A Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Evidence-Based Design for Aligning Therapeutic and Sustainability Outcomes in Healthcare Facilities: A Systematic Literature Review.
IF 1.7 4区 医学Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"A Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Evidence-Based Design for Aligning Therapeutic and Sustainability Outcomes in Healthcare Facilities: A Systematic Literature Review.","authors":"Julia Read, Cristyn Meath","doi":"10.1177/19375867241302793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The aim of this systematic review was to identify which aspects of evidence-based design (EBD) and sustainable design principles overlap based on evidence in the peer reviewed academic literature. By doing so, the study enables hospital infrastructure design decisions that prioritize both sustainability outcomes (sustainable hospital infrastructure design) and therapeutic (EBD) outcomes. <b>Background:</b> Healthcare facilities need to adapt to the future demands from a changing climate, demographic shifts, and economic restraints. Facilities need to be designed in ways that better support patients, staff, and the environment to ensure their long-term success. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic literature search was conducted through searches in SCOPUS and Web of Science. All studies in acute care settings were included in the review except those investigating EBD in the context of specific health conditions, which were excluded. Themes that overlap were identified to form a conceptual framework for sustainable EBD. <b>Results:</b> Sixty-five articles were included in the final analysis. Identified sustainability features were related to: <i>Sociocultural and functional</i>, <i>Indoor environmental quality and wellbeing, Energy and atmosphere, Water, Materials and resources, Waste, Sustainable sites,</i> and <i>Facility design.</i> EBD thematic analyses were categorized into <i>Indoor environmental quality, Design, Sociocultural,</i> and <i>Functional performance and safety</i>. <b>Conclusions:</b> Key areas of synergy include <i>Indoor environmental quality and wellbeing</i> and <i>Energy and atmosphere.</i> The development of the conceptual framework enables scholars and practitioners to identify design features that align both priorities and through future research, refine the framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":47306,"journal":{"name":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":"86-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867241302793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to identify which aspects of evidence-based design (EBD) and sustainable design principles overlap based on evidence in the peer reviewed academic literature. By doing so, the study enables hospital infrastructure design decisions that prioritize both sustainability outcomes (sustainable hospital infrastructure design) and therapeutic (EBD) outcomes. Background: Healthcare facilities need to adapt to the future demands from a changing climate, demographic shifts, and economic restraints. Facilities need to be designed in ways that better support patients, staff, and the environment to ensure their long-term success. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted through searches in SCOPUS and Web of Science. All studies in acute care settings were included in the review except those investigating EBD in the context of specific health conditions, which were excluded. Themes that overlap were identified to form a conceptual framework for sustainable EBD. Results: Sixty-five articles were included in the final analysis. Identified sustainability features were related to: Sociocultural and functional, Indoor environmental quality and wellbeing, Energy and atmosphere, Water, Materials and resources, Waste, Sustainable sites, and Facility design. EBD thematic analyses were categorized into Indoor environmental quality, Design, Sociocultural, and Functional performance and safety. Conclusions: Key areas of synergy include Indoor environmental quality and wellbeing and Energy and atmosphere. The development of the conceptual framework enables scholars and practitioners to identify design features that align both priorities and through future research, refine the framework.
目的:本系统综述的目的是根据同行评议的学术文献中的证据,确定循证设计(EBD)和可持续设计原则的哪些方面重叠。通过这样做,该研究使医院基础设施设计决策能够优先考虑可持续性结果(可持续医院基础设施设计)和治疗(EBD)结果。背景:医疗保健设施需要适应气候变化、人口变化和经济限制带来的未来需求。设施的设计需要更好地支持患者、工作人员和环境,以确保其长期成功。方法:通过SCOPUS和Web of Science进行系统的文献检索。除了那些在特定健康状况下调查EBD的研究外,所有在急性护理环境下的研究都被纳入了本综述。确定了重叠的主题,以形成可持续EBD的概念框架。结果:共纳入65篇文献。确定的可持续性特征涉及:社会文化和功能、室内环境质量和健康、能源和大气、水、材料和资源、废物、可持续场地和设施设计。EBD的主题分析分为室内环境质量、设计、社会文化、功能性能和安全。结论:协同作用的关键领域包括室内环境质量和健康以及能源和氛围。概念框架的发展使学者和实践者能够确定设计特征,使其与优先事项保持一致,并通过未来的研究来完善框架。