Guangxiong Yuan, Hongfei Sang, Thanh N Nguyen, Xiaochuan Huo, Yuesong Pan, Mengxing Wang, Zhongming Qiu, Lei Liu, Hong Xia, Junxiong Wu, Chen Long, Jun Xu, Feng Huang, Bo He, Derong Wu, Hailing Wang, Can Feng, Yong Liang, Xianghong Zhou, Wenbin Yang, Zhu Huang, Youxi Xiang, Libo Lei, Jeffrey L Saver, Zhongrong Miao, Xueli Cai
{"title":"Association Between Time to Treatment and Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy vs Medical Management in Patients With Large Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Guangxiong Yuan, Hongfei Sang, Thanh N Nguyen, Xiaochuan Huo, Yuesong Pan, Mengxing Wang, Zhongming Qiu, Lei Liu, Hong Xia, Junxiong Wu, Chen Long, Jun Xu, Feng Huang, Bo He, Derong Wu, Hailing Wang, Can Feng, Yong Liang, Xianghong Zhou, Wenbin Yang, Zhu Huang, Youxi Xiang, Libo Lei, Jeffrey L Saver, Zhongrong Miao, Xueli Cai","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000210133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Randomized trials have proven the benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute large ischemic stroke. This study was to characterize the effect of time to treatment on benefit of EVT vs medical management (MM) among patients with large ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a post hoc analysis of the Endovascular Therapy in Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients with a Large Infarct Core randomized trial. Patients who had an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score of 3-5 or an ischemic core volume of 70-100 mL within 24 hours of symptom onset were treated with EVT plus MM or MM. Onset-to-expected arterial puncture time (OPT) was analyzed as a categorical variable (<6, 6-<12, and 12-24 hours) using binary logistic regression and as a continuous variable using a multivariable fractional polynomial interaction. The primary efficacy outcome was favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale scores 0-3) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 451 patients (median age 68 years; 61.4% were men; median OPT 487 minutes [interquartile range 328-802]), 226 patients received EVT and 225 patients received MM. The EVT group showed higher rates of favorable outcomes than the MM group within OPT of 6 hours (44.4% vs 29.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.78, 95% CI 1.22-6.32) and 6-12 hours (45.7% vs 29.6%, aOR 2.39 [95% CI 1.21-4.71]), but not in OPT beyond 12 hours (51.6% vs 41.4%, aOR 2.05 [95% CI 0.88-4.77]). The benefit became nonsignificant after OPT of 13 hours and 22 minutes. In 3 OPT intervals, the rates of symptomatic ICH and mortality were similar between EVT and MM although the rate of any ICH increased. However, no interaction effect was found (all <i>p</i> interactions >0.10).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings strengthen the benefit of EVT initiated within 13 hours and 22 minutes after symptom onset compared with MM alone in patients with large ischemic stroke, but EVT should not be withheld for patients presenting beyond 13 hours and 22 minutes. Pooled analysis of larger sample sizes is needed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration information: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04551664.</p><p><strong>Classification of evidence: </strong>This study provides Class II evidence that EVT is associated with improved functional outcomes for acute large ischemic stroke within 24 hours after last known well, with no interaction by time.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"104 1","pages":"e210133"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000210133","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Randomized trials have proven the benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute large ischemic stroke. This study was to characterize the effect of time to treatment on benefit of EVT vs medical management (MM) among patients with large ischemic stroke.
Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of the Endovascular Therapy in Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients with a Large Infarct Core randomized trial. Patients who had an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score of 3-5 or an ischemic core volume of 70-100 mL within 24 hours of symptom onset were treated with EVT plus MM or MM. Onset-to-expected arterial puncture time (OPT) was analyzed as a categorical variable (<6, 6-<12, and 12-24 hours) using binary logistic regression and as a continuous variable using a multivariable fractional polynomial interaction. The primary efficacy outcome was favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale scores 0-3) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH, and mortality.
Results: Among 451 patients (median age 68 years; 61.4% were men; median OPT 487 minutes [interquartile range 328-802]), 226 patients received EVT and 225 patients received MM. The EVT group showed higher rates of favorable outcomes than the MM group within OPT of 6 hours (44.4% vs 29.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.78, 95% CI 1.22-6.32) and 6-12 hours (45.7% vs 29.6%, aOR 2.39 [95% CI 1.21-4.71]), but not in OPT beyond 12 hours (51.6% vs 41.4%, aOR 2.05 [95% CI 0.88-4.77]). The benefit became nonsignificant after OPT of 13 hours and 22 minutes. In 3 OPT intervals, the rates of symptomatic ICH and mortality were similar between EVT and MM although the rate of any ICH increased. However, no interaction effect was found (all p interactions >0.10).
Discussion: These findings strengthen the benefit of EVT initiated within 13 hours and 22 minutes after symptom onset compared with MM alone in patients with large ischemic stroke, but EVT should not be withheld for patients presenting beyond 13 hours and 22 minutes. Pooled analysis of larger sample sizes is needed.
Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that EVT is associated with improved functional outcomes for acute large ischemic stroke within 24 hours after last known well, with no interaction by time.
背景和目的:随机试验已经证明血管内治疗(EVT)对急性大面积缺血性脑卒中的益处。本研究旨在描述治疗时间对EVT与医疗管理(MM)在大缺血性脑卒中患者中的获益的影响。方法:这是一项随机试验,对急性前循环大血管闭塞患者的血管内治疗进行事后分析。阿尔伯塔卒中项目早期计算机断层扫描评分为3-5分或症状发作24小时内缺血核心容量为70-100毫升的患者接受EVT + MM或MM治疗。发病至预期动脉穿刺时间(OPT)作为分类变量进行分析(结果:451例患者(中位年龄68岁;61.4%为男性;中位OPT 487分钟[四分位数范围328-802]),226例患者接受EVT, 225例患者接受MM。EVT组在OPT 6小时内(44.4% vs 29.9%,调整优势比[aOR] 2.78, 95% CI 1.22-6.32)和6-12小时(45.7% vs 29.6%, aOR 2.39 [95% CI 1.21-4.71])的良好预后率高于MM组,但在OPT 12小时以上(51.6% vs 41.4%, aOR 2.05 [95% CI 0.88-4.77])。在13小时22分钟的OPT后,益处变得不明显。在3个OPT期间,EVT和MM的症状性脑出血率和死亡率相似,尽管脑出血率有所增加。然而,没有发现相互作用效应(所有p相互作用>0.10)。讨论:这些发现加强了在症状出现后13小时22分钟内开始EVT的益处,而不是单纯的MM,但对于超过13小时22分钟的患者,EVT不应该被推迟。需要更大样本量的合并分析。试验注册信息:ClinicalTrials.gov;NCT04551664。证据分类:本研究提供的II类证据表明,EVT与急性大面积缺血性卒中患者术后24小时内功能预后改善相关,且无时间相互作用。
期刊介绍:
Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology.
As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content.
Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.