The Clinical Utility of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale: A Treatment Perspective.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Joost Hutsebaut, Donna S Bender
{"title":"The Clinical Utility of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale: A Treatment Perspective.","authors":"Joost Hutsebaut, Donna S Bender","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS) was introduced in DSM-5 to articulate a conceptual foundation for all types of personality psychopathology, and to provide an assessment of the severity of impairment. Constructed using universal human capacities related to self- and interpersonal functioning, the LPFS defines a continuum of 5 levels ranging from optimal functioning to extreme impairments in functioning. While there have been a growing number of empirical studies demonstrating its reliability and validity, the LPFS was designed fundamentally as an informative clinical tool, potentially useful to practitioners working in a variety of roles using diverse interventions. This article addresses the issue of treatment utility from 2 particular perspectives. First, we illustrate how the capacities targeted by the LPFS offer a framework for treatment, applicable to a variety of theoretical or methodological orientations. We illustrate that the different facets of the LPFS may provide general aims for treatment by identifying the pathways through which change is realized in (whatever) psychotherapy. Second, we suggest how the levels of functioning may inform pathways toward change by providing information useful for treatment assignment and planning, such as the therapist's stance, the types of intervention, and specific goals in treatment. Through discussing these issues while using brief clinical vignettes, we hope that this article may stimulate clinicians to use the LPFS and discover its value in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"30 6","pages":"411-420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000822","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS) was introduced in DSM-5 to articulate a conceptual foundation for all types of personality psychopathology, and to provide an assessment of the severity of impairment. Constructed using universal human capacities related to self- and interpersonal functioning, the LPFS defines a continuum of 5 levels ranging from optimal functioning to extreme impairments in functioning. While there have been a growing number of empirical studies demonstrating its reliability and validity, the LPFS was designed fundamentally as an informative clinical tool, potentially useful to practitioners working in a variety of roles using diverse interventions. This article addresses the issue of treatment utility from 2 particular perspectives. First, we illustrate how the capacities targeted by the LPFS offer a framework for treatment, applicable to a variety of theoretical or methodological orientations. We illustrate that the different facets of the LPFS may provide general aims for treatment by identifying the pathways through which change is realized in (whatever) psychotherapy. Second, we suggest how the levels of functioning may inform pathways toward change by providing information useful for treatment assignment and planning, such as the therapist's stance, the types of intervention, and specific goals in treatment. Through discussing these issues while using brief clinical vignettes, we hope that this article may stimulate clinicians to use the LPFS and discover its value in clinical practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychiatric Practice® seizes the day with its emphasis on the three Rs — readability, reliability, and relevance. Featuring an eye-catching style, the journal combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with practical and informative tips for treating patients. Mental health professionals will want access to this review journal — for sharpening their clinical skills, discovering the best in treatment, and navigating this rapidly changing field. Journal of Psychiatric Practice combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with informative "how to" tips for surviving in a managed care environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信