[Influence of the treatment setting on the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis within the delegation to rheumatological specialist assistants - A post hoc analysis of the StärkeR study].

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rilind Shabani, Anna Mai, Robin Denz, Nina Timmesfeld, Jürgen Braun, Dietmar Krause
{"title":"[Influence of the treatment setting on the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis within the delegation to rheumatological specialist assistants - A post hoc analysis of the StärkeR study].","authors":"Rilind Shabani, Anna Mai, Robin Denz, Nina Timmesfeld, Jürgen Braun, Dietmar Krause","doi":"10.1007/s00393-024-01606-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The StärkeR study has shown the non-inferiority of a team-based form of care with delegation to rheumatological specialist assistants (RFA) compared to standard care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Exploratory analyses regarding a possible influence of the treatment setting (specialist practice/outpatient clinic) on various outcome parameters in patients with RA or PsA in the context of delegation to RFA.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients with RA or PsA and stable adjustment with low disease activity from 3 outpatient clinics and 14 rheumatological specialist practices that participated in the StärkeR study were included in this post hoc analysis. The effectiveness of the team-based form of care depending on the treatment setting was investigated using interaction analyses in linear regression models with respect to disease activity, functional capacity, pain and fatigue, among others.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 588 patients 466 were treated in specialized practices and 92 in hospital outpatient clinics. The analyses showed a significant interaction for one of nine outcomes examined: functional capacity (scale 0-1) had slightly lower values in the hospital outpatient clinics compared to standard care (-0.07 [-0.12; -0.02]), while no such difference was found in the practices. For other outcomes, the team-based form of care in the practice setting tended to show an advantage.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These exploratory analyses point to the potential benefits of evaluating different forms of care, such as the delegation of medical services to qualified RFA, in terms of benchmarking.</p>","PeriodicalId":23834,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-024-01606-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The StärkeR study has shown the non-inferiority of a team-based form of care with delegation to rheumatological specialist assistants (RFA) compared to standard care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Objective: Exploratory analyses regarding a possible influence of the treatment setting (specialist practice/outpatient clinic) on various outcome parameters in patients with RA or PsA in the context of delegation to RFA.

Material and methods: Patients with RA or PsA and stable adjustment with low disease activity from 3 outpatient clinics and 14 rheumatological specialist practices that participated in the StärkeR study were included in this post hoc analysis. The effectiveness of the team-based form of care depending on the treatment setting was investigated using interaction analyses in linear regression models with respect to disease activity, functional capacity, pain and fatigue, among others.

Results: Out of 588 patients 466 were treated in specialized practices and 92 in hospital outpatient clinics. The analyses showed a significant interaction for one of nine outcomes examined: functional capacity (scale 0-1) had slightly lower values in the hospital outpatient clinics compared to standard care (-0.07 [-0.12; -0.02]), while no such difference was found in the practices. For other outcomes, the team-based form of care in the practice setting tended to show an advantage.

Discussion: These exploratory analyses point to the potential benefits of evaluating different forms of care, such as the delegation of medical services to qualified RFA, in terms of benchmarking.

[在风湿病专家助理代表团中,治疗环境对类风湿关节炎或银屑病关节炎患者治疗的影响——StärkeR研究的事后分析]。
背景:StärkeR研究表明,与类风湿关节炎(RA)或银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者的标准治疗相比,委托风湿病专家助理(RFA)进行以团队为基础的护理形式的非劣等性。目的:探索性分析在RFA授权的情况下,治疗环境(专科诊所/门诊诊所)对RA或PsA患者各种结局参数的可能影响。材料和方法:参与StärkeR研究的来自3个门诊诊所和14个风湿病专科诊所的RA或PsA稳定调整且疾病活动性低的患者纳入该事后分析。根据治疗环境的不同,采用线性回归模型中的相互作用分析,研究了基于团队的护理形式的有效性,其中涉及疾病活动性、功能能力、疼痛和疲劳等。结果:588例患者中466例在专科医院就诊,92例在医院门诊就诊。分析显示,9项结果中有一项具有显著的相互作用:与标准治疗相比,医院门诊的功能能力(量表0-1)值略低(-0.07 [-0.12;-0.02]),而在实践中没有发现这种差异。对于其他结果,在实践环境中以团队为基础的护理形式往往显示出优势。讨论:这些探索性分析指出了评估不同形式的护理的潜在好处,例如将医疗服务委托给合格的RFA,就基准而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie ist ein international angesehenes Publikationsorgan und dient der Fortbildung von niedergelassenen und in der Klinik tätigen Rheumatologen. Die Zeitschrift widmet sich allen Aspekten der klinischen Rheumatologie, der Therapie rheumatischer Erkrankungen sowie der rheumatologischen Grundlagenforschung. Umfassende Übersichtsarbeiten zu einem aktuellen Schwerpunktthema sind das Kernstück jeder Ausgabe. Im Mittelpunkt steht dabei gesichertes Wissen zu Diagnostik und Therapie mit hoher Relevanz für die tägliche Arbeit – der Leser erhält konkrete Handlungsempfehlungen. Frei eingereichte Originalien ermöglichen die Präsentation wichtiger klinischer Studien und dienen dem wissenschaftlichen Austausch.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信