Machine learning in predicting heart failure survival: a review of current models and future prospects.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart Failure Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1007/s10741-024-10474-y
Emmanuel Kokori, Ravi Patel, Gbolahan Olatunji, Bonaventure Michael Ukoaka, Israel Charles Abraham, Victor Oluwatomiwa Ajekiigbe, Julia Mimi Kwape, Adetola Emmanuel Babalola, Ntishor Gabriel Udam, Nicholas Aderinto
{"title":"Machine learning in predicting heart failure survival: a review of current models and future prospects.","authors":"Emmanuel Kokori, Ravi Patel, Gbolahan Olatunji, Bonaventure Michael Ukoaka, Israel Charles Abraham, Victor Oluwatomiwa Ajekiigbe, Julia Mimi Kwape, Adetola Emmanuel Babalola, Ntishor Gabriel Udam, Nicholas Aderinto","doi":"10.1007/s10741-024-10474-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart failure is a complex and prevalent condition with significant implications for patient management and survival prediction. Traditional predictive models often fall short in accuracy due to their reliance on pre-specified predictors and assumptions of variable independence. This review aims to assess the role of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting heart failure survival, comparing their performance with traditional statistical methods and identifying key predictive features. We conducted a review of studies utilizing ML algorithms for heart failure survival prediction. Data were sourced from PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Embase, DOAJ, and the Cochrane Library, covering studies published until July 2024. A total of 10 studies were reviewed, encompassing 468,171 patients with heart failure. ML algorithms, particularly random forests and gradient boosting methods, demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional statistical models. These algorithms effectively identified key risk factors and stratified patients into risk categories with high accuracy. Notably, extreme learning machine (ELM) and CatBoost models showed exceptional predictive capabilities, as indicated by metrics such as Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and area under the curve (AUC). Key predictive features included ejection fraction (EF), serum creatinine (S Cr), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN). ML algorithms offer significant advantages in predicting heart failure survival by uncovering complex patterns and improving risk stratification. Their integration into clinical practice could lead to more personalized treatment strategies and enhanced patient outcomes. However, challenges such as data quality, model interpretability, and integration into clinical workflows need to be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12950,"journal":{"name":"Heart Failure Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"431-442"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Failure Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-024-10474-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heart failure is a complex and prevalent condition with significant implications for patient management and survival prediction. Traditional predictive models often fall short in accuracy due to their reliance on pre-specified predictors and assumptions of variable independence. This review aims to assess the role of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting heart failure survival, comparing their performance with traditional statistical methods and identifying key predictive features. We conducted a review of studies utilizing ML algorithms for heart failure survival prediction. Data were sourced from PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Embase, DOAJ, and the Cochrane Library, covering studies published until July 2024. A total of 10 studies were reviewed, encompassing 468,171 patients with heart failure. ML algorithms, particularly random forests and gradient boosting methods, demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional statistical models. These algorithms effectively identified key risk factors and stratified patients into risk categories with high accuracy. Notably, extreme learning machine (ELM) and CatBoost models showed exceptional predictive capabilities, as indicated by metrics such as Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and area under the curve (AUC). Key predictive features included ejection fraction (EF), serum creatinine (S Cr), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN). ML algorithms offer significant advantages in predicting heart failure survival by uncovering complex patterns and improving risk stratification. Their integration into clinical practice could lead to more personalized treatment strategies and enhanced patient outcomes. However, challenges such as data quality, model interpretability, and integration into clinical workflows need to be addressed.

机器学习预测心力衰竭生存:当前模型的回顾和未来展望。
心力衰竭是一种复杂而普遍的疾病,对患者管理和生存预测具有重要意义。传统的预测模型由于依赖于预先指定的预测因子和变量独立性的假设,往往精度不足。本综述旨在评估机器学习(ML)算法在预测心力衰竭生存中的作用,将其性能与传统统计方法进行比较,并确定关键预测特征。我们对利用ML算法预测心力衰竭生存期的研究进行了回顾。数据来自PubMed/MEDLINE、谷歌Scholar、ScienceDirect、Embase、DOAJ和Cochrane Library,涵盖了截至2024年7月发表的研究。总共回顾了10项研究,包括468,171例心力衰竭患者。与传统的统计模型相比,机器学习算法,特别是随机森林和梯度增强方法,表现出了优越的性能。这些算法有效地识别关键危险因素,并以较高的准确率将患者分层。值得注意的是,极端学习机(ELM)和CatBoost模型显示出卓越的预测能力,如哈雷尔的一致性指数(C-index)和曲线下面积(AUC)等指标。主要预测特征包括射血分数(EF)、血清肌酐(S Cr)和血尿素氮(BUN)。ML算法通过揭示复杂的模式和改善风险分层,在预测心力衰竭生存方面提供了显著的优势。将它们整合到临床实践中可以带来更个性化的治疗策略,并提高患者的治疗效果。然而,数据质量、模型可解释性和临床工作流程集成等挑战需要解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Failure Reviews
Heart Failure Reviews 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart Failure Reviews is an international journal which develops links between basic scientists and clinical investigators, creating a unique, interdisciplinary dialogue focused on heart failure, its pathogenesis and treatment. The journal accordingly publishes papers in both basic and clinical research fields. Topics covered include clinical and surgical approaches to therapy, basic pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pathology, and electrophysiology. The reviews are comprehensive, expanding the reader''s knowledge base and awareness of current research and new findings in this rapidly growing field of cardiovascular medicine. All reviews are thoroughly peer-reviewed before publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信