Quality of Life as a Non-mortality Patient-centred Outcome in the Critically Ill: A Retrospective Analysis.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Indian Journal of Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.25259/IJPC_48_2024
Sonali Vadi, Shreya Gudka, Priyadarshini Deo
{"title":"Quality of Life as a Non-mortality Patient-centred Outcome in the Critically Ill: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Sonali Vadi, Shreya Gudka, Priyadarshini Deo","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_48_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mortality is a common gauged endpoint in critically ill patients. Reduced quality of life is an aligned repercussion of protracted critical illness. Baseline status, severity of illness and its trajectory influence the outcomes. Patient-oriented outcomes are those that matter the most to a patient. However, quite often, family approves of trade-offs with survivorship in the Indian context. We looked at non-mortality outcomes in patients on high-intensity life-sustaining interventions admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) despite poor prognosis and died on full support or survived to be completely dependent.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective chart review study, we studied patients (1) who spent more than 1 month in the hospital enduring a myriad of distressing physical and psychological vicissitudes, (2) whose primary illness was fairly advanced (3) and either succumbed or survived to be impeded in their response to cognitive assessment and with severe functional impairment. Patient demographics, comorbidities, pre-morbid functional status, burden of critical illness, use of life-sustaining therapies, functional dependence in the last week of ICU stay, best neurological status in the last week pre-death or discharge, dying trajectories and economic analysis were noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Trends of clinical progress of 23 patients were deliberated. The mean age of males was 65 years and 61 years for females. Five patients had a Barthel index score of 10-20, indicating total dependency and two patients had a score of 21-60, indicating severe dependency. Two patients were cognitively impaired at baseline. The worst neurological status in the week before death or discharge was eye1, motor1, and verbaltracheostomised. Thirteen patients succumbed during ongoing treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Daily discussions on the dynamics of illness progression need to take place with family on a regular basis for patients managed in ICU. Realistic perceptions and grounded expectations from the families and caregivers are necessary for patient-centred outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":"30 4","pages":"366-374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJPC_48_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Mortality is a common gauged endpoint in critically ill patients. Reduced quality of life is an aligned repercussion of protracted critical illness. Baseline status, severity of illness and its trajectory influence the outcomes. Patient-oriented outcomes are those that matter the most to a patient. However, quite often, family approves of trade-offs with survivorship in the Indian context. We looked at non-mortality outcomes in patients on high-intensity life-sustaining interventions admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) despite poor prognosis and died on full support or survived to be completely dependent.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective chart review study, we studied patients (1) who spent more than 1 month in the hospital enduring a myriad of distressing physical and psychological vicissitudes, (2) whose primary illness was fairly advanced (3) and either succumbed or survived to be impeded in their response to cognitive assessment and with severe functional impairment. Patient demographics, comorbidities, pre-morbid functional status, burden of critical illness, use of life-sustaining therapies, functional dependence in the last week of ICU stay, best neurological status in the last week pre-death or discharge, dying trajectories and economic analysis were noted.

Results: Trends of clinical progress of 23 patients were deliberated. The mean age of males was 65 years and 61 years for females. Five patients had a Barthel index score of 10-20, indicating total dependency and two patients had a score of 21-60, indicating severe dependency. Two patients were cognitively impaired at baseline. The worst neurological status in the week before death or discharge was eye1, motor1, and verbaltracheostomised. Thirteen patients succumbed during ongoing treatment.

Conclusion: Daily discussions on the dynamics of illness progression need to take place with family on a regular basis for patients managed in ICU. Realistic perceptions and grounded expectations from the families and caregivers are necessary for patient-centred outcomes.

危重病人的生活质量作为非死亡率患者为中心的结果:回顾性分析。
目的:死亡率是危重患者常见的衡量终点。生活质量下降是长期危重疾病的一致后果。基线状态、疾病严重程度及其轨迹影响结果。以病人为导向的结果对病人来说是最重要的。然而,在印度的背景下,家庭通常赞成与幸存者的权衡。我们观察了接受高强度维持生命干预的患者的非死亡率结果,这些患者尽管预后不佳,但入住重症监护病房(ICU),在完全支持下死亡或存活到完全依赖。材料和方法:在这项回顾性图表回顾研究中,我们研究了以下患者:(1)在医院度过了1个多月的时间,忍受着各种痛苦的生理和心理变化;(2)原发疾病相当晚期;(3)死亡或存活,对认知评估的反应受到阻碍,并伴有严重的功能障碍。患者人口统计、合并症、发病前功能状态、危重疾病负担、维持生命疗法的使用、ICU住院最后一周的功能依赖、死亡前或出院前最后一周的最佳神经系统状态、死亡轨迹和经济分析都被记录下来。结果:分析了23例患者的临床进展趋势。男性平均年龄65岁,女性平均年龄61岁。5例患者Barthel指数评分为10-20分,表示完全依赖;2例患者Barthel指数评分为21-60分,表示严重依赖。两名患者在基线时认知受损。死亡或出院前一周最严重的神经系统状况为眼睛、运动和言语气管造口。13名患者在持续治疗期间死亡。结论:对于在ICU管理的患者,需要与家人定期讨论疾病进展的动态。对于以患者为中心的结果,来自家庭和护理人员的现实认知和有根据的期望是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Indian Journal of Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Indian Journal of Palliative Care. You have free full text access to recent issues of the journal. The links connect you to •guidelines and systematic reviews in palliative care and oncology •a directory of palliative care programmes in India and IAPC membership •Palliative Care Formulary, book reviews and other educational material •guidance on statistical tests and medical writing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信