Auspice and other policy-related variations in preschool practice in the United States: have public preschool programs been more academic?

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
W Steven Barnett, Kwanghee Jung
{"title":"Auspice and other policy-related variations in preschool practice in the United States: have public preschool programs been more academic?","authors":"W Steven Barnett, Kwanghee Jung","doi":"10.1186/s40723-024-00139-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the extent to which practices considered developmentally appropriate and inappropriate varied by preschool program auspice (private, public school, and Head Start). Survey data from a 2010 national sample of 2,664 teachers of 4-year-olds provided teacher reports on the frequency of seven practices (e.g., offering children choices of play activities, using flashcards and math worksheets), approach to teaching subject matter, and time spent in whole group activities. More than 90 percent of teachers in all auspices reported high frequencies of some developmentally appropriate practices (DAP). Yet, private program teachers reported less DAP, more use of flashcards and worksheets, and more whole group time per day than teachers in the two public sectors. Some but not all differences by auspice could be explained by differences in teacher and classroom characteristics by auspice. In the context of other studies indicating little change in practice since 2010, our results suggest that increased public provision of preschool education does not lead to \"academization.\" We identify several other issues related to curriculum and \"instruction\" in preschool education requiring increased attention from researchers and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":44258,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy","volume":"18 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-024-00139-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the extent to which practices considered developmentally appropriate and inappropriate varied by preschool program auspice (private, public school, and Head Start). Survey data from a 2010 national sample of 2,664 teachers of 4-year-olds provided teacher reports on the frequency of seven practices (e.g., offering children choices of play activities, using flashcards and math worksheets), approach to teaching subject matter, and time spent in whole group activities. More than 90 percent of teachers in all auspices reported high frequencies of some developmentally appropriate practices (DAP). Yet, private program teachers reported less DAP, more use of flashcards and worksheets, and more whole group time per day than teachers in the two public sectors. Some but not all differences by auspice could be explained by differences in teacher and classroom characteristics by auspice. In the context of other studies indicating little change in practice since 2010, our results suggest that increased public provision of preschool education does not lead to "academization." We identify several other issues related to curriculum and "instruction" in preschool education requiring increased attention from researchers and policymakers.

美国学前教育实践中的吉兆和其他与政策相关的变化:公立学前教育项目是否更加学术化?
我们调查了根据学前教育计划(私立、公立学校和启智教育)的不同,被认为是发展适宜和不适宜的实践的程度。来自2010年全国2664名4岁儿童教师样本的调查数据提供了关于七种实践(例如,为儿童提供游戏活动选择,使用抽抽卡和数学工作表),教学主题方法和整个小组活动花费时间的教师报告。在所有赞助的教师中,超过90%的教师报告了一些适合发展的实践(DAP)的高频率。然而,与两个公共部门的教师相比,私立项目的教师报告说DAP更少,更多地使用抽认卡和工作表,每天的整个小组时间更长。一些但不是全部的吉兆差异可以用吉兆在教师和课堂特征上的差异来解释。在其他研究表明自2010年以来实践变化不大的背景下,我们的研究结果表明,增加公共学前教育并没有导致“学院化”。我们确定了与学前教育课程和“教学”相关的其他几个问题,需要研究人员和政策制定者给予更多的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信