Perspectives on non-emergent neonatal intensive care unit to pediatric intensive care unit care transfers in the United States.

Phillip D Cohen, Renee D Boss, David C Stockwell, Meghan Bernier, Joseph M Collaco, Sapna R Kudchadkar
{"title":"Perspectives on non-emergent neonatal intensive care unit to pediatric intensive care unit care transfers in the United States.","authors":"Phillip D Cohen, Renee D Boss, David C Stockwell, Meghan Bernier, Joseph M Collaco, Sapna R Kudchadkar","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.v13.i4.97145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a substantial population of long-stay patients who non-emergently transfer directly from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) without an interim discharge home. These infants are often medically complex and have higher mortality relative to NICU or PICU-only admissions. Given an absence of data surrounding practice patterns for non-emergent NICU to PICU transfers, we hypothesized that we would encounter a broad spectrum of current practices and a high proportion of dissatisfaction with current processes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To characterize non-emergent NICU to PICU transfer practices across the United States and query PICU providers' evaluations of their effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was drafted, piloted, and sent to one physician representative from each of 115 PICUs across the United States based on membership in the PARK-PICU research consortium and membership in the Children's Hospital Association. The survey was administered <i>via</i> internet (REDCap). Analysis was performed using STATA, primarily consisting of descriptive statistics, though logistic regressions were run examining the relationship between specific transfer steps, hospital characteristics, and effectiveness of transfer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One PICU attending from each of 81 institutions in the United States completed the survey (overall 70% response rate). Over half (52%) indicated their hospital transfers patients without using set clinical criteria, and only 33% indicated that their hospital has a standardized protocol to facilitate non-emergent transfer. Fewer than half of respondents reported that their institution's non-emergent NICU to PICU transfer practices were effective for clinicians (47%) or patient families (38%). Respondents evaluated their centers' transfers as less effective when they lacked any transfer criteria (<i>P</i> = 0.027) or set transfer protocols (<i>P</i> = 0.007). Respondents overwhelmingly agreed that having set clinical criteria and standardized protocols for non-emergent transfer were important to the patient-family experience and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most hospitals lacked any clinical criteria or protocols for non-emergent NICU to PICU transfers. More positive perceptions of transfer effectiveness were found among those with set criteria and/or transfer protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":"13 4","pages":"97145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v13.i4.97145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a substantial population of long-stay patients who non-emergently transfer directly from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) without an interim discharge home. These infants are often medically complex and have higher mortality relative to NICU or PICU-only admissions. Given an absence of data surrounding practice patterns for non-emergent NICU to PICU transfers, we hypothesized that we would encounter a broad spectrum of current practices and a high proportion of dissatisfaction with current processes.

Aim: To characterize non-emergent NICU to PICU transfer practices across the United States and query PICU providers' evaluations of their effectiveness.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was drafted, piloted, and sent to one physician representative from each of 115 PICUs across the United States based on membership in the PARK-PICU research consortium and membership in the Children's Hospital Association. The survey was administered via internet (REDCap). Analysis was performed using STATA, primarily consisting of descriptive statistics, though logistic regressions were run examining the relationship between specific transfer steps, hospital characteristics, and effectiveness of transfer.

Results: One PICU attending from each of 81 institutions in the United States completed the survey (overall 70% response rate). Over half (52%) indicated their hospital transfers patients without using set clinical criteria, and only 33% indicated that their hospital has a standardized protocol to facilitate non-emergent transfer. Fewer than half of respondents reported that their institution's non-emergent NICU to PICU transfer practices were effective for clinicians (47%) or patient families (38%). Respondents evaluated their centers' transfers as less effective when they lacked any transfer criteria (P = 0.027) or set transfer protocols (P = 0.007). Respondents overwhelmingly agreed that having set clinical criteria and standardized protocols for non-emergent transfer were important to the patient-family experience and patient safety.

Conclusion: Most hospitals lacked any clinical criteria or protocols for non-emergent NICU to PICU transfers. More positive perceptions of transfer effectiveness were found among those with set criteria and/or transfer protocols.

在美国非急诊新生儿重症监护病房到儿科重症监护病房护理转移的观点。
背景:有相当数量的长期住院患者直接从新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)转移到儿科重症监护病房(PICU),而没有临时出院回家。这些婴儿通常在医学上很复杂,与NICU或picu相比,死亡率更高。鉴于缺乏关于非紧急NICU到PICU转移的实践模式的数据,我们假设我们将遇到广泛的当前实践和对当前流程的高比例不满。目的:了解美国非紧急NICU转PICU的做法,并询问PICU提供者对其有效性的评估。方法:根据PARK-PICU研究联盟和儿童医院协会的会员资格,起草、试点并发送一份横断面调查给美国115个picu中的每一个医生代表。该调查是通过互联网进行的(REDCap)。使用STATA进行分析,主要由描述性统计组成,尽管运行了逻辑回归来检查特定转诊步骤、医院特征和转诊有效性之间的关系。结果:美国81家医院各有1名PICU就诊人员完成了调查(总体应答率为70%)。超过一半(52%)的人表示,他们的医院在转移患者时没有使用既定的临床标准,只有33%的人表示,他们的医院有标准化的协议,以促进非紧急转移。不到一半的受访者报告说,他们机构的非紧急NICU转PICU的做法对临床医生(47%)或患者家庭(38%)是有效的。当缺乏任何转移标准(P = 0.027)或设置转移协议(P = 0.007)时,受访者认为其中心的转移效率较低。绝大多数受访者同意,为非紧急转移制定临床标准和标准化协议对患者家庭体验和患者安全很重要。结论:大多数医院缺乏非紧急NICU转PICU的临床标准或方案。在那些设定了标准和/或转移协议的人中,发现对转移有效性的看法更为积极。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信