Becoming Leaders - A Qualitative Research Study on the Priorities and Concerns of Early Career Women Faculty in Academic Medicine.

IF 3.4 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Healthcare Leadership Pub Date : 2024-12-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHL.S499001
Olivia Liu, Suzanne M Grieb, Jordan N Halsey, Rachel B Levine, Maria Oliva-Hemker, Jennifer K Lee
{"title":"Becoming Leaders - A Qualitative Research Study on the Priorities and Concerns of Early Career Women Faculty in Academic Medicine.","authors":"Olivia Liu, Suzanne M Grieb, Jordan N Halsey, Rachel B Levine, Maria Oliva-Hemker, Jennifer K Lee","doi":"10.2147/JHL.S499001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gender inequity persists in high-level leadership within academic medicine. Understanding the perspectives of early career women faculty could clarify how to recruit and support women who pursue high-level leadership. This study explored the specific priorities and concerns that may influence the recruitment of women leaders in the future.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five assistant professors (mean: 1.8 years at rank) completed the Early Career Women's Leadership Program and participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews in 2023. Data were analyzed using an iterative, thematic constant comparison process informed by constructivist grounded theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors identified four themes. In theme one, participants described the <i>importance of being seen and valued as a whole person</i>, with consideration of their personal and professional lives. They sought mentorship and leadership positions that supported their work-life integration. In theme two, <i>women balanced an interplay between the individual and the collective</i> when considering themselves as future leaders. From the individual perspective, participants prioritized personal values like humility and compassion when discussing preferred leadership styles. From the collective perspective, they prioritized inclusivity and teamwork. Theme three showed <i>discomfort with the unknown</i> with a desire to fully understand a leadership position and its impact on personal and professional life. Participants wondered about having the authority and resources to realistically make meaningful change and whether they could adequately prepare to lead. The fourth theme was <i>representation mattered</i>. Participants valued having women leaders who have experienced similar challenges as themselves. These leaders inspired participants to believe that they could also achieve and succeed in high-level leadership.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early career women balanced numerous factors when considering whether to pursue high-level leadership in academic medicine. Understanding women's priorities and concerns can enable institutions to prepare women faculty to lead and ultimately recruit and retain them in high-level leadership.</p>","PeriodicalId":44346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","volume":"16 ","pages":"511-523"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S499001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gender inequity persists in high-level leadership within academic medicine. Understanding the perspectives of early career women faculty could clarify how to recruit and support women who pursue high-level leadership. This study explored the specific priorities and concerns that may influence the recruitment of women leaders in the future.

Methods: Twenty-five assistant professors (mean: 1.8 years at rank) completed the Early Career Women's Leadership Program and participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews in 2023. Data were analyzed using an iterative, thematic constant comparison process informed by constructivist grounded theory.

Results: The authors identified four themes. In theme one, participants described the importance of being seen and valued as a whole person, with consideration of their personal and professional lives. They sought mentorship and leadership positions that supported their work-life integration. In theme two, women balanced an interplay between the individual and the collective when considering themselves as future leaders. From the individual perspective, participants prioritized personal values like humility and compassion when discussing preferred leadership styles. From the collective perspective, they prioritized inclusivity and teamwork. Theme three showed discomfort with the unknown with a desire to fully understand a leadership position and its impact on personal and professional life. Participants wondered about having the authority and resources to realistically make meaningful change and whether they could adequately prepare to lead. The fourth theme was representation mattered. Participants valued having women leaders who have experienced similar challenges as themselves. These leaders inspired participants to believe that they could also achieve and succeed in high-level leadership.

Conclusion: Early career women balanced numerous factors when considering whether to pursue high-level leadership in academic medicine. Understanding women's priorities and concerns can enable institutions to prepare women faculty to lead and ultimately recruit and retain them in high-level leadership.

成为领导者-关于学术医学早期职业女性教师优先事项和关注点的定性研究。
背景:在学术医学的高层领导中,性别不平等仍然存在。了解早期职业女性教师的观点可以澄清如何招募和支持追求高层领导的女性。本研究探讨了可能影响今后征聘妇女领导人的具体优先事项和关切问题。方法:25位助理教授(平均在职1.8年)于2023年完成了早期职业女性领导力项目,并参加了半结构化的深度访谈。数据分析使用一个迭代的,主题恒定的比较过程,根据建构主义理论。结果:作者确定了四个主题。在主题一中,参与者描述了作为一个完整的人被看待和重视的重要性,同时考虑到他们的个人和职业生活。他们寻求指导和领导职位,支持他们的工作与生活的融合。在主题二中,女性在考虑自己是未来的领导者时,平衡了个人与集体之间的相互作用。从个人的角度来看,参与者在讨论首选的领导风格时优先考虑了谦逊和同情心等个人价值观。从集体的角度来看,他们优先考虑包容性和团队合作。主题三表现出对未知的不安,渴望充分理解领导职位及其对个人和职业生活的影响。与会者想知道是否有权力和资源来实际地进行有意义的变革,以及他们是否能够为领导做好充分的准备。第四个主题是代表性很重要。与会者重视有与自己经历过类似挑战的女性领导。这些领导者激励参与者相信他们也可以在高层领导中取得成功。结论:早期职业女性在考虑是否追求学术医学的高层领导时权衡了许多因素。了解妇女的优先事项和关切事项可以使各机构培养女教员领导,并最终征聘和保留她们担任高层领导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Leadership
Journal of Healthcare Leadership HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Efficient and successful modern healthcare depends on a growing group of professionals working together as an interdisciplinary team. However, many forces shape the delivery of healthcare; changes are being driven by the markets, transformations in concepts of health and wellbeing, technology and research and discovery. Dynamic leadership will guide these necessary transformations. The Journal of Healthcare Leadership is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on leadership for the healthcare professions. The publication strives to amalgamate current and future healthcare professionals and managers by providing key insights into leadership progress and challenges to improve patient care. The journal aspires to inform key decision makers and those professionals with ambitions of leadership and management; it seeks to connect professionals who are engaged in similar endeavours and to provide wisdom from those working in other industries. Senior and trainee doctors, nurses and allied healthcare professionals, medical students, healthcare managers and allied leaders are invited to contribute to this publication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信