{"title":"Pass/fail grading in preclinical courses and differential attainment between racially/ethnically minoritized groups and non-minoritized groups.","authors":"David J Cipriano, José Franco, Robert Treat","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2436452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many medical schools are transitioning to pass/fail grading from tiered grading systems which have been associated with increased competition, grade inflation, decreased wellness, and grading disparities along racial/ethnic lines. This retrospective cohort study followed two cohorts of students from one medical school for four years. One cohort was the last class to enter the school under a 5-point grading system for preclinical courses and the other was the first cohort to enter school under a pass/fail grading system for preclinical courses. Data was collected on various performance measures for the 501 students who comprised these two cohorts. Given the enduring problem of differential attainment between underrepresented in medicine (URiM) students to non-URiM students, we explored whether a change in grading systems impacted all students similarly. Overall students did as well or better in classroom performance, clerkship subject exams, and licensing exams following the change and the effect was essentially equal for URiM and non-URiM students alike. The most important finding was a decrease in differential attainment between URiM and non-URiM students after the change to pass/fail grading for the great majority of the performance measures studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2436452","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many medical schools are transitioning to pass/fail grading from tiered grading systems which have been associated with increased competition, grade inflation, decreased wellness, and grading disparities along racial/ethnic lines. This retrospective cohort study followed two cohorts of students from one medical school for four years. One cohort was the last class to enter the school under a 5-point grading system for preclinical courses and the other was the first cohort to enter school under a pass/fail grading system for preclinical courses. Data was collected on various performance measures for the 501 students who comprised these two cohorts. Given the enduring problem of differential attainment between underrepresented in medicine (URiM) students to non-URiM students, we explored whether a change in grading systems impacted all students similarly. Overall students did as well or better in classroom performance, clerkship subject exams, and licensing exams following the change and the effect was essentially equal for URiM and non-URiM students alike. The most important finding was a decrease in differential attainment between URiM and non-URiM students after the change to pass/fail grading for the great majority of the performance measures studied.
期刊介绍:
Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.