Pass/fail grading in preclinical courses and differential attainment between racially/ethnically minoritized groups and non-minoritized groups.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
David J Cipriano, José Franco, Robert Treat
{"title":"Pass/fail grading in preclinical courses and differential attainment between racially/ethnically minoritized groups and non-minoritized groups.","authors":"David J Cipriano, José Franco, Robert Treat","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2436452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many medical schools are transitioning to pass/fail grading from tiered grading systems which have been associated with increased competition, grade inflation, decreased wellness, and grading disparities along racial/ethnic lines. This retrospective cohort study followed two cohorts of students from one medical school for four years. One cohort was the last class to enter the school under a 5-point grading system for preclinical courses and the other was the first cohort to enter school under a pass/fail grading system for preclinical courses. Data was collected on various performance measures for the 501 students who comprised these two cohorts. Given the enduring problem of differential attainment between underrepresented in medicine (URiM) students to non-URiM students, we explored whether a change in grading systems impacted all students similarly. Overall students did as well or better in classroom performance, clerkship subject exams, and licensing exams following the change and the effect was essentially equal for URiM and non-URiM students alike. The most important finding was a decrease in differential attainment between URiM and non-URiM students after the change to pass/fail grading for the great majority of the performance measures studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2436452","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many medical schools are transitioning to pass/fail grading from tiered grading systems which have been associated with increased competition, grade inflation, decreased wellness, and grading disparities along racial/ethnic lines. This retrospective cohort study followed two cohorts of students from one medical school for four years. One cohort was the last class to enter the school under a 5-point grading system for preclinical courses and the other was the first cohort to enter school under a pass/fail grading system for preclinical courses. Data was collected on various performance measures for the 501 students who comprised these two cohorts. Given the enduring problem of differential attainment between underrepresented in medicine (URiM) students to non-URiM students, we explored whether a change in grading systems impacted all students similarly. Overall students did as well or better in classroom performance, clerkship subject exams, and licensing exams following the change and the effect was essentially equal for URiM and non-URiM students alike. The most important finding was a decrease in differential attainment between URiM and non-URiM students after the change to pass/fail grading for the great majority of the performance measures studied.

许多医学院正在从分级评分系统过渡到及格/不及格评分系统,而分级评分系统与竞争加剧、成绩膨胀、健康水平下降以及种族/民族评分差异有关。这项回顾性队列研究对一所医学院的两批学生进行了为期四年的跟踪调查。其中一届学生是在临床前课程 5 分制下入学的最后一届学生,另一届学生是在临床前课程及格/不及格制下入学的第一届学生。我们收集了这两批学生中 501 名学生的各种成绩数据。鉴于在医学领域代表性不足的学生与非代表性不足的学生之间的成绩差异问题长期存在,我们探讨了评分制度的改变是否会对所有学生产生类似的影响。总体而言,改变评分制度后,学生的课堂表现、实习科目考试和执业资格考试成绩都一样好,甚至更好,而且对URiM学生和非URiM学生的影响基本相同。最重要的发现是,在绝大多数成绩衡量标准方面,改为及格/不及格评分后,URiM 和非URiM 学生之间的成绩差距缩小了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信