Nationwide survey on HER2 and PD-L1 testing practices in gastric cancer across Japan.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gastric Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1007/s10120-024-01571-w
Hiroyuki Abe, Takeshi Kuwata, Ryoji Kushima, Tetsuo Ushiku
{"title":"Nationwide survey on HER2 and PD-L1 testing practices in gastric cancer across Japan.","authors":"Hiroyuki Abe, Takeshi Kuwata, Ryoji Kushima, Tetsuo Ushiku","doi":"10.1007/s10120-024-01571-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since HER2 and PD-L1 testing are key to selecting drugs for first-line treatments in advanced gastric cancer, evaluating differences in these tests among institutions is necessary to standardize treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire survey was conducted targeting institutions certified by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were obtained from 155 institutions. Most institutions performed HER2 testing in-house, while PD-L1 tests were largely outsourced. HER2 scores and PD-L1 CPS rates showed greater variability across institutions than anticipated. In the pre-analytic phase, 10% neutral buffered formalin was commonly used, with fixation practices generally following guidelines. Overall, the impact of fixation-related factors was limited, but in surgical specimens, longer fixation was associated with a higher proportion of score 0/1+ and a lower proportion of score 3+. When examining HER2 scores by institution, if a particular score had a high (or low) frequency in biopsy, the same trend was also seen in surgical specimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that not only factors related to specimen preparation, but also biases in evaluation criteria among pathologists may contribute to the significant variability among institutions. Standardization of pre- and post-analytic phases, coupled with appropriate training, is essential to achieve consistent gastric cancer therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"294-300"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastric Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-024-01571-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since HER2 and PD-L1 testing are key to selecting drugs for first-line treatments in advanced gastric cancer, evaluating differences in these tests among institutions is necessary to standardize treatment.

Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted targeting institutions certified by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Results: Responses were obtained from 155 institutions. Most institutions performed HER2 testing in-house, while PD-L1 tests were largely outsourced. HER2 scores and PD-L1 CPS rates showed greater variability across institutions than anticipated. In the pre-analytic phase, 10% neutral buffered formalin was commonly used, with fixation practices generally following guidelines. Overall, the impact of fixation-related factors was limited, but in surgical specimens, longer fixation was associated with a higher proportion of score 0/1+ and a lower proportion of score 3+. When examining HER2 scores by institution, if a particular score had a high (or low) frequency in biopsy, the same trend was also seen in surgical specimens.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that not only factors related to specimen preparation, but also biases in evaluation criteria among pathologists may contribute to the significant variability among institutions. Standardization of pre- and post-analytic phases, coupled with appropriate training, is essential to achieve consistent gastric cancer therapy.

日本胃癌中HER2和PD-L1检测实践的全国性调查
背景:由于HER2和PD-L1检测是晚期胃癌一线治疗药物选择的关键,评估不同机构间这些检测的差异对于规范治疗是必要的。方法:针对日本胃癌协会认证机构进行问卷调查。结果:获得了155个机构的反馈。大多数机构在内部进行HER2检测,而PD-L1检测主要外包。HER2评分和PD-L1 CPS率在不同机构之间的差异比预期的要大。在分析前阶段,通常使用10%中性缓冲福尔马林,固定方法一般遵循指南。总体而言,固定相关因素的影响有限,但在手术标本中,固定时间越长,评分为0/1+的比例越高,评分为3+的比例越低。当按机构检查HER2评分时,如果一个特定的评分在活检中有高(或低)频率,同样的趋势也可以在手术标本中看到。结论:这些发现表明,不仅与标本制备有关的因素,而且病理学家之间评估标准的偏差可能导致不同机构之间的显著差异。标准化前和后分析阶段,加上适当的培训,是必不可少的,以实现一致的胃癌治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastric Cancer
Gastric Cancer 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastric Cancer is an esteemed global forum that focuses on various aspects of gastric cancer research, treatment, and biology worldwide. The journal promotes a diverse range of content, including original articles, case reports, short communications, and technical notes. It also welcomes Letters to the Editor discussing published articles or sharing viewpoints on gastric cancer topics. Review articles are predominantly sought after by the Editor, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the field. With a dedicated and knowledgeable editorial team, the journal is committed to providing exceptional support and ensuring high levels of author satisfaction. In fact, over 90% of published authors have expressed their intent to publish again in our esteemed journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信