Unplanned Readmission Rate Before Interval Appendectomy After Nonoperative Management of Complicated Appendicitis.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Zane J Hellmann, Shahyan Rehman, Matthew Hornick, Daniel G Solomon
{"title":"Unplanned Readmission Rate Before Interval Appendectomy After Nonoperative Management of Complicated Appendicitis.","authors":"Zane J Hellmann, Shahyan Rehman, Matthew Hornick, Daniel G Solomon","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There remains clinical equipoise regarding the preference for upfront appendectomy or nonoperative management for patients with complicated appendicitis. However, the natural history of the appendix after nonoperative management and pending interval appendectomy in children is not well characterized, and the risk of recurrent appendicitis as a function of time from index admission not known.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The Pediatric Health Information System was queried for all patients younger than 18 years with an ICD-10 diagnosis code for complicated appendicitis admitted between 2018 and 2021. Patients were included for analysis if they received antibiotics on 3 or more consecutive days and did not undergo appendectomy during index admission. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine rates of unplanned readmission, defined as patients readmitted for appendicitis and receiving antibiotics on 3 or more consecutive days after index admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,826 patients were included in the study for complicated appendicitis. Of those, 2,016 (71.4%) underwent appendectomy, whereas the remaining 810 did not undergo appendectomy. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a 7% decrease unplanned readmission rates for each additional day patients were removed from index admission (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.96). Additionally, unplanned readmission rates in the first 50 days after index admission were twice as high as days 50 to 100 (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.76 to 3.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The highest likelihood of recurrent appendicitis or complication after nonoperative management of complicated appendicitis occurs in the first 50 days after index admission. This information will help surgeons during shared decision-making conversations regarding timing of interval appendectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"908-913"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There remains clinical equipoise regarding the preference for upfront appendectomy or nonoperative management for patients with complicated appendicitis. However, the natural history of the appendix after nonoperative management and pending interval appendectomy in children is not well characterized, and the risk of recurrent appendicitis as a function of time from index admission not known.

Study design: The Pediatric Health Information System was queried for all patients younger than 18 years with an ICD-10 diagnosis code for complicated appendicitis admitted between 2018 and 2021. Patients were included for analysis if they received antibiotics on 3 or more consecutive days and did not undergo appendectomy during index admission. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine rates of unplanned readmission, defined as patients readmitted for appendicitis and receiving antibiotics on 3 or more consecutive days after index admission.

Results: A total of 2,826 patients were included in the study for complicated appendicitis. Of those, 2,016 (71.4%) underwent appendectomy, whereas the remaining 810 did not undergo appendectomy. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a 7% decrease unplanned readmission rates for each additional day patients were removed from index admission (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.96). Additionally, unplanned readmission rates in the first 50 days after index admission were twice as high as days 50 to 100 (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.76 to 3.05).

Conclusions: The highest likelihood of recurrent appendicitis or complication after nonoperative management of complicated appendicitis occurs in the first 50 days after index admission. This information will help surgeons during shared decision-making conversations regarding timing of interval appendectomy.

复杂性阑尾炎非手术治疗后间隔阑尾切除术前的意外再入院率。
导言:临床上对于复杂性阑尾炎患者是选择前期阑尾切除术还是非手术治疗仍存在分歧。然而,儿童阑尾在接受非手术治疗和间歇性阑尾切除术后的自然病史特征并不明显,而且阑尾炎复发的风险与入院时间的关系也不清楚:查询了儿科健康信息系统(PHIS)中所有在2018-2021年间收治的、ICD-10诊断代码为复杂性阑尾炎的18岁以下患者。如果患者连续三天或三天以上接受抗生素治疗,且在索引入院期间未接受阑尾切除术,则纳入分析。为确定非计划再入院率,进行了卡普兰-梅耶分析,非计划再入院率定义为因阑尾炎再次入院且在索引入院后连续三天或更长时间接受抗生素治疗的患者。结果:2826 名复杂性阑尾炎患者被纳入研究。2,016名患者(71.4%)接受了阑尾切除术,其余810名患者没有接受阑尾切除术。Kaplan-Meier 生存分析表明,患者入院后每增加一天,非计划再入院率就会降低 7%(HR 0.93,95% CI 0.89-0.96)。此外,指标入院后前50天的非计划再入院率是50-100天的两倍(HR 2.31,95% CI 1.76-3.05):结论:复杂性阑尾炎非手术治疗后复发阑尾炎或并发症的可能性最高的时间段是入院后的前 50 天。这一信息将有助于外科医生就间歇性阑尾切除术的时机进行共同决策对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信