{"title":"Comparison of methotrexate dosing protocols for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation","authors":"Naokazu Nakamura , Junya Kanda , Tadakazu Kondo , Toshiyuki Kitano , Takashi Ikeda , Kazunori Imada , Ryosuke Takaya , Tomoyo Kubo , Satoshi Mitsuyuki , Satoko Oka , Akihito Yonezawa , Tomoharu Takeoka , Takashi Akasaka , Masakatsu Hishizawa , Kazuhiro Yago , Hiroko Tsunemine , Mitsumasa Watanabe , Mitsuru Itoh , Akifumi Takaori-Kondo , Kyoto Stem Cell Transplantation Group (KSCTG)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background aims</h3><div>Methotrexate (MTX) is used as standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, the optimal dosing regimen among the various MTX regimens available remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used the registration data of Kyoto Stem Cell Transplantation Group to compare six MTX dosing protocols in a multicenter retrospective analysis of 816 cases of unrelated bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our findings indicated increased risks of grade Ⅱ–Ⅳ acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD in the cohort given the shortened mini-dose MTX regimen (5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> infusions on days 1, 3, and 6) compared with patients that received any of the other protocols. In addition, transplantation outcomes did not differ significantly between cohorts according to the inclusion or absence of leucovorin rescue.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The original short-term, reduced short-term, and mini-dose MTX methods were all effective for GVHD prophylaxis. However, omission of the day 11 MTX dose from the mini-dose regimen elevated the risks of grade Ⅱ–Ⅳ acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD. Moreover, leucovorin rescue might be ineffective in terms of reducing complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50597,"journal":{"name":"Cytotherapy","volume":"27 3","pages":"Pages 307-315"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1465324924009356","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background aims
Methotrexate (MTX) is used as standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, the optimal dosing regimen among the various MTX regimens available remains unclear.
Methods
We used the registration data of Kyoto Stem Cell Transplantation Group to compare six MTX dosing protocols in a multicenter retrospective analysis of 816 cases of unrelated bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.
Results
Our findings indicated increased risks of grade Ⅱ–Ⅳ acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD in the cohort given the shortened mini-dose MTX regimen (5 mg/m2 infusions on days 1, 3, and 6) compared with patients that received any of the other protocols. In addition, transplantation outcomes did not differ significantly between cohorts according to the inclusion or absence of leucovorin rescue.
Conclusion
The original short-term, reduced short-term, and mini-dose MTX methods were all effective for GVHD prophylaxis. However, omission of the day 11 MTX dose from the mini-dose regimen elevated the risks of grade Ⅱ–Ⅳ acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD. Moreover, leucovorin rescue might be ineffective in terms of reducing complications.
期刊介绍:
The journal brings readers the latest developments in the fast moving field of cellular therapy in man. This includes cell therapy for cancer, immune disorders, inherited diseases, tissue repair and regenerative medicine. The journal covers the science, translational development and treatment with variety of cell types including hematopoietic stem cells, immune cells (dendritic cells, NK, cells, T cells, antigen presenting cells) mesenchymal stromal cells, adipose cells, nerve, muscle, vascular and endothelial cells, and induced pluripotential stem cells. We also welcome manuscripts on subcellular derivatives such as exosomes. A specific focus is on translational research that brings cell therapy to the clinic. Cytotherapy publishes original papers, reviews, position papers editorials, commentaries and letters to the editor. We welcome "Protocols in Cytotherapy" bringing standard operating procedure for production specific cell types for clinical use within the reach of the readership.