效果。与其他单脑(阳极或阴极)刺激相比,双脑刺激显示出更大的效应;然而,它的相对优势仍然没有定论。个体间的解剖学差异,如颅骨厚度、病变位置和皮质萎缩,都会影响tDCS的结果,因此需要基于脑成像的计算模型来指导个性化电极放置。此外,刺激强度(通常为1-2 mA)对CSE表现出非线性效应,这与早期研究中观察到的剂量-反应关系形成了对比。刺激的持续时间也很关键,有证据表明,长时间的刺激可能会逆转超过一定阈值的兴奋性增强效果。虽然较小的电极增强聚焦性,但适当尺寸的电极对于有效调节目标区域的电活动是必要的,有证据表明电极尺寸与运动恢复之间存在剂量-反应关系。总的来说,这些参数之间的相互作用强调了个性化和优化tDCS方案的必要性,以实现卒中患者一致的运动恢复。未来的研究应侧重于完善这些参数,以最大限度地提高tDCS的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信