Salivary glucose levels and pH in healthy adults with dental caries.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.26402/jpp.2024.5.06
A K Szkaradkiewicz-Karpinska, C Zaba, A Tezyk, G Greczka, A Szkaradkiewicz
{"title":"Salivary glucose levels and pH in healthy adults with dental caries.","authors":"A K Szkaradkiewicz-Karpinska, C Zaba, A Tezyk, G Greczka, A Szkaradkiewicz","doi":"10.26402/jpp.2024.5.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to analyze salivary glucose levels and pH in relation to the intensity of dental caries in healthy, nondiabetic adults. The study was conducted on 61 patients who were assigned to individual groups based on dental examinations and the calculation of the decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) index. Group 1 (control) included 15 caries-free persons (DMFT=0). Group 2 consisted of 15 patients with low caries intensity (DMFT=6.4±1.3). Group 3 comprised 15 patients with moderate caries intensity (DMFT=10.9±1.8). Group 4 included 16 patients with high caries intensity (DMFT=19.2±3.6). Salivary glucose concentration was determined using a quantitative enzymatic method, while salivary pH was measured with a combined electrode. The mean salivary glucose levels in groups 1 and 2 were 2.39±0.62 and 3.28±0.92 mg/dl, respectively. The determined cut-off value for the highest glucose level associated with low caries intensity was 6.64 mg/dl. In contrast, the mean salivary glucose levels in groups 3 and 4 were 7.55±1.16 and 9.9±1.14 mg/dl, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in groups 1 and 2. Regarding salivary pH, the mean values in groups 1 and 2 were 7.19±0.15 and 7.12±0.20, respectively, while in groups 3 and 4, the mean salivary pH were 6.69±0.17 and 6.57±0.19, respectively. These values were significantly lower than the mean values in groups 1 and 2. The data presented here show that increased levels of salivary glucose above 6.64 mg/dl may indicate moderate to high severity of dental caries. Changes in salivary pH may result from the predominant metabolic activity of different species of oral bacteria, including arginolytic, ureolytic or acidogenic bacteria. These findings have important practical implications for monitoring and preventing dental caries.</p>","PeriodicalId":50089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","volume":"75 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26402/jpp.2024.5.06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze salivary glucose levels and pH in relation to the intensity of dental caries in healthy, nondiabetic adults. The study was conducted on 61 patients who were assigned to individual groups based on dental examinations and the calculation of the decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) index. Group 1 (control) included 15 caries-free persons (DMFT=0). Group 2 consisted of 15 patients with low caries intensity (DMFT=6.4±1.3). Group 3 comprised 15 patients with moderate caries intensity (DMFT=10.9±1.8). Group 4 included 16 patients with high caries intensity (DMFT=19.2±3.6). Salivary glucose concentration was determined using a quantitative enzymatic method, while salivary pH was measured with a combined electrode. The mean salivary glucose levels in groups 1 and 2 were 2.39±0.62 and 3.28±0.92 mg/dl, respectively. The determined cut-off value for the highest glucose level associated with low caries intensity was 6.64 mg/dl. In contrast, the mean salivary glucose levels in groups 3 and 4 were 7.55±1.16 and 9.9±1.14 mg/dl, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in groups 1 and 2. Regarding salivary pH, the mean values in groups 1 and 2 were 7.19±0.15 and 7.12±0.20, respectively, while in groups 3 and 4, the mean salivary pH were 6.69±0.17 and 6.57±0.19, respectively. These values were significantly lower than the mean values in groups 1 and 2. The data presented here show that increased levels of salivary glucose above 6.64 mg/dl may indicate moderate to high severity of dental caries. Changes in salivary pH may result from the predominant metabolic activity of different species of oral bacteria, including arginolytic, ureolytic or acidogenic bacteria. These findings have important practical implications for monitoring and preventing dental caries.

患有龋齿的健康成人唾液葡萄糖水平和pH值
本研究旨在分析健康非糖尿病成年人唾液葡萄糖水平和pH值与龋齿强度的关系。本研究以61名患者为研究对象,根据牙齿检查和计算龋缺牙补牙指数(DMFT),将其分为不同的组。第一组(对照组)无龋15例(DMFT=0)。2组15例,低龋强度(DMFT=6.4±1.3)。第三组15例患者为中等龋病强度(DMFT=10.9±1.8)。第4组16例高龋强度患者(DMFT=19.2±3.6)。采用定量酶法测定唾液葡萄糖浓度,采用组合电极测定唾液pH。1组和2组的平均唾液葡萄糖水平分别为2.39±0.62和3.28±0.92 mg/dl。确定的与低龋病强度相关的最高葡萄糖水平的临界值为6.64 mg/dl。3、4组的平均唾液葡萄糖水平分别为7.55±1.16和9.9±1.14 mg/dl,显著高于1、2组。唾液pH值1、2组平均分别为7.19±0.15、7.12±0.20,3、4组平均分别为6.69±0.17、6.57±0.19。这些数值显著低于1组和2组的平均值。这里的数据显示,唾液葡萄糖水平高于6.64 mg/dl可能表明有中度到高度严重的龋齿。唾液pH值的变化可能是由不同种类的口腔细菌的主要代谢活动引起的,包括精氨酸溶解菌、尿溶菌或致酸菌。这些发现对监测和预防龋齿具有重要的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
22.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology publishes papers which fall within the range of basic and applied physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology. The papers should illustrate new physiological or pharmacological mechanisms at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs. Clinical studies, that are of fundamental importance and have a direct bearing on the pathophysiology will also be considered. Letters related to articles published in The Journal with topics of general professional interest are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信