Implementing a Bayesian approach using Stan with Torsten: Population pharmacokinetics analysis of somatrogon

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yuchen Wang, Xinyi Pei, Tao Niu, Joan Korth-Bradley, Luke Fostvedt
{"title":"Implementing a Bayesian approach using Stan with Torsten: Population pharmacokinetics analysis of somatrogon","authors":"Yuchen Wang,&nbsp;Xinyi Pei,&nbsp;Tao Niu,&nbsp;Joan Korth-Bradley,&nbsp;Luke Fostvedt","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fully Bayesian approaches are not commonly implemented for population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling. In this paper, we evaluate the use of Stan with R and Torsten for population PK modeling of somatrogon, a recombinant long-acting growth hormone approved for the treatment of growth hormone deficiency. As a software for Bayesian inference, Stan provides an easy way to conduct MCMC sampling for a wide range of models with efficient sampling algorithms, and there are several diagnostic tools to evaluate the MCMC convergence and other potential issues. Three different sets of priors were evaluated for estimation and prediction: a weakly informative uniform set, a moderately informative set, and a very informative set of priors. All three prior sets showed good performance and all chains mixed well. There were some minor differences in the final parameter posterior distributions while implementing different prior sets, but the posterior predictions covered the observations nicely, not only for the individuals included in posterior sampling but also for new individuals. The impact of a centered versus non-centered parameterization were evaluated, with the non-centered approach improving the estimation time, but it was still computationally intensive. Computational resources had the biggest impact on sampling time. Stan took approximately 2.5 h total for the MCMC sampling on a high-performance computing platform (6 cores) and may be reduced further with additional computational resources. The model and comparisons presented show that with adequate computational resources, the Bayesian approaches using Stan and Torsten are useful for population PK analysis, especially for the analysis of special populations, small sample datasets, and when complex model structures are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"14 2","pages":"351-364"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.13279","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp4.13279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fully Bayesian approaches are not commonly implemented for population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling. In this paper, we evaluate the use of Stan with R and Torsten for population PK modeling of somatrogon, a recombinant long-acting growth hormone approved for the treatment of growth hormone deficiency. As a software for Bayesian inference, Stan provides an easy way to conduct MCMC sampling for a wide range of models with efficient sampling algorithms, and there are several diagnostic tools to evaluate the MCMC convergence and other potential issues. Three different sets of priors were evaluated for estimation and prediction: a weakly informative uniform set, a moderately informative set, and a very informative set of priors. All three prior sets showed good performance and all chains mixed well. There were some minor differences in the final parameter posterior distributions while implementing different prior sets, but the posterior predictions covered the observations nicely, not only for the individuals included in posterior sampling but also for new individuals. The impact of a centered versus non-centered parameterization were evaluated, with the non-centered approach improving the estimation time, but it was still computationally intensive. Computational resources had the biggest impact on sampling time. Stan took approximately 2.5 h total for the MCMC sampling on a high-performance computing platform (6 cores) and may be reduced further with additional computational resources. The model and comparisons presented show that with adequate computational resources, the Bayesian approaches using Stan and Torsten are useful for population PK analysis, especially for the analysis of special populations, small sample datasets, and when complex model structures are needed.

Abstract Image

与 Torsten 一起使用 Stan 实现贝叶斯方法:索马曲贡的群体药代动力学分析。
完全贝叶斯方法通常不用于群体药代动力学(PK)建模。在本文中,我们评估了Stan与R和Torsten在生长激素(一种被批准用于治疗生长激素缺乏症的重组长效生长激素)群体PK建模中的应用。作为一款贝叶斯推理软件,Stan提供了一种简单的方法,通过高效的采样算法对各种模型进行MCMC采样,并且有几种诊断工具来评估MCMC收敛性和其他潜在问题。评估了三种不同的先验集用于估计和预测:弱信息统一集,中等信息集和非常信息集先验。所有三个先前的集合显示良好的性能和所有链混合良好。在实现不同的先验集时,最终参数后验分布有一些微小的差异,但后验预测很好地覆盖了观察结果,不仅对后验抽样中包含的个体,而且对新个体也是如此。评估了中心与非中心参数化的影响,非中心方法改善了估计时间,但仍然是计算密集型的。计算资源对采样时间的影响最大。Stan在高性能计算平台(6核)上进行MCMC采样总共花费了大约2.5小时,并且可以通过额外的计算资源进一步减少。模型和比较表明,在计算资源充足的情况下,使用Stan和Torsten的贝叶斯方法对种群PK分析是有用的,特别是对于特殊种群、小样本数据集和需要复杂模型结构的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信