Associations between maternal gestational diabetes mellitus and offspring cerebral palsy: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Translational pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.21037/tp-24-260
Honghao Peng, Yun Shu, Siyu Lu, Qiongli Fan, Yuping Zhang, Li Ming, Zhifeng Wu
{"title":"Associations between maternal gestational diabetes mellitus and offspring cerebral palsy: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Honghao Peng, Yun Shu, Siyu Lu, Qiongli Fan, Yuping Zhang, Li Ming, Zhifeng Wu","doi":"10.21037/tp-24-260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational studies on the association between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during pregnancy and pediatric neurological disorders (PNDs) such as cerebral palsy (CP), autism spectrum disorders (ASD), and epilepsy (EP) in offspring have yielded mixed findings, creating ambiguity in causal interpretations. The direct link between GDM and these PNDs remains unclear. Elucidating this connection is vital for developing effective early intervention strategies during pregnancy to mitigate the risk of PNDs in the offspring. This study utilizes a two-sample (2-sample) Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to investigate the causal relationship between GDM and its impact on CP, ASD, and EP in offspring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed 2-sample MR using 6 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) strongly associated with GDM. Summary-level data for CP, ASD, and EP were obtained from the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) Open Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) project, encompassing sample sizes of 217,278, 46,351, and 463,010, respectively. The robustness of our findings was assessed using the inverse variance-weighted (IVW) method along with additional sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrate that GDM is associated with a higher risk of offspring CP as determined by the IVW method [odds ratio (OR): 1.74; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-2.37; P<0.001]. In contrast, no association was observed between GDM and ASD or EP. Additionally, alternative methods for sensitivity analyses showed consistent results, and there was no pleiotropy detected using MR-Egger regression (P=0.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides strong evidence supporting a positive causal relationship between genetically predicted GDM and the increased risk of offspring CP, with no observed correlation found with ASD or EP.</p>","PeriodicalId":23294,"journal":{"name":"Translational pediatrics","volume":"13 11","pages":"1923-1932"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-24-260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Observational studies on the association between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during pregnancy and pediatric neurological disorders (PNDs) such as cerebral palsy (CP), autism spectrum disorders (ASD), and epilepsy (EP) in offspring have yielded mixed findings, creating ambiguity in causal interpretations. The direct link between GDM and these PNDs remains unclear. Elucidating this connection is vital for developing effective early intervention strategies during pregnancy to mitigate the risk of PNDs in the offspring. This study utilizes a two-sample (2-sample) Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to investigate the causal relationship between GDM and its impact on CP, ASD, and EP in offspring.

Methods: We employed 2-sample MR using 6 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) strongly associated with GDM. Summary-level data for CP, ASD, and EP were obtained from the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) Open Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) project, encompassing sample sizes of 217,278, 46,351, and 463,010, respectively. The robustness of our findings was assessed using the inverse variance-weighted (IVW) method along with additional sensitivity analyses.

Results: The results demonstrate that GDM is associated with a higher risk of offspring CP as determined by the IVW method [odds ratio (OR): 1.74; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-2.37; P<0.001]. In contrast, no association was observed between GDM and ASD or EP. Additionally, alternative methods for sensitivity analyses showed consistent results, and there was no pleiotropy detected using MR-Egger regression (P=0.48).

Conclusions: This study provides strong evidence supporting a positive causal relationship between genetically predicted GDM and the increased risk of offspring CP, with no observed correlation found with ASD or EP.

母亲妊娠期糖尿病与后代脑瘫之间的关系:一项双样本孟德尔随机研究。
背景:关于妊娠期妊娠糖尿病(GDM)与后代脑瘫(CP)、自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和癫痫(EP)等儿童神经系统疾病(pnd)之间关系的观察性研究得出了不同的结果,导致因果解释不明确。GDM与这些pnd之间的直接联系尚不清楚。阐明这种联系对于在怀孕期间制定有效的早期干预策略以减轻后代患pnd的风险至关重要。本研究采用双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)方法研究GDM及其对后代CP、ASD和EP的影响之间的因果关系。方法:对6个与GDM密切相关的单核苷酸多态性(snp)进行双样本MR分析。CP、ASD和EP的汇总数据来自综合流行病学单位(IEU)开放全基因组关联研究(GWAS)项目,样样量分别为217,278、46,351和463,010。我们的研究结果的稳健性是使用逆方差加权(IVW)方法以及附加的敏感性分析来评估的。结果:结果表明,IVW方法确定的GDM与后代CP的高风险相关[优势比(OR): 1.74;95%置信区间(CI): 1.27-2.37;结论:本研究提供了强有力的证据,支持遗传预测的GDM与后代CP风险增加之间存在正因果关系,但未发现与ASD或EP相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational pediatrics
Translational pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信