The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on first-episode psychosis presentations in two early intervention in psychosis services.

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
A Duggan, S Buckley, E Fletcher, D O'Keeffe, S Naughton, K O'Connor, M Clarke
{"title":"The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on first-episode psychosis presentations in two early intervention in psychosis services.","authors":"A Duggan, S Buckley, E Fletcher, D O'Keeffe, S Naughton, K O'Connor, M Clarke","doi":"10.1017/ipm.2024.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on first-episode psychosis (FEP) presentations across two Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services in Ireland, by comparing pre-pandemic and post-pandemic cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational design with retrospective medical record review was employed. The study population comprised 187 FEP patients (77 in pre-pandemic and 110 in post-pandemic cohort). Outcomes measured included duration of untreated psychosis (DUP), FEP presentation numbers, referral sources, global assessment of functioning scores, inpatient admissions, substance misuse and service delivery methods. Statistical analyses utilised chi-square tests to assess categorical variables, Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests to compare non-normally distributed continuous variables and Kruskal-Wallis tests to examine interactions between categorical and continuous variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant increase in FEP presentations was observed in the post-pandemic cohort (<i>p</i> = 0.003), with an increase in all urban areas and a decrease in the study's only rural area. The difference in DUP between cohorts was not significant. However, significant interaction between gender, cohort and DUP was shown (<i>p</i> = 0.008), with women in the post-pandemic cohort experiencing longer DUP (<i>p</i> = 0.01). A significant rise in telephone (<i>p</i> = 0.05) and video consultations (<i>p</i> = 0.001) offered was observed, in the post-pandemic cohort. A similar number of in-person appointments were attended across both cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the impact of the pandemic on FEP presentations, particularly rurally and regarding increased DUP among women. These findings underscore the need for flexible EIP services to respond to public health crises. Despite increased presentations, services adapted, maintaining service continuity through telehealth and modified in-person contact.</p>","PeriodicalId":46220,"journal":{"name":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2024.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on first-episode psychosis (FEP) presentations across two Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services in Ireland, by comparing pre-pandemic and post-pandemic cohorts.

Methods: A cross-sectional observational design with retrospective medical record review was employed. The study population comprised 187 FEP patients (77 in pre-pandemic and 110 in post-pandemic cohort). Outcomes measured included duration of untreated psychosis (DUP), FEP presentation numbers, referral sources, global assessment of functioning scores, inpatient admissions, substance misuse and service delivery methods. Statistical analyses utilised chi-square tests to assess categorical variables, Mann-Whitney U tests to compare non-normally distributed continuous variables and Kruskal-Wallis tests to examine interactions between categorical and continuous variables.

Results: A significant increase in FEP presentations was observed in the post-pandemic cohort (p = 0.003), with an increase in all urban areas and a decrease in the study's only rural area. The difference in DUP between cohorts was not significant. However, significant interaction between gender, cohort and DUP was shown (p = 0.008), with women in the post-pandemic cohort experiencing longer DUP (p = 0.01). A significant rise in telephone (p = 0.05) and video consultations (p = 0.001) offered was observed, in the post-pandemic cohort. A similar number of in-person appointments were attended across both cohorts.

Conclusions: This study highlights the impact of the pandemic on FEP presentations, particularly rurally and regarding increased DUP among women. These findings underscore the need for flexible EIP services to respond to public health crises. Despite increased presentations, services adapted, maintaining service continuity through telehealth and modified in-person contact.

COVID-19大流行对两次精神病服务早期干预中首发精神病表现的影响
目的:通过比较大流行前和大流行后的队列,评估2019冠状病毒病大流行对爱尔兰两个精神病早期干预(EIP)服务中首发精神病(FEP)表现的影响。方法:采用回顾性病历回顾的横断面观察设计。研究人群包括187例FEP患者(大流行前队列77例,大流行后队列110例)。测量的结果包括未治疗精神病的持续时间(DUP)、FEP表现次数、转诊来源、功能评分的总体评估、住院人数、药物滥用和服务提供方法。统计分析使用卡方检验来评估分类变量,使用Mann-Whitney U检验来比较非正态分布的连续变量,使用Kruskal-Wallis检验来检查分类变量和连续变量之间的相互作用。结果:在大流行后队列中,观察到FEP的出现显著增加(p = 0.003),所有城市地区都有所增加,研究中唯一的农村地区有所减少。各组间DUP差异无统计学意义。然而,性别、队列和DUP之间存在显著的相互作用(p = 0.008),大流行后队列中的女性DUP时间更长(p = 0.01)。在大流行后队列中,观察到电话咨询(p = 0.05)和视频咨询(p = 0.001)的显著增加。在这两个队列中,参加面对面预约的人数相似。结论:这项研究强调了大流行对FEP表现的影响,特别是在农村和妇女DUP增加方面。这些发现强调需要灵活的环境知识产权服务来应对公共卫生危机。尽管增加了介绍,但调整了服务,通过远程保健和改进的面对面接触保持了服务的连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.90%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信