Ilaria Signoria, Maria M Zwartkruis, Lotte Geerlofs, Elena Perenthaler, Kiterie M E Faller, Rachel James, Harriet McHale-Owen, Jared W Green, Joris Kortooms, Sophie H Snellen, Fay-Lynn Asselman, Thomas H Gillingwater, Gabriella Viero, Renske I Wadman, W Ludo van der Pol, Ewout J N Groen
{"title":"Patient-specific responses to <i>SMN2</i> splice-modifying treatments in spinal muscular atrophy fibroblasts.","authors":"Ilaria Signoria, Maria M Zwartkruis, Lotte Geerlofs, Elena Perenthaler, Kiterie M E Faller, Rachel James, Harriet McHale-Owen, Jared W Green, Joris Kortooms, Sophie H Snellen, Fay-Lynn Asselman, Thomas H Gillingwater, Gabriella Viero, Renske I Wadman, W Ludo van der Pol, Ewout J N Groen","doi":"10.1016/j.omtm.2024.101379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The availability of three therapies for the neuromuscular disease spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) highlights the need to match patients to the optimal treatment. Two of these treatments (nusinersen and risdiplam) target splicing of <i>SMN2</i>, but treatment outcomes vary from patient to patient. An incomplete understanding of the complex interactions among SMA genetics, SMN protein and mRNA levels, and gene-targeting treatments, limits our ability to explain this variability and identify optimal treatment strategies for individual patients. To address this, we analyzed responses to nusinersen and risdiplam in 45 primary fibroblast cell lines. Pre-treatment <i>SMN2-FL</i>, <i>SMN2Δ7</i> mRNA, and SMN protein levels were influenced by <i>SMN2</i> copy number, age, and sex. After treatment, SMN and mRNA levels were more heterogeneous. In 43% of patients, response to both therapies was similar, but in 57% one treatment led to a significantly higher SMN increase than the other treatment. Younger age, higher <i>SMN2</i> copy number, and higher SMN levels before treatment predicted better <i>in vitro</i> efficacy. These findings showcase patient-derived fibroblasts as a tool for identifying molecular predictors for personalized treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54333,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Therapy-Methods & Clinical Development","volume":"32 4","pages":"101379"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Therapy-Methods & Clinical Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2024.101379","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The availability of three therapies for the neuromuscular disease spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) highlights the need to match patients to the optimal treatment. Two of these treatments (nusinersen and risdiplam) target splicing of SMN2, but treatment outcomes vary from patient to patient. An incomplete understanding of the complex interactions among SMA genetics, SMN protein and mRNA levels, and gene-targeting treatments, limits our ability to explain this variability and identify optimal treatment strategies for individual patients. To address this, we analyzed responses to nusinersen and risdiplam in 45 primary fibroblast cell lines. Pre-treatment SMN2-FL, SMN2Δ7 mRNA, and SMN protein levels were influenced by SMN2 copy number, age, and sex. After treatment, SMN and mRNA levels were more heterogeneous. In 43% of patients, response to both therapies was similar, but in 57% one treatment led to a significantly higher SMN increase than the other treatment. Younger age, higher SMN2 copy number, and higher SMN levels before treatment predicted better in vitro efficacy. These findings showcase patient-derived fibroblasts as a tool for identifying molecular predictors for personalized treatment.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Molecular Therapy—Methods & Clinical Development is to build upon the success of Molecular Therapy in publishing important peer-reviewed methods and procedures, as well as translational advances in the broad array of fields under the molecular therapy umbrella.
Topics of particular interest within the journal''s scope include:
Gene vector engineering and production,
Methods for targeted genome editing and engineering,
Methods and technology development for cell reprogramming and directed differentiation of pluripotent cells,
Methods for gene and cell vector delivery,
Development of biomaterials and nanoparticles for applications in gene and cell therapy and regenerative medicine,
Analysis of gene and cell vector biodistribution and tracking,
Pharmacology/toxicology studies of new and next-generation vectors,
Methods for cell isolation, engineering, culture, expansion, and transplantation,
Cell processing, storage, and banking for therapeutic application,
Preclinical and QC/QA assay development,
Translational and clinical scale-up and Good Manufacturing procedures and process development,
Clinical protocol development,
Computational and bioinformatic methods for analysis, modeling, or visualization of biological data,
Negotiating the regulatory approval process and obtaining such approval for clinical trials.