{"title":"Nationwide survey on HER2 and PD-L1 testing practices in gastric cancer across Japan.","authors":"Hiroyuki Abe, Takeshi Kuwata, Ryoji Kushima, Tetsuo Ushiku","doi":"10.1007/s10120-024-01571-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since HER2 and PD-L1 testing are key to selecting drugs for first-line treatments in advanced gastric cancer, evaluating differences in these tests among institutions is necessary to standardize treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire survey was conducted targeting institutions certified by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were obtained from 155 institutions. Most institutions performed HER2 testing in-house, while PD-L1 tests were largely outsourced. HER2 scores and PD-L1 CPS rates showed greater variability across institutions than anticipated. In the pre-analytic phase, 10% neutral buffered formalin was commonly used, with fixation practices generally following guidelines. Overall, the impact of fixation-related factors was limited, but in surgical specimens, longer fixation was associated with a higher proportion of score 0/1+ and a lower proportion of score 3+. When examining HER2 scores by institution, if a particular score had a high (or low) frequency in biopsy, the same trend was also seen in surgical specimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that not only factors related to specimen preparation, but also biases in evaluation criteria among pathologists may contribute to the significant variability among institutions. Standardization of pre- and post-analytic phases, coupled with appropriate training, is essential to achieve consistent gastric cancer therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"294-300"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastric Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-024-01571-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Since HER2 and PD-L1 testing are key to selecting drugs for first-line treatments in advanced gastric cancer, evaluating differences in these tests among institutions is necessary to standardize treatment.
Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted targeting institutions certified by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.
Results: Responses were obtained from 155 institutions. Most institutions performed HER2 testing in-house, while PD-L1 tests were largely outsourced. HER2 scores and PD-L1 CPS rates showed greater variability across institutions than anticipated. In the pre-analytic phase, 10% neutral buffered formalin was commonly used, with fixation practices generally following guidelines. Overall, the impact of fixation-related factors was limited, but in surgical specimens, longer fixation was associated with a higher proportion of score 0/1+ and a lower proportion of score 3+. When examining HER2 scores by institution, if a particular score had a high (or low) frequency in biopsy, the same trend was also seen in surgical specimens.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that not only factors related to specimen preparation, but also biases in evaluation criteria among pathologists may contribute to the significant variability among institutions. Standardization of pre- and post-analytic phases, coupled with appropriate training, is essential to achieve consistent gastric cancer therapy.
期刊介绍:
Gastric Cancer is an esteemed global forum that focuses on various aspects of gastric cancer research, treatment, and biology worldwide.
The journal promotes a diverse range of content, including original articles, case reports, short communications, and technical notes. It also welcomes Letters to the Editor discussing published articles or sharing viewpoints on gastric cancer topics.
Review articles are predominantly sought after by the Editor, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the field.
With a dedicated and knowledgeable editorial team, the journal is committed to providing exceptional support and ensuring high levels of author satisfaction. In fact, over 90% of published authors have expressed their intent to publish again in our esteemed journal.